hahahaha, Dorian's soft size doesn't equal Ronnie's denser size. Learn the difference. Sea what eye did there?
what visual, objective criteria are you using to determine level of conditioning so that we may all understand the retard logic that goes on in your head?
does Dorian have more separations? No
does Dorian have more striations? No
so laughing and then contradicting yourself in light of visual evidence makes you look foolish. I'm giving you a chance to redeem yourself by explaining how you determined that Dorian has better conditioning based on pics using only objective criteria. 
how so?
is Dorian's back larger? No
does Dorian's back have more separations? No
does Dorian's back have more striations? No
does Dorian's back have better taper? No
by all means, enlighten us how Dorian has a better back based on the pics despite being inferior in all the above criteria.
Well troll number two right back at it again in another Dorian Yates thread lol thanks for proving my point kid , you're the guy who came back and complained people are still at these debates and low and behold hypocrite much?
hahahaha, Dorian's soft size doesn't equal Ronnie's denser size. Learn the difference. Sea what eye did there?
what visual, objective criteria are you using to determine level of conditioning so that we may all understand the retard logic that goes on in your head?Yes I see what you did , made a blanket statement without backing up any of your claims what so ever nothing new with you. Let me correct you again
You don't even know what great conditioning is a proven fact , what means are you using to ascertain who has the superior conditioning? two pictures with different lighting different sources ( video vs magazine scan ) more inaccurate means so for you to claim who has better conditioning based on these means is ignorant , inaccurate and wishful thinking
I can say who has better conditioning based on eyewitnesses who have been in the business of physique evaluation longer than you been alive , so when I say Ronnie's softer size doesn't equate to Dorian's density it carries more weight than your ignorant blanket statements , pay attention to this kid
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink. I’m now not sure that Ronnie at 245 pounds would beat Dorian at 269 pounds. At a bigger bodyweight I think Ronnie would look soft next to an in-shape rock-hard Dorian.
On the subject of conditioning, no-one did it better than Dorian. He achieved a hardness and dryness (without losing fullness) that nobody has ever matched. In the flesh he looked even harder than he did in photos. It was like a statue made of granite was standing in front of you.
This renders ANYTHING you type on the subject moot , if you attempt do discredit him you'll be laughed at ( as usual ) and to add insult to injury Dorian has said specific to this debate his conditioning is better than Ronnie and Kevin Horton has said Dorian's conditioning is unmatched to this date , you can't argue to the contrary just deny
does Dorian have more separations? No
does Dorian have more striations? No
so laughing and then contradicting yourself in light of visual evidence makes you look foolish. I'm giving you a chance to redeem yourself by explaining how you determined that Dorian has better conditioning based on pics using only objective criteria.
See above how came to these conclusions in such an inaccurate fan-boy way it's not even funny , couple above with the fact that Dorian looks eons better than he does in pics & video for you to attempt to try and claim who is better conditioned or has more separations & striations is retarded ( like many of your empty claims )
o laughing and then contradicting yourself in light of visual evidence makes you look foolish. I'm giving you a chance to redeem yourself by explaining how you determined that Dorian has better conditioning based on pics using only objective criteria.
how so?
is Dorian's back larger? No
does Dorian's back have more separations? No
does Dorian's back have more striations? No
does Dorian's back have better taper? No
by all means, enlighten us how Dorian has a better back based on the pics despite being inferior in all the above criteria.
Once again see above , how do you know who's back is larger? how the fuck did you come to this conclusion? are the side-by-side in the comparison? were you there? you ascertained this how? via a two dimensional picture? LMFAO your posts reek of ignorance and stupidity . You try so hard to speak intelligently on a topic but you always fall flat on your face in the light of contradictory evidence from well established professionals , you're a very insecure kid and you try so hard but you really need to do some research before you type
