Author Topic: The Official Michele Bachmann 2012 Appreciation Thread (Read 33593 times)

tu_holmes · « **Reply #150 on:** February 17, 2011, 12:01:16 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on February 17, 2011, 11:49:34 AM

What part of the patriot act specifically impacts you?

I believe the surveillance provisions impact everyone.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #151 on:** February 17, 2011, 12:02:36 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 17, 2011, 12:01:16 PM

I believe the surveillance provisions impact everyone.

i don't agree with the warrantless wiretaps at all, but other than that - what provisions specifically impact people?

tu_holmes · « **Reply #152 on:** February 17, 2011, 02:24:25 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on February 17, 2011, 12:02:36 PM

i don't agree with the warrantless wiretaps at all, but other than that - what provisions specifically impact people?

I don't think I need any more than that.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #153 on:** February 17, 2011, 02:26:05 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 17, 2011, 02:24:25 PM

I don't think I need any more than that.

I agree with you on that. don't like warrantless anything and also don't agree with the indefinate detention stuff.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #154 on:** February 17, 2011, 02:27:38 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on February 17, 2011, 02:26:05 PM

I agree with you on that. don't like warrantless anything and also don't agree with the indefinate detention stuff.

Nor do I.

So I think on those provisions alone that anyone who votes FOR the patriot act can suck a dick.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #155 on:** February 17, 2011, 02:29:45 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 17, 2011, 02:27:38 PM

Nor do I.

So I think on those provisions alone that anyone who votes FOR the patriot act can suck a dick.

Fine i agree on that.

We need checks and balances in these things and IMHO - everyone deserves a hearing at some point as to their detention. Either have a trial of some sort or let them go, or execute them under rules of war if cuaght on the battlefield.

whork25 · « **Reply #156 on:** February 18, 2011, 01:49:03 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 17, 2011, 08:13:45 AM

Laughable...

When was the last time a Republican showed economic fiscal responsibility or wanted to stay out of your life? They are the groups telling you not to get abortions and not to allow gays to get married and the group telling you to stay out of strip clubs.

The Dems aren't any better because they are hugely fiscally irresponsible, but at least they don't act like they care who you fuck... People talk about how they want to take away your guns, but I haven't seen that come out of any democratic controlled congress.

Why do you suck the republican cock so much 3333?

Nice

Dos Equis · « **Reply #157 on:** February 18, 2011, 07:16:56 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 17, 2011, 12:01:16 PM

I believe the surveillance provisions impact everyone.

Didn't the warrantless wiretaps provisions get struck down by the courts?

tu_holmes · « **Reply #158 on:** February 18, 2011, 12:02:35 PM »

Quote from: Beach Bum on February 18, 2011, 07:16:56 AM

Didn't the warrantless wiretaps provisions get struck down by the courts?

Not that I've seen... As a matter of fact, I am quite certain that FBI agents were putting bugs and GPS tracers on cars without warrants still... It's been all over the news.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #159 on:** March 07, 2011, 06:08:39 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on January 21, 2011, 05:58:22 AM

Bachmann Stands by ‘Gangster Government’ Description
By Melanie Starkey
Roll Call Staff
March 6, 2011, 1:39 p.m.

Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) refused Sunday to retreat from her characterization of the Obama administration as a "gangster government."

The House Tea Party Caucus founder said, "I don't take back my statement on gangster government," a phrase she used at a tea party gathering in April. "I think that there have been actions that have been taken by this government that I think are corrupt," she said during her appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press."

She hammered at the administration Sunday for $105 billion included in last year's health care overhaul law for its implementation, regardless of the questions put to her. Bachmann called on the White House last week to apologize for the funding, which the Congressional Research Service reported in October.

The money was "hidden in various parts of the bill," she said Sunday. "Members of Congress didn't even know this money was in the bill, because we couldn't read the bill before it was passed, because it wasn't given to us but hours before we had to vote for it," she said.

Bachmann said she hasn't "made a decision either way about plans for" entering the 2012 presidential election.

"We can do so much better, she said. "And that's what I'm talking about with people in the next few months. We need to think very strongly. A second administration of Jimmy Carter wouldn't have done this country any favors. We need to make sure we don't have a second Barack Obama administration."

When asked if she had a timeline for making a decision about running, she responded, "I think there's a normal course of events when a decision like that will be made. And if I choose to go down that road, I'll make the decision."

http://www.rollcall.com/news/-203887-1.html?ET=rollcall:e9939:80104117a:&st=email&pos=epol

________________________ ________________________ _________

I wish she were younger not married and did not have 25 kids.

whork25 · « **Reply #160 on:** March 07, 2011, 06:20:47 AM »

Why?? so you can hear the same conservative talk over and over but when it comes down to it she is still voting for the patriot act meaning hear words doesnt mean shit???

MCWAY · « **Reply #161 on:** March 07, 2011, 06:21:03 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 17, 2011, 08:13:45 AM

Laughable...

When was the last time a Republican showed economic fiscal responsibility or wanted to stay out of your life? They are the groups telling you not to get abortions and not to allow gays to get married and the group telling you to stay out of strip clubs.

The Dems aren't any better because they are hugely fiscally irresponsible, but at least they don't act like they care who you fuck... People talk about how they want to take away your guns, but I haven't seen that come out of any democratic controlled congress.

Why do you suck the republican cock so much 3333?

I thought you didn't have a problem with that.

blacken700 · « **Reply #162 on:** March 07, 2011, 06:25:55 AM »

Michele Bachmann

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #163 on:** March 07, 2011, 06:26:55 AM »

Exposing more treason and theft from Obama the communist/marxist/muslim traitor.

FUCK YOU anyone who still supports ths admn. You are worse than him at this point.

blacken700 · « **Reply #164 on:** March 07, 2011, 06:32:39 AM »

chadstallion · « **Reply #165 on:** March 07, 2011, 06:45:38 AM »

love the lady and can't get enough of her.
will have popcorn ready for the debates...it will be a ratings winner and fodder for the Daily Show for weeks.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #166 on:** March 07, 2011, 06:48:56 AM »

Quote from: chadstallion on March 07, 2011, 06:45:38 AM

love the lady and can't get enough of her.
will have popcorn ready for the debates...it will be a ratings winner and fodder for the Daily Show for weeks.

She is one of the only ones exposing te daily acts of treason of this horrible Admn.

________________________ _____-

" The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president".

chadstallion · « **Reply #167 on:** March 07, 2011, 03:40:23 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 07, 2011, 06:48:56 AM

She is one of the only ones exposing te daily acts of treason of this horrible Admn.

________________________ _____-

and she's a hoot to listen do interviews!

" The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president".

Dos Equis · « **Reply #168 on:** March 24, 2011, 10:29:57 AM »

CNN Exclusive: Bachmann to form exploratory committee in June, possibly earlier
By: CNN Political Producer Shannon Travis

Washington (CNN) – CNN has exclusively learned that Rep. Michele Bachmann will form a presidential exploratory committee. The Minnesota Republican plans to file papers for the committee in early June, with an announcement likely around that same time.

But a source close to the congresswoman said that Bachmann could form the exploratory committee even earlier than June so that she could participate in early Republican presidential debates.

"She's been telling everyone early summer," the source told CNN regarding Bachmann's planned June filing and announcement. But the source said that nothing is static.

"If you [debate sponsors] come to us and say, 'To be in our debates, you have to have an exploratory committee,' then we'll say, 'Okay, fine...I'll go file the forms.'"

Three GOP presidential primary debates are planned before and during early June: The first one on May 2 at the Ronald Reagan Library in Simi Valley, California and another on May 5 in South Carolina. CNN plans a GOP presidential primary debate in New Hampshire in early June.

Meanwhile, CNN has also learned that Iowa Republican state Sen. Kent Sorenson will likely be hired to be Bachmann's political director for the state - and that Bachmann aides hope to have a complete team together for Iowa by this weekend.

Sorenson is a prominent Tea Party figure in Iowa and holds sway with evangelicals in the state. He has publicly said he will support Bachmann if she mounts a presidential bid.

The three-term congresswoman and Tea Party favorite hopes to also have political teams in place - very soon - in New Hampshire, home to the first-in-the-nation presidential primary, and South Carolina, host of the first presidential primary in the South.

"I could have state directors in all those states within a week," Bachmann Chief of Staff Andy Parrish said.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/03/24/cnn-exclusive-michele-bachmann-to-form-exploratory-committee-in-june-possibly-earlier/#more-151424

chadstallion · « **Reply #169 on:** March 24, 2011, 01:29:51 PM »

thank you, Jesus; the debates will reach ratings that even beat American Idol.
now, if Christine O'Donnell would just run...

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #170 on:** March 24, 2011, 01:31:22 PM »

MB will bitch slap ZERO.

Zero deserves about ten kicks in the balls consecutively.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #171 on:** March 24, 2011, 01:33:52 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 24, 2011, 01:31:22 PM

MB will bitch slap ZERO.

Zero deserves about ten kicks in the balls consecutively.

Do you seriously believe she can beat Obama? Honestly?

I don't.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #172 on:** March 24, 2011, 01:43:35 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on March 24, 2011, 01:33:52 PM

Do you seriously believe she can beat Obama? Honestly?

I don't.

Yes. She will kick ass in the Mid West and will get a lot more women than palin could since she is not a diva and has a compelling story. She adopted 25 kids.

She is an attorney, is a fighter, has guts out the yin yang, and not afraid to call a spade a spade.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #173 on:** March 24, 2011, 01:44:22 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on March 24, 2011, 01:43:35 PM

Yes. She will kick ass in the Mid West and will get a lot more women than palin could since she is not a diva and has a compelling story. She adopted 25 kids.

She is an attorney, is a fighter, has guts out the yin yang, and not afraid to call a spade a spade.

I think she will get branded, fairly, as kind of a kook.

240 is Back · « **Reply #174 on:** March 24, 2011, 01:49:22 PM »

bachmann is very intelligent and tends to embrace liberal media. She goes right at chris mathews on msnbc often, and comes out grinning and zinging him right back.

She is a rich man's Palin, if you will.

She has all the spunk, but she's smart. yes, she got the 5th grade lexington thing mixed up, but with 23 foster kids, I'll give her a pass on forgetting something she hasn't read in a book for 30 years.