Author Topic: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  (Read 13537 times)

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #25 on: March 17, 2010, 03:36:26 PM »
Bullshit...Eating less and losing excess body fat do not automatically go hand in hand. Low calorie, high carb diets generate a series of biochemical signals in your body that will take you out of the balance, making it more difficult to access stored body fat for energy. Result: you'll reach a weight-loss plateau, beyond which you simply can't lose any more weight.

Once the glycogen levels are filled in both the liver and the muscles, excess carbohydrates have just one fate: to be converted into fat and stored in the adipose, that is, fatty, tissue. In a nutshell, even though carbohydrates themselves are fat-free, excess carbohydrates ends up as excess fat. That's not the worst of it. Any meal or snack high in carbohydrates will generate a rapid rise in blood glucose.

The problem is that insulin is essentially a storage hormone, evolved to put aside excess carbohydrate calories in the form of fat in case of future famine. So the insulin that's stimulated by excess carbohydrates aggressively promotes the accumulation of body fat. In other words, when we eat too much carbohydrate, we're essentially sending a hormonal message, via insulin, to the body (actually, to the adipose cells). The message: "Store fat."

Not only do increased insulin levels tell the body to store carbohydrates as fat, they also tell it not to release any stored fat. This makes it impossible for you to use your own stored body fat for energy. So the excess carbohydrates in your diet not only make you fat, they make sure you stay fat. It's a double whammy, and it can be lethal.

Insulin is released by the pancreas after you eat carbohydrates. This causes a rise in blood sugar. Insulin assures your cells receive some blood sugar necessary for life, and increases glycogen storage. However, it also drives your body to use more carbohydrate, and less fat, as fuel. And, insulin converts almost half of your dietary carbohydrate to fat for storage. If you want to use more fats for energy, the insulin response must be moderated. Diets high in refined sugars release more insulin thereby allowing less stored fat to be burned. High insulin levels also suppress two important hormones: glucagon and growth hormone. Glucagon promotes the burning of fat and sugar. Growth hormone is used for muscle development and building new muscle mass.

Insulin also causes hunger. As blood sugar increases following a carbohydrate meal, insulin rises with the eventual result of lower blood sugar. This results in hunger, often only a couple of hours (or less) after the meal. Cravings, usually for sweets, are frequently part of this cycle, leading you to resort to snacking, often on more carbohydrates. Not eating makes you feel ravenous shaky, moody and ready to "crash." If the problem is chronic, you never get rid of that extra stored fat, and your energy is adversely affected.

This aint bro-science...This is fact.  Look it up.  Where is your proof in what you're saying?

Fat is stored and released all the time during the day. What counts in the end is overall body composition change. I don't know any studies that have shown any effect of carbs on body composition as long as protein is high enough and total calories are adjusted for a certain rate of weight change. Do you?

Many bodybuilders diet with high carbs, Chris Aceto e.g. has his clients diet on a high carbs. Many bodybuilders have tried both high and low carb diets and had great success both ways.

There is no such thing as a weight loss plateau, if you stop losing weight for a few weeks, all you have to do is slightly reduce calories until you start losing weight again.

dyslexic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7676
  • baddoggy
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #26 on: March 17, 2010, 03:36:31 PM »
Get your body to release lipase...


Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) plays a critical role in the metabolism of plasma lipoproteins. In 3T3-L1 adipocytes, insulin elicits the rapid release of LPL through mechanisms that are independent of energy metabolism and protein synthesis. Some of the metabolic actions of insulin may be mediated by the activation of a specific phospholipase that hydrolyzes a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (PI) molecule. The insulin-sensitive glycosyl-PI is structurally similar to the glycolipid membrane anchor of a number of proteins. LPL appears to be anchored to the 3T3-L1 cell surface by glycosyl-PI, and its rapid release by insulin may be due to activation of a glycosyl-PI-specific phospholipase C.


In other words:

Fats require special digestive action before absorption because the end products must be carried in a water medium (blood and lymph) in which fats are not soluble. Lipase is the primary digestant used to split fats into fatty acids and glycerol. Although little actual fat digestion occurs in the stomach, gastric lipase does digest already emulsified fats such as in egg yolk and cream.

Emulsification is the real key to the proper digestion of fats. The large fat molecule presents comparatively small surfaces for the lipase to work on, so the process of emulsification by the action of bile produced by the liver is necessary. Bile breaks down the large fat molecule to tiny droplets which provide lipase with an enormously increased surface to work on. This action takes place in the small intestine and the lipase involved here is a part of the pancreatic secretion.




It pays to keep those carbs low if that is the direction you want to go.


What I don't get are the BF% figures....


Let's say you weigh 267lbs. 10% of that is 26.7lbs. of fat.


  267
- 26.7
______

240.3 lbs LBM

Surely you would lose some muscle along with the fat and probably end up around 215 at 10% if you were lucky (and did everything consistently)


Not sure how you are running your figures. You have to account for poundages of both fat and muscle being lost at the same time. As much as we would like to maintain ALL of our muscle and lose ONLY the fat accumulation- I believe it is nearly impossible...

Unless...

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41300
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #27 on: March 17, 2010, 03:37:41 PM »
Isnt 2730 to 2900 calories per day kinda high if you're trying to drop 40 lbs?  You can probably drop it to 2000-2200 and cut out the ECA + T3 and lose more weight than you would with the extra 700 calories per day + T3 and ECA.

Or you can keep the ECA and T3 and just drop your daily calories by 700 and that's an extra lb lost every five days (5 x 700 = 3500 calories = 1 lb), and you'll get to your 40 lb goal faster.

Good points Bob.  I was already considering doing this because, the protein is way too high and I'm not a big eater.  It's not that I'm hungry, it's that I don't want to eat this shit...I'd rather eat garbage but like I said, I'm tired of being an Alex.
7

newmom

  • Guest
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #28 on: March 17, 2010, 03:38:46 PM »
Good points Bob.  I was already considering doing this because, the protein is way too high and I'm not a big eater.  It's not that I'm hungry, it's that I don't want to eat this shit...I'd rather eat garbage but like I said, I'm tired of being an Alex.

you reached your breaking part which is the best motivation

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #29 on: March 17, 2010, 03:40:51 PM »
Stop whining on the boards fatass, find some willpower and diet or stfu.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #30 on: March 17, 2010, 03:44:17 PM »
you reached your breaking part which pictures of bigbobs is the best motivation

Fixed  :D

newmom

  • Guest

g101

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2149
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #32 on: March 17, 2010, 03:47:59 PM »
test tren masteron eq ephedrine gh arimidex

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16128
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #33 on: March 17, 2010, 03:48:48 PM »
The last time I was "ripped" was May of 2000 when I did my show.  I had no clue what I was doing I looked like shit to be on stage and was around 8% bf.
That's usually because I get to around 225-235 and end up quiting out of laziness. Not this time.

How can you let yourself go so badly to get from 8 % to 26 % bf? I mean, seriously dude, that doesn't happen overnight.

TRIX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3550
  • If you mess with me I'll have to fuck you up
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #34 on: March 17, 2010, 03:51:16 PM »
you wont be 207 lbs at 10%, after your diet

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41300
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #35 on: March 17, 2010, 03:52:44 PM »

Fat is stored and released all the time during the day. What counts in the end is overall body composition change. I don't know any studies that have shown any effect of carbs on body composition as long as protein is high enough and total calories are adjusted for a certain rate of weight change. Do you?

Read what I put earlier and read a science book.  I have no clue where you came up with your theory because everything I'm saying is documented science.  You're using bro science...Show me the proof or disprove what I said.  I put the Doctors info down..You have it.

Many bodybuilders diet with high carbs, Chris Aceto e.g. has his clients diet on a high carbs. Many bodybuilders have tried both high and low carb diets and had great success both ways.

I didn't say there was anything wrong with high carbs.  I said EXCESS...You seem to have it in your head that you can sit down and eat any amount of carbs and as long as it's under you what you need to lose weight it wont be stored as fat...You are wrong and BTW Chris Aceto says the same thing since you want to quote him.  I have his e-book Everything You Need to Know About Fat Loss...I can e-mail it you or anyone else that wants it to prove my point and to use your own words against you.


There is no such thing as a weight loss plateau, if you stop losing weight for a few weeks, all you have to do is slightly reduce calories until you start losing weight again.


Yes there is.  When you keep doing the same 30 min of cardio on 35 it will not have the same effect it did as you first started.  The body adjust and you'll have to do alot more to lose the same amount.  BTW you just contradicted yourself when you said if you stop losing weight for a few weeks.....That is the plateau.  So you have to do either for the following to cont. to lose weight.  Exercise more or change the way you exercise from low int to high or just something different, eat less or cycle carbs to trick the body into losing weight while staying in a calorie deficit....
7

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5810
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #36 on: March 17, 2010, 03:53:55 PM »
wiggs i lost 35lbs doing this...

breakfast: 4 fried eggs on 2 dry whole wheat toast with cheese melted into eggs.

lunch: big steak + small can red kidney beans

dinner: 2 chicken breasts + big salad.

easy to follow and worked a treat.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41300
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #37 on: March 17, 2010, 03:55:04 PM »
How can you let yourself go so badly to get from 8 % to 26 % bf? I mean, seriously dude, that doesn't happen overnight.

10 years and being married 10 years.  I didn't go from 8-26.  I've been up and down.  The heaviest was 272 which was around this time last year as you guys have seen.  I got down to 234 last Oct and chilled for the winter and got back up to 258.
7

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41300
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #38 on: March 17, 2010, 03:55:57 PM »
you wont be 207 lbs at 10%, after your diet

You're probably right.  I'm guessing I'll lose muscle and be lighter. Don't care about the muscle the goal is 10% bf.
7

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #39 on: March 17, 2010, 04:09:44 PM »
Read what I put earlier and read a science book.  I have no clue where you came up with your theory because everything I'm saying is documented science.  You're using bro science...Show me the proof or disprove what I said.  I put the Doctors info down..You have it.

So do you know such studies?

I didn't say there was anything wrong with high carbs.  I said EXCESS...You seem to have it in your head that you can sit down and eat any amount of carbs and as long as it's under you what you need to lose weight it wont be stored as fat...You are wrong and BTW Chris Aceto says the same thing since you want to quote him.  I have his e-book Everything You Need to Know About Fat Loss...I can e-mail it you or anyone else that wants it to prove my point and to use your own words against you.[/b]

Yes, as long as your protein is high enough and you get enough EFAs for basic health, you can fill in the rest with carbs (regardless what type) and lose fat. I want to see one single study which shows that's not possible.

Yes there is.  When you keep doing the same 30 min of cardio on 35 it will not have the same effect it did as you first started.  The body adjust and you'll have to do alot more to lose the same amount.  BTW you just contradicted yourself when you said if you stop losing weight for a few weeks.....That is the plateau.  So you have to do either for the following to cont. to lose weight.  Exercise more or change the way you exercise from low int to high or just something different, eat less or cycle carbs to trick the body into losing weight while staying in a calorie deficit....

I say a few weeks because people tend to panic because of normal weight fluctuation. Metabolism goes down somewhat in a deficit, but usually not nearly as much as claimed. And of course you need to either lower calories or up cardio as you lose weight since the body finds a new maintenance level because of the lost weight and slightly reduced metabolism.

Cardio is fine if you can stick better to a diet higher in calories while doing cardio of course.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41300
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #40 on: March 17, 2010, 04:12:04 PM »
You didn't answer anything I said.  You keep spouting that bs.  I'm done.


You're asking me to disprove your THEORY...That's what it is.  Your THEORY is disproved with my SCIENCE.  I gave you all the reference you need to read up on.  If you want that Aceto book PM me and I'll e-mail it to you.

Instead of asking me to disprove your theory, how about you back it up with science and facts?

I still love you though. :)
7

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #41 on: March 17, 2010, 04:22:42 PM »
wiggs i don't know if its your diet thats making you cranky but wave is correct with everything he is saying.

and yes science backs this  ;)

the term you are referring too i.e. carbs being converted into fat is called De novo lipogenesis.

the study below will explain everything you need to know about this (full text is available if you google it)

however i can sum it up for you if you like : fats and carbs are basically energy sources. as long as you reduce calories from either or both you will have to burn bodyfat to make up the deficit.

protein is separate and should be maintained at 1g per pound of lean body mass throughout the diet)


De novo lipogenesis in humans: metabolic and regulatory aspects.
Hellerstein MK.

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, 94270-3104, USA.
The enzymatic pathway for converting dietary carbohydrate (CHO) into fat, or de novo lipogenesis (DNL), is present in humans, whereas the capacity to convert fats into CHO does not exist. Here, the quantitative importance of DNL in humans is reviewed, focusing on the response to increased intake of dietary CHO. Eucaloric replacement of dietary fat by CHO does not induce hepatic DNL to any substantial degree. Similarly, addition of CHO to a mixed diet does not increase hepatic DNL to quantitatively important levels, as long as CHO energy intake remains less than total energy expenditure (TEE). Instead, dietary CHO replaces fat in the whole-body fuel mixture, even in the post-absorptive state. Body fat is thereby accrued, but the pathway of DNL is not traversed; instead, a coordinated set of metabolic adaptations, including resistance of hepatic glucose production to suppression by insulin, occurs that allows CHO oxidation to increase and match CHO intake. Only when CHO energy intake exceeds TEE does DNL in liver or adipose tissue contribute significantly to the whole-body energy economy. It is concluded that DNL is not the pathway of first resort for added dietary CHO, in humans. Under most dietary conditions, the two major macronutrient energy sources (CHO and fat) are therefore not interconvertible currencies; CHO and fat have independent, though interacting, economies and independent regulation. The metabolic mechanisms and physiologic implications of the functional block between CHO and fat in humans are discussed, but require further investigation.


Also your comments on metabolic slowdown or the 'plateau' are totally false also. The reason your metabolism slows down during diet is mostly because your body mass has reduced- therefore reducing daily calorie expenditure. There are also survival mechanisms the body implements but even if the most extreme levels of this did occur you would only have to reduce calories from carbs/fat to lose more fat. This is a scientific fact.

if your metabolism actually really slowed down and plateaued i.e. t3 /t4 and various other biochemicals - you are fucked metabolically and will need to see a doctor for thyroid medication.

i have a few studies that show this conclusively also - should you not take my word for it.
175lbs by 31st July

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #42 on: March 17, 2010, 04:23:01 PM »
You didn't answer anything I said.  You keep spouting that bs.  I'm done.

You're asking me to disprove your THEORY...That's what it is.  Your THEORY is disproved with my SCIENCE.  I gave you all the reference you need to read up on.  If you want that Aceto book PM me and I'll e-mail it to you.

Instead of asking me to disprove your theory, how about you back it up with science and facts?

I still love you though. :)

I can dig up a few studies comparing low carb with high carb diets which focus on body composition. None can show a sginificant advantage of low carb or keto diets.

I'm not the biggest fan of Aceto, I just know he uses low fat diets for his clients, using carbs to adjust total calories.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #43 on: March 17, 2010, 04:24:02 PM »
thanks panda, you know I'm too lazy to dig up studies ;D

K-1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2652
  • TEAM NO MERCY!!!
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #44 on: March 17, 2010, 04:26:38 PM »
wiggs i lost 35lbs doing this...

breakfast: 4 fried eggs on 2 dry whole wheat toast with cheese melted into eggs.

lunch: big steak + small can red kidney beans

dinner: 2 chicken breasts + big salad.

easy to follow and worked a treat.

yep that's pretty straight up like I do it

I usually go to my old "faithful" when I need to drop. I lost 33 on this in 3 months when I had to drop a few. Got a little out of control it worked so well.

breakfast: Oatmeal or 2 cups total cereal or egg whites and grits (yes, i'm from the south lol) , banana or orange, apple juice

lunch: 2 chicken breasts or steak , broccoli

dinner: shrimp and vegetables or 2 chicken breast + vegetables and fruit

my wife makes really good shakes with strawberries that I drink also in between.

this never fails me.

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #45 on: March 17, 2010, 04:29:00 PM »
thanks panda, you know I'm too lazy to dig up studies ;D
;D so am i, i have 1045 on my pc and forget where they all are. i only remember that dnl one because i re-read it just the other week there.
175lbs by 31st July

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #46 on: March 17, 2010, 04:45:15 PM »
And my aplogy to Wiggs, wasn't my intention to hijack his thread.

johnnynoname

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18257
  • i have a face like a shovel
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #47 on: March 17, 2010, 04:49:13 PM »
Wiggs,
take wavelength's advice

No Patience

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1225
  • adaptation is the creator of evolution
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #48 on: March 17, 2010, 04:55:03 PM »
Wiggs,
take wavelength's advice

absolutely...i have done the bullshit every 3 hour, with stupid ratios etc etc...done it all

the day i started doing what wave preaches, i lose just as much fat, have more energy,
never feel guilt, and cravings are minimal compared to before....and best part is i never
feel flat which is a mental killer when dieting


Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41300
  • An Ethnic Israelite
Re: This fucking diet is driving me fuckin nuts. Jeezus!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« Reply #49 on: March 17, 2010, 04:56:18 PM »
Panda one study proved nothing...And this is coming from STANFORD and HARVARD...

Although his September 2007 release Good Calories, Bad Calories has been met with much skepticism and criticism by those deeply entrenched in the conventional wisdom about diet and health who have interviewed him over the past couple of months since its release, New York Times science journalist Gary Taubes is adamant that the more than five years of research he conducted is merely the BEGINNING regarding the hypothesis that it is carbohydrates that is the root cause of obesity and other health-related diseases in people with a certain genetic disorder making them highly susceptible to rapid weight gain when they consume carbs of any kind. And he's definitely not alone now in this assertion within the medical community.

Dr. Andrew Weil understood it right away after reading Taubes' bestselling book as does Dr. David Ludwig who shared his own study recently on the ill effects of carbohydrates on the condition known as "fatty liver" disease. Now brand new research on the negative impact of carbs on weight and health sanctioned by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is adding yet another layer of scientific truth and confirmation to what most of us who are livin' la vida low-carb already knew.

Lead researcher James M. Ntambi , PhD, Katherine Berns Von Donk Steenbock Professor of Biochemistry and Nutritional Sciences at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and his team of researchers have discovered a specific gene in the liver known as SCD-1, short for stearoyl-Coenzyme A desaturase 1. I like SCD-1 better, don't you? :)

It turns out this SCD-1 gene may be the culprit in why some people who eat a high-carb diet keep gaining and gaining weight while others who consume the same diet don't. Apparently, this gene actually causes dietary carbs to be turned into stored body fat rather than being broken down for energy. Conversely, mice that did not have SCD-1 in their liver were able to use the carbohydrates instead of having it turn to fat. Hmmmmmm...


Dr. Ntambi even fed a starchy, sugary diet to mice without SCD-1 in their liver and the excessive carbohydrates were used up and not stored. In other words, the carbs were not a contributing factor to any weight gain in the mice without SCD-1. But normal functioning livers in the control mice with the presence of SCD-1 saw just the opposite happen--the high-carb diet they consumed quickly poured on body fat by eating the exact same food.


In the battle against the bulge, Dr. Ntambi said his study shows that genetic liver function seems to play a more critical role than thought that may react differently in people with varying levels of the SCD-1 gene.



"It looks like the SCD gene in the liver is responsible for causing weight gain in response to a high-carbohydrate diet, because when we take away the gene's activity the animals no longer gain the weight," he said. "These findings are telling us that the liver is a key tissue in mediating weight gain induced by excess carbohydrates."



The results of this study were published in the December 5, 2007 issue of Cell Metabolism .



Well, look what we have here. As much as the so-called health "experts" like Glenn Gaesser go around ignorantly spouting off their mouth about how consuming a high-carb, sugary diet is perfectly fine for people to manage their weight, along comes a monkey wrench in that theory that is invariably tied to genetics. It makes you wonder just how many people are walking around and have this SCD-1 factor going on in their liver. While I don't know for sure, I'd be willing to bet with high probability that this explains how I got to 410 pounds back in 2004 and why carbohydrate restriction worked so well for me to shed over 180 pounds.


And the eye-opening results of this study are not lost on Dr. Ntambi who believes this study should open the door for even more research into the damning role of carbohydrates in weight gain and producing excessive stored fat. He sees this as a solid first step in bringing about major changes in how obesity is treated in the future.



If it can be determined that SCD-1 exists in a more concentrated form among the overweight and obese, then the golden opportunity to offer a natural, dietary solution like livin' la vida low-carb to them exists and should be actively promoted to them.



"We think that obese individuals, in general, may have higher SCD activity in both the liver and in adipose tissue," Dr. Ntambi explained. "So, they may have a higher capability of converting carbohydrate into fat."



This is some of the most amazing research in favor of low-carb as a viable option for people struggling with weight issues to come out over the past few years because it lends credibility to the idea that lowering your carbohydrates is a very good thing for a whole lot of people. We already know from this Harvard study that people with high insulin levels don't do well on a high-carb, low-fat diet. Perhaps they have this SCD-1 gene, too. It's an exciting development for people like me who found merit in this way of eating independent from what my doctor and common societal knowledge told me was right. I believe this study could be a godsend for others who struggle being overweight, too, because it could convince them to take charge of their own weight and health like I did.



Sadly, the Standard American Diet (SAD) is chock full of carbohydrates galore no thanks in part to ridiculous food ingredients such as high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) that shows up in just about everything nowadays, especially soft drinks and candy. It's disgusting how little outrage there is over the presence of HFCS in so much of what we eat while people go around getting their panties in a wad over seeing a little bit of saturated fat on a food label (scaremongering by the American Heart Association and their "Bad Fat Brothers" campaign hasn't helped matters either). UGH! Are we bassackwards regarding nutrition nowadays or what?



Perhaps this is the kind of research that will FINALLY get the traditionalists to think outside the box and realize there is something more to the idea that consuming sugar is unhealthy and not conducive to weight management because of a genetic predisposition. Whether that has ever been clearly articulated before, it certainly has now with this study.


"This is a very good example of a diet-gene interaction," Dr. Ntambi noted.



In fact, this latest research is part of an ongoing look at other parts of the body where SCD-1 may exist, such as the liver, muscles, brain, pancreas and adipose tissue to see what would happen. When SCD-1 was nonexistent, it didn't matter how many carbohydrates the researchers fed the mice--THEY DIDN'T GAIN A POUND! It makes me wonder if my wife Christine is fortunate enough to have a low amount of SCD-1 in her body since she can get away with eating A LOT MORE CARBS than I can and maintain her weight (ya know, it makes me sick!). :D



Interestingly, Dr. Ntambi found a rather peculiar and distinctive dichotomy among those mice that lacked the SCD-1 gene--they GAINED weight on a diet higher in fat versus a diet high in sugary carbs and low in fat which protected their health as well. In other words, a low-carb diet provided no weight management benefit to them which lends credence to my philosophy that people need to find the nutritional plan that works for THEM and follow that individualized program to properly take care of their own weight and health.



So what does all this mean? The first thing that pops in my mind is how utterly meaningless and ridiculous it is to have universal health recommendations for the general population. While a low-fat diet has long been trumpeted as "healthy" for everyone, that's obviously just not true. Now more than ever we need to see the low-carb diet promoted alongside the low-fat diet as another option for those people with this SCD-1 condition. Otherwise, you're destined to keep those people fat for the rest of their lives because they'll constantly get frustrated when their weight fails to stabilize on a fat-restricted diet.



I'm thinking out loud here, but there ought to be a test where people can determine what the level of SCD-1 in their liver is. I'm not a doctor, but it doesn't seem like this would be very hard if you did a biopsy or blood test of the liver to see. Those who have a strong presence of the gene should be placed on a strict low-carb diet regimen and those with little to no SCD-1 (ostensibly thinner by default) would be placed on a strict high-carb, low-fat diet.



In the mice that did not have any SCD-1, glucose production was basically shut down which prevented excessive insulin to be created in the body but subsequently led to an increased risk of hypoglycemia, or low blood sugar (which is why a high-carb diet is necessary for blood sugar management for them). Additionally, glycogen stores are not able to be created because the oleic acid, which helps with the breakdown of carbs, is rendered useless since the body converts them into energy.



"It looks to us that if you don't have enough oleic acid - which the SCD enzyme makes - then the carbohydrate does not proceed through normal glucose metabolism," Dr. Ntambi concluded.



To confirm this, the researchers added oleic acid supplements to the diet of these SCD-1 lacking mice and their metabolism returned to normal function. But it looks like the more carbs consumed, the higher amount of SCD-1 is present which can produce an overflow of oleic acid which then leads to stored fat and thus obesity. So it's never a good idea to go too overboard on the carbohydrates, simple or otherwise, as has been previously suggested and encouraged many times before by supposedly educated health "experts."



Dr. Ntambi agrees.



"Too much carbohydrate is not good," he remarked. "That's basically what we are saying."



Well, it's about time SOMEBODY in the medical research world said it and I hope this is merely the start of an exciting new trend. My desire is that this research will continue forward by Dr. Ntambi and other courageous researchers willing to let the data speak for itself without being dictated b any preconceived notions or low-fat dogma . And it looks like Dr. Mary C. Vernon's dream that the NIH would begin funding more low-carb studies is coming to fruition. The ball is now moving forward on the research, so I'm ready to see even more of it in the coming years! BRING IT ON!!!

You can e-mail Dr. James Ntambi about his remarkable research on the role of the SCD-1 gene in the liver and the negative role it plays when combined with a high-carb diet at ntambi@biochem.wisc.edu . We need to encourage MORE of these kind of studies to be conducted, so share your positive comments with him about this one.




THE OTHER ONE...

http://livinlavidalocarb.blogspot.com/2007/05/study-high-carb-low-fat-diet.html
7