Wow!
I've never seen that video... I just guessed that the video wouldn't show a 24'' arm... but somehow I was still right.
How was I so right... maybe because I know 55 cm is 21.7 inches.
...maybe because no one under 400 lbs has a 24'' arm.
The Luke
did you take a look at the vid I posted? Plus, you are neglecting body composition, and people who prioritize bodyparts. Also have you seen that arm wrestler who looks like a fiddler crab, one arm has been overworked the other Underworked. I don't know how big his arm is, or his weight, but if you saw the numbers on paper, you'd say "no way"
when Ronnie was on stage in 1999 and in 2003, his arms looked way bigger than 21s. This was when he was on. And not traveling. You know the variables. Food, training, etc.
Now math on paper my work, but in real life it doesn't always. For instance, many car companies say their car will do "200+", which is called their theoritical top speed, but in the real world many times it doesn't pan out. Either due to wind, tires, gearing, lack of space, or it just doesn't pan out, even though he numbers say it will.
For instance, it was found out by Road&Track that the Ferrari F50 did not have a higher top speed than it's predecessor, the F40, in fact it was lower than the F40. Ferrari had stated a 200+ top speed, it just touched 198.
So just because you throw numbers up, many times in the real world, it can bd proven wrong.