You said you had facts, I did not. 
Why don't you tell me something I don't know.
I know all rounds are physique rounds. Meaning symmetry, muscular development and posing are all taken into consideration in each round, plus the rest of the criteria.
I also know that if a pose is called side tricep, it doesn't mean only the tricep is getting analyzed, but the whole physique.
I just letting you know of this in case you try to "correct" me of not knowing.
Yes, I know this is how it all works. I said that Shawn's quads gave him an advantage in that particular pose since the rest of the muscle groups visible in that pose were pretty much even between the two.
I can see muscular bulk being an advantage for Dorian, but how about Shawn's arms, delts and legs being better developed despite his lighter weight.
Dorian had an advantage in density, but Shawn was greatly conditioned too. So he wasn't as far behind as you like to think.
Balance and proportion? I would say they were pretty equal, but Shawn had advantage in this criteria in some poses.
Shawn's posing was always better.
Shawn was not dwarfed by Dorian in this pose if you actually are careful to see it. Dorian's lats were wider, but Shawn's didn't disappear. How about Dorian's narrow looking quads? His lack of vastus lateralis?
Dorian had better calves, Shawn had better quads, which were more proportionate in the leg development?
All criteria taken into consideration and every muscle group assesed. Dorian wins, but not dominating.
You said you had facts, I did not.
I said it was a fact and if you disagree with the facts the onus is on you to prove them wrong
Why don't you tell me something I don't know.
I know all rounds are physique rounds. Meaning symmetry, muscular development and posing are all taken into consideration in each round, plus the rest of the criteria.
bullshit you did if you did then you'd know Shawn couldn't beat Dorian because his quads were more developed
I also know that if a pose is called side tricep, it doesn't mean only the tricep is getting analyzed, but the whole physique.
I just letting you know of this in case you try to "correct" me of not knowing.
again entertaining you'd did know this you'd know then Shawn doesn't beat Dorian in the ab-thigh in fact doesn't fucking come close
Yes, I know this is how it all works. I said that Shawn's quads gave him an advantage in that particular pose since the rest of the muscle groups visible in that pose were pretty much even between the two.
LMFAO pretty much even , their backs are pretty much even? their calves? their chests? you're delusional and your opinion is just flat out stupid
I can see muscular bulk being an advantage for Dorian, but how about Shawn's arms, delts and legs being better developed despite his lighter weight.
Dorian had an advantage in density, but Shawn was greatly conditioned too. So he wasn't as far behind as you like to think.
Balance and proportion? I would say they were pretty equal, but Shawn had advantage in this criteria in some poses.
Better? wow that was a blanket statement , not points , no elaboration we'll just take your word all those parts are better
and it's easy to be hard and dry when you're 205 pounds but next to impossible at 260 pounds , density & dryness don't mean much when you can't back it up with muscular bulk and Shawn couldn't , Shawn tried to compete at 215lbs one year and guess what his conditioning suffered for it
balance & proportion Dorian has the clear advantage even with the torn bicep ! and Shawn does meet part(s) of the criteria better than Dorian in certain poses but that's not how it's done , Dorian has meets more of the criteria better than Shawn in ALL of the criteria and that's how it works
Shawn's posing was always better.
Shawn was not dwarfed by Dorian in this pose if you actually are careful to see it. Dorian's lats were wider, but Shawn's didn't disappear. How about Dorian's narrow looking quads? His lack of vastus lateralis?
Dorian had better calves, Shawn had better quads, which were more proportionate in the leg development?
All criteria taken into consideration and every muscle group assesed. Dorian wins, but not dominating.
Another blanket statement Shawn's posing was always better
why? elaborate because he twirls around? and poses slow?
and once again I have to explain to you that even in the posing rounds ALL of the judging criteria is assessed , in the posing rounds the judges are looking for who has the superior muscular bulk , who is the densest , driest , who has better balance , you don't know how contests are judged especially with this dumb statement
Shawn was dwarfed by Dorian NOT even close , not even open for discussion anything to the contrary wont be entertained. and don't cherry-pick what you think wins a contest. You think Shawn wins because he has better quads , yet worse calves and worse proportion in his legs? Shawn had short legs , high calves this my friend isn't a greatly balanced and proportionate leg , much to learn you have
Dorian won in dominating fashion it's ironic you keep mentioning Shawn when in fact he was a very distant fourth , Dorian was so far ahead in all aspects of the judging criteria there was no one even close to him , Paul Dillett in fact said about Yates at the 1995 Mr Olympia that " I've seen Jesus Christ and he looks like Dorian Yates " this is coming from someone who rarely gives any compliments to fellow competitors , his combo in 1995 was just as dominate as it was in 1993 , there was NO contest Dorian won from the moment he stepped on-stage
