I knew..........
It means Shawn had some advantages over Dorian, which shows he wasn't dominated. He still lost in the overall picture no doubt about it.
I definitively prefer Shawn's physique over Dorian's.
I exaggerated a bit with the stumbling thing, but Shawn was better poser.
For you and the judges for sure. For me he wins that pose.
For his height his legs are not short, you're not looking at the bigger picture. If someone is taller, like Dorian, of course he is going to have longer legs.
When I can't see a nicely developed vastus lateralis muscle, I see incomplete quad development in Dorian. I see Shawn having better leg development than Dorian and better leg proportion too.
I know, Dorian met more of the criteria better than Shawn, which is why he won. There is no need for you to repeat that, I'm just saying Shawn wasn't too far behind.
I knew..........
It means Shawn had some advantages over Dorian, which shows he wasn't dominated. He still lost in the overall picture no doubt about it.
You're getting lost now and are reduced to just repeating the same shit over and over. Shawn was dominated in every aspect of the judging criteria Shawn wasn't close on paper or in reality , Dorian was head & shoulders above everyone in 1995 especially the fourth place finisher Shawn Ray , you can keep typing the contrary it doesn't change the facts
I definitively prefer Shawn's physique over Dorian's.
I exaggerated a bit with the stumbling thing, but Shawn was better poser.
Contests aren't judged on your preferences , and no kidding you're exaggerating because you're not working with much , Shawn was a better poser ( according to you ) but all rounds are physique rounds so he wasn't in the judges eyes
For you and the judges for sure. For me he wins that pose.
and the judges are the only ones who matter , last time I checked Sandow was on the trophy and not JP_RC contests aren't judged according to your whims
For his height his legs are not short, you're not looking at the bigger picture. If someone is taller, like Dorian, of course he is going to have longer legs.
When I can't see a nicely developed vastus lateralis muscle, I see incomplete quad development in Dorian. I see Shawn having better leg development than Dorian and better leg proportion too.
I know, Dorian met more of the criteria better than Shawn, which is why he won. There is no need for you to repeat that, I'm just saying Shawn wasn't too far behind.
NO actually not true , Nasser is technically taller than Dorian let his legs are shorter and he has a longer torso. Dorian's quad was torn in 94 which is why the development is obscured doesn't mean it's incomplete just torn. but okay I'll entertain your point lets says his quads were better now what? it doesn't do much when you're behind everywhere else , but let me say it for you " for me Shawn has blah blah blah " NOT how it works
Shawn has better leg development than Dorian? another blanket statement , lets talk about muscles of the legs , leg biceps , satorious , rectus femoris , quads , calves and how they all relate to each other . Shawn lets say has an edge in quads , how about satorious? NO , calves? HELL NO , leg biceps? NO leg length? NO . low inserting calves ? NO
Shawn's quads are sitting ontop of high calves this alone ruins lower leg balance NO escaping this fact , Shawn's calves were pretty well developed but very high and lacked proportion you think better quads relegates this moot? I don't think so , but I digress contests aren't judged by what you see because we've already established you're not a judge
And no need to keep repeating myself? ironic you claim that
and you can continue to claim Dorian wasn't leaps & bounds ahead of Shawn in 1995 it changes nothing facts are facts , and no need to you to keep denying them
