You're getting lost now and are reduced to just repeating the same shit over and over. Shawn was dominated in every aspect of the judging criteria Shawn wasn't close on paper or in reality , Dorian was head & shoulders above everyone in 1995 especially the fourth place finisher Shawn Ray , you can keep typing the contrary it doesn't change the facts
Contests aren't judged on your preferences , and no kidding you're exaggerating because you're not working with much , Shawn was a better poser ( according to you ) but all rounds are physique rounds so he wasn't in the judges eyes
and the judges are the only ones who matter , last time I checked Sandow was on the trophy and not JP_RC contests aren't judged according to your whims
NO actually not true , Nasser is technically taller than Dorian let his legs are shorter and he has a longer torso. Dorian's quad was torn in 94 which is why the development is obscured doesn't mean it's incomplete just torn. but okay I'll entertain your point lets says his quads were better now what? it doesn't do much when you're behind everywhere else , but let me say it for you " for me Shawn has blah blah blah " NOT how it works
Shawn has better leg development than Dorian? another blanket statement , lets talk about muscles of the legs , leg biceps , satorious , rectus femoris , quads , calves and how they all relate to each other . Shawn lets say has an edge in quads , how about satorious? NO , calves? HELL NO , leg biceps? NO leg length? NO . low inserting calves ? NO
Shawn's quads are sitting ontop of high calves this alone ruins lower leg balance NO escaping this fact , Shawn's calves were pretty well developed but very high and lacked proportion you think better quads relegates this moot? I don't think so , but I digress contests aren't judged by what you see because we've already established you're not a judge
And no need to keep repeating myself? ironic you claim that 
and you can continue to claim Dorian wasn't leaps & bounds ahead of Shawn in 1995 it changes nothing facts are facts , and no need to you to keep denying them 
You're getting lost now and are reduced to just repeating the same shit over and over. Shawn was dominated in every aspect of the judging criteria Shawn wasn't close on paper or in reality , Dorian was head & shoulders above everyone in 1995 especially the fourth place finisher Shawn Ray , you can keep typing the contrary it doesn't change the facts
Contests aren't judged on your preferences , and no kidding you're exaggerating because you're not working with much , Shawn was a better poser ( according to you ) but all rounds are physique rounds so he wasn't in the judges eyes
and the judges are the only ones who matter , last time I checked Sandow was on the trophy and not JP_RC contests aren't judged according to your whims
We're getting nowhere here ND, you can't understand what I'm trying to say. You're a little bit close minded and guide yourself on what the judges had to say instead trying to see what constitutes a great complete physique.
Now I see why Hulkster got tired of arguing with you. Let's just say I think Dorian didn't dominate and you think he did.
NO actually not true , Nasser is technically taller than Dorian let his legs are shorter and he has a longer torso. Dorian's quad was torn in 94 which is why the development is obscured doesn't mean it's incomplete just torn.
Nasser has some structural flaws, his legs are a bit short for his long torso. Shawn's legs weren't.
I didn't mean that when someone is tall his legs have to be long. All I said is that Dorian had longer legs than Shawn because he was taller, but both men's legs were proportionate in length to their torsos.
Shawn has better leg development than Dorian? another blanket statement , lets talk about muscles of the legs , leg biceps , satorious , rectus femoris , quads , calves and how they all relate to each other . Shawn lets say has an edge in quads , how about satorious? NO , calves? HELL NO , leg biceps? NO leg length? NO . low inserting calves ? NO
Shawn's quads are sitting ontop of high calves this alone ruins lower leg balance NO escaping this fact , Shawn's calves were pretty well developed but very high and lacked proportion you think better quads relegates this moot? I don't think so , but I digress contests aren't judged by what you see because we've already established you're not a judge
Shawn's quads are better developed than Dorian's quads. No blanket statement, I already said Dorian quads lacked complete development of the vastus lateralis muscle and even the rectus femoris isn't fully developed compared to his top competiton. His quads also lacked separations and striations compared to his top competiton. I even think Shawn's hamstrings were proportionately developed to his quads in a better way than Dorian. Shawn's high calves did throw the proportions of his legs off a bit, but I don't see Dorian's legs being perfect either.
Just as Shawn's high, but well developed calves, harm his leg proportion; doesn't Dorian's underdeveloped, narrow looking quads harm his leg proportions too? Especially when he has those amazing calves? Did his upper leg development always match up his calves develpment?
Let's say it did and in 1995 his legs were proportionate in itself. How about the bigger picture, where his legs and arms proportionate to his massive back and torso? I think not, especially when compared to his top competiton.
Despite all of this, Dorian still won fairly. No dispute in that, but he had disadvantages that prevented him from dominating.
