Author Topic: Real Pilots Speak Out on 911 (Read 25040 times)

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #225 on:** May 17, 2010, 10:14:30 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on May 17, 2010, 10:09:40 AM

Hey, 33, I could ask the same Q of you, when you post these silly accusations about obama.

So, you believe the state of hawaii, mccain, hilary, congress - EVERYONE is is on this massive secret so a kenyan can crash our economy for some secret group whose members you dont know. But you 'feel it', right?

I can personally admit Obama's record STINKS without making you answer dozens of questions where you could not POSSIBLY have the answers. The same thing applies here. 911 stinks. It's that simple. it would be impossible to answer the Qs you pose, and you know that, but it's a handy dodge.

You're a CTer because you know something stinks about the obama early days. I'm a CTer because I know something stinks about 911. it's as easy as that.

I said I dont know about Obama's BC since he has paid ! Million Dollars to keep his records secret.

240 is Back · « **Reply #226 on:** May 17, 2010, 10:16:42 AM »

"LOL bro the majority of the science community feels that it wasnt a CT..."

Link please.

"I said I dont know about Obama's BC"

LOL... come on dude, sack up... Don't be one of those fence-setters saying "I dunno, what you guys think..." while posting ten times a day on Obama's mystery past. You think it stinks, right? Is that fair to say?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #227 on:** May 17, 2010, 10:17:35 AM »

Yes his record stinks, but i have tried to back up my claims and at least take the next step to plausible realistic conclusions.

tonymctones · « **Reply #228 on:** May 17, 2010, 10:56:34 AM »

there is a difference 240 3333 is open to debate and looking at facts from either side, you however are not you come in here post a few things that are for the most part easily debunked and then you dont address the points debunking your CT...

now again run away like you always do

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #229 on:** May 17, 2010, 10:58:20 AM »

I'm just saying. If we are going to have a CT debate - fine, lets discuss it. But while we are at it, it seems to me that the plausability factor should be right up there in any discussion.

quadzilla456 · « **Reply #230 on:** May 17, 2010, 11:12:12 AM »

Ok let's debate then:

Question 1: Why is the grass at the Pentagon undisturbed after a plane flew 500 miles per hour a couple of feet above the ground and slammed into the ground level of the Pentagon?

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #231 on:** May 17, 2010, 11:15:12 AM »

Do, its not going to work that way. You say its a missle, and we need to look at what actually would have to take place for that to happen.

quadzilla456 · « **Reply #232 on:** May 17, 2010, 11:35:07 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on May 17, 2010, 11:15:12 AM

Do, its not going to work that way. You say its a missile, and we need to look at what actually would have to take place for that to happen.

You said you wanted to debate. Here we have evidence in front of us: an undisturbed lawn. This is photo evidence. This should be easy. One question at a time. Debate it and then move on to the next question.

For us to starting debating how it was actually planned is impossible because we would be guessing and making assumptions. You need physical evidence to do that. We don't have it because the actions of classified personnel is first of all based on what is being released to the public by potential criminals and unverifiable. Go watch Columbo. He has to start with evidence first and then get to the conclusion.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #233 on:** May 17, 2010, 11:41:59 AM »

Quote from: quadzilla456 on May 17, 2010, 11:35:07 AM

You said you wanted to debate. Here we have evidence in front of us: an undisturbed lawn. This is photo evidence. This should be easy. One question at a time. Debate it and then move on to the next question.

For us to starting debating how it was actually planned is impossible because we would be guessing and making assumptions. You need physical evidence to do that. We don't have it because the actions of classified personnel is first of all based on what is being released to the public by potential criminals and unverifiable. Go watch Columbo. He has to start with evidence first and then get to the conclusion.

You want me to engage in speculation and open ended discussions, while we have a video and pics of the building with actual parts from the airplane. We have missing 58 passengers and crew, we have popular mechanics' expose ect.

So why dont we discuss concrete picrueres and evidence as opposed to my uninformed speculation?

quadzilla456 · « **Reply #234 on:** May 17, 2010, 08:39:55 PM »

333 - bro, I agree with you on a lot of things. I think it is best not to dwell on this topic anymore nothing is to be gained from it. In my mind I am not satisfied with the explanation for 9/11. But I respect everyone else's opinion. That means all of you scrotums (j/k) out there!

Peace.

tonymctones · « **Reply #235 on:** May 17, 2010, 08:47:35 PM »

Quote from: quadzilla456 on May 17, 2010, 08:39:55 PM

333 - bro, I agree with you on a lot of things. I think it is best not to dwell on this topic anymore nothing is to be gained from it. In my mind I am not satisfied with the explanation for 9/11. But I respect everyone else's opinion. That means all of you scrotums (j/k) out there!

Peace.

NOOOO come back I want to hear you and 240's explination for the ppl on the plane, the pilots, the wreckage they found at the site?

this is exactly the problem that we have been talking about with CT'ers you guys can not refute the evidence to disprove your CT...

12secGT · « **Reply #236 on:** May 18, 2010, 01:33:47 PM »

Quote from: quadzilla456 on May 17, 2010, 08:39:55 PM

333 - bro, I agree with you on a lot of things. I think it is best not to dwell on this topic anymore nothing is to be gained from it. In my mind I am not satisfied with the explanation for 9/11. But I respect everyone else's opinion. That means all of you scrotums (j/k) out there!

Peace.

Scrotums??? Ok, NOW I'M BACK!!!! hahaha... j/k. Good idea. Let's leave it at those words spoken by you... upto the genitalia references... fvckface!

Emmortal · « **Reply #237 on:** May 19, 2010, 01:14:29 AM »

I can't believe a 757 hit the pentagon and didn't cause more damage than that. The simple fact that the amount of kinetic energy being carried by a plane of that mass traveling at that speed would cause an explosion 5 times the size it did, not to mention at the very least much more damage to the building, lawn and surrounding area.

Now, could a smaller plane have it it? Sure, that's certainly plausible, but a 757, I just can't logically believe that given the pictures and video released. Obviously something hit it, there was some debris of a plane and a brief glimpse of an object on the video, but there's just no way a 757 hit it.

Is it a conspiracy? I don't know nor do I care. I'd like to see another investigation done but I fear too much has already been shuffled away or "lost" to really give us any more information.

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #238 on:** August 23, 2010, 09:17:09 AM »

BBBUUUMMMPPPP

blacken700 · « **Reply #239 on:** August 23, 2010, 09:22:58 AM »

i said towers not pentagon keep looking

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #240 on:** August 23, 2010, 09:25:40 AM »

Quote from: blacken700 on August 23, 2010, 09:22:58 AM

i said towers not pentagon keep looking

Please, you are a CT nut and you are fucking so disgraced after this you have nowhere to hide.

blacken700 · « **Reply #241 on:** August 23, 2010, 09:28:13 AM »

ha ha keep looking, like i said you lie

blacken700 · « **Reply #242 on:** August 23, 2010, 09:36:41 AM »

333386 thinks the towers and the pentagon are the same buildings

Fury · « **Reply #243 on:** August 23, 2010, 09:52:07 AM »

Quote from: 333386 on August 23, 2010, 09:17:09 AM

BBBUUUMMMPPPP

That's an owning. Not like Blacken the retard had any credibility before but this is pretty amusing.

What an embarrassment.

blacken700 · « **Reply #244 on:** August 23, 2010, 10:09:28 AM »

ha ha ha your wrong again, hey but keep checking everyones spelling

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #245 on:** May 03, 2011, 12:07:24 PM »

BUMP

blacken700 · « **Reply #246 on:** May 03, 2011, 12:32:15 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on May 03, 2011, 12:07:24 PM

BUMP

little guy bored again

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #247 on:** May 03, 2011, 12:33:53 PM »

Quote from: blacken700 on May 03, 2011, 12:32:15 PM

little guy bored again

No - just admit that for 8 years you were dead wrong on your traitorous 911 CT's.

blacken700 · « **Reply #248 on:** May 03, 2011, 12:35:57 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on May 03, 2011, 12:33:53 PM

No - just admit that for 8 years you were dead wrong on your traitorous 911 CT's.

what are you talking about mr lawyer

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #249 on:** May 03, 2011, 12:37:53 PM »

Quote from: blacken700 on May 03, 2011, 12:35:57 PM

what are you talking about mr lawyer

You know damn well what I am talking about. You communists, leftists, and treasonous pofs libs for 8 years engaged in these 911 CT's saying Bush was behind 911, yet now revel in bin ladens death.