how does this support dorian being better than nasser or ronnie? it doesn't. don't try to change the subject, where's proof that dorian is the best.
PS yes we know dorian won the show but that doesn't mean he deserved to, if you think the best bodybuilder always wins the show you must have a very short attention span.
Negative, look, fact is, no matter what anyone says or shows you, youre just gonna say Nasser is better and Ronnie is better, youve made up your mind, and its not going to change. Im not going to waste my time.
Ive been trying to do this with Hulkster for 3 years and I finally gave up, im not gonna start it up again.
Fact - Dorian was just as large, FAR better conditioning, HAD A BACK (the back is not just a single muscle, its a complex group made up of MANY large muscles, Im sure you know that, but its not a FRONT bodybuilding contest, the whole body needs to be there, Dorian had "weak" biceps (and not at his best in 93), Nasser was missing EVERY muscle in his back from the below the traps, NO conditioning on the back, etc. Nasser = Massively incomplete BB. But youve already said that you thought nasser was better, he "just" didnt have a back. Lol.
BB is judged on three things, Muscular Bulk, Conditioning, and Balance and Proportion, and by those catagories, Dorian beat Nasser every time except for the possible exception of 97. Balance and proportion is top to bottom FRONT TO BACK, BB is not judged on which bodyparts are better than the competition.

Not to mention Dorians conditioning is legendary, Youll barely ever hear of Nassers conditioning, except from TEAM NASSER> lol.
I think Dorian was so injured and so far off (97) that Nasser should have won that year. Dorian had torn Bi's and Tri and leg I believe, and he couldnt train his arms for weaks before the contest, so they looked tiny and atrophed.
Anyway thats it, im not getting into again.;