Perhaps universities shouldn't even bother with having professors because kids these days know everything.
The parents should probably die from the embarrassment associated with having a kid that weak-minded. But not in America, they'll coddle him and say how mean that man was for hurting his poor widdle feelings.
We need to bring the draft back and weed out some of these twats.
Arguing only a tenured professor can risk offending some douche is too stupid for serious discussion.
adjunct professors are the very definition of a part-time worker
any employer who's been around for awhile knows the benefits of hiring someone as part-time rather than full time and one of those benefit is the ease at which you can lay them off or just reducing their hours until they quit on their own.
As usual on this site people run off in the direction of their own bias without even having the facts.
this thread is based on one story on Fox about a guy who claims he was not RE-HIRED due to remarks he made. This is his claim and not necessarily the fact and the case and even if it were completely true the nature of his position makes this perfectly acceptable. It could just as easily be office politics or budegting or any of a bunch of different reasons including budgeting, changes in curriculim, etc...
I see nothing in the definition of his type of employment that gives him any reason to expect to be rehired and that makes him nothing but a whining little pussy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professors_in_the_United_States#Adjunct_professor