Author Topic: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??  (Read 30232 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #50 on: July 19, 2010, 03:25:27 PM »
peak Ronnie wasn't in Dorian's league , he knows it just his dumb fans have a tough time accepting reality.

spoken like a true guy.. ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #51 on: July 19, 2010, 03:34:21 PM »
spoken like a true guy.. ::)


I guess that makes Ronnie a ' guy ' too huh? seeing he's stated this MANY times  ;)

and a guy would be in a thread bitching about people using morphed pics when in fact he's done it for a LONG time now  ;)

run along bitch , Ronnie's already confirmed Dorian had the freakiest back he ever seen and he couldn't touch him ever  ;)

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #52 on: July 19, 2010, 03:37:00 PM »
Nothing gay about this picture at all


ThaRealist

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3393
  • Team REal LiFe
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #53 on: July 19, 2010, 03:39:16 PM »

I guess that makes Ronnie a ' guy ' too huh? seeing he's stated this MANY times  ;)

and a guy would be in a thread bitching about people using morphed pics when in fact he's done it for a LONG time now  ;)

run along bitch , Ronnie's already confirmed Dorian had the freakiest back he ever seen and he couldn't touch him ever  ;)


That is because ronnie's back was so big he couldn't see it for himself, so in turn he was telling the truth about freakiest back he has ever seen 8) 8)
You Can't Do It!!!

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #54 on: July 19, 2010, 03:43:00 PM »

That is because ronnie's back was so big he couldn't see it for himself, so in turn he was telling the truth about freakiest back he has ever seen 8) 8)

yeah poor nutt-huggers tried this before too  :-\ poor guys , no matter what turn they take they always get own in the end by Ronnie conceding Dorian was better  ;D


Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #55 on: July 19, 2010, 06:04:34 PM »
team dorian has to make a lot of claims and spit out opinions, but they can't do much in the way of pictures or hard evidence



now they will probably start the usual "you're a troll" "just because you don't like dorian" "guy"
but nothing really to prove me wrong

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #56 on: July 19, 2010, 06:06:48 PM »
team dorian has to make a lot of claims and spit out opinions, but they can't do much in the way of pictures or hard evidence



now they will probably start the usual "you're a troll" "just because you don't like dorian" "guy"
but nothing really to prove me wrong

wow a gimmick complaining about being called a guy and a troll  :-\


ThaRealist

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3393
  • Team REal LiFe
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #57 on: July 19, 2010, 06:09:38 PM »
yeah poor nutt-huggers tried this before too  :-\ poor guys , no matter what turn they take they always get own in the end by Ronnie conceding Dorian was better  ;D



Your so far up Dorian's ass you couldn't see the sarcasm lol
You Can't Do It!!!

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #58 on: July 19, 2010, 06:13:35 PM »
wow a gimmick complaining about being called a guy and a troll  :-\


see now he's trying to claim I am a gimmick or that I'm complaining, I've read you like a book.

you have a very short attention span and lose your temper too easy, I say ronnie > dorian, you just try to trash talk me

saucetradomous

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3000
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #59 on: July 19, 2010, 06:13:35 PM »
IRONY ALERT

Hulkster bitching about morphed pics  ;)

and ' far superior ' my ass Ronnie himself said in 2003 the freakiest back he ever seen belong to Yates , so pwned by your own fucking hero again fan-boy

Ofcourse.. Ronnie cannot see his own back

anyways.. Ronnie trumps Yates but stubbs slightly betters them both in that department.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #60 on: July 19, 2010, 06:14:22 PM »
Quote
team dorian has to make a lot of claims and spit out opinions, but they can't do much in the way of pictures or hard evidence

they never have.

the pics and videos have always shown ronnie to be better.

thats why they always had to resort to bullshit like the 99 vids/screenshots being faked, that dorian looked better in person but that no other pro in history did etc etc.

its always them vs. the ronnie visuals.

the dorian visuals were never enough and they know it.

pathetic, isn't it? ::)

just admit what the visuals already show: that ronnie was better and move on.

but instead, they cling to their excuses and fantasies. ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #61 on: July 19, 2010, 06:18:33 PM »
see now he's trying to claim I am a gimmick or that I'm complaining, I've read you like a book.

you have a very short attention span and lose your temper too easy, I say ronnie > dorian, you just try to trash talk me


You are a gimmick no doubts and you are complaining

anyway here is Doria NOT at his best blowing Coleman out of the water in the back department at his best

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #62 on: July 19, 2010, 06:20:19 PM »
Ofcourse.. Ronnie cannot see his own back

anyways.. Ronnie trumps Yates but stubbs slightly betters them both in that department.

yeah Ronnie's never seen a pic or video of his back  ::) everyone likes to make a lot of excuses for Ronnie a common theme whenever he concedes to Yates

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #63 on: July 19, 2010, 06:20:57 PM »
they never have.

the pics and videos have always shown ronnie to be better.

thats why they always had to resort to bullshit like the 99 vids/screenshots being faked, that dorian looked better in person but that no other pro in history did etc etc.

its always them vs. the ronnie visuals.

the dorian visuals were never enough and they know it.

pathetic, isn't it? ::)

just admit what the visuals already show: that ronnie was better and move on.

but instead, they cling to their excuses and fantasies. ::)
now they will probably say we are just "picking favorites" as if they are objective about dorian, or "you obviously don't know what shows are judged on" Nasser is my favorite but I'm not afraid to say the ronster is better, I really don't like flex wheeler, but I'll admit his better than JP Fux. they are just too arrogant to admit whe they are wrong. if dorian is your favorite thats fine, I like dorians training vids, but saying he is the best is just ludicrous

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #64 on: July 19, 2010, 06:22:24 PM »

You are a gimmick no doubts and you are complaining

anyway here is Doria NOT at his best blowing Coleman out of the water in the back department at his best
even if I was a gimmick, so what. whose gimmick would I be?

it doesn't matter I'm still right about ronnie > dorian

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #65 on: July 19, 2010, 06:23:05 PM »
team dorian has to make a lot of claims and spit out opinions, but they can't do much in the way of pictures or hard evidence



now they will probably start the usual "you're a troll" "just because you don't like dorian" "guy"
but nothing really to prove me wrong
How many times have we told you, we did this whole fucking thing in the truce thread, were not rehashing it with you when there is 1700+ pages, it doesnt matter anyway, you look at Ronnie and you think hes better, it doesnt matter what we post. The fact that you are saying what youre saying IS trolling, you already know your not gonna change your mind so youre just trying to start an argument. Surely you cant be this dumb?

It doesnt matter what we post, you have already decided Ronnie wins and youll just say the same shit. I am personally tired of it, you cant educate someone in how contests are judged who already has there mind made up.  ::)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #66 on: July 19, 2010, 06:23:12 PM »
Dorian at his fucking worse

I turned up the brightness of these pics ONLY because they were to dark

saucetradomous

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3000
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #67 on: July 19, 2010, 06:26:12 PM »
yeah Ronnie's never seen a pic or video of his back  ::) everyone likes to make a lot of excuses for Ronnie a common theme whenever he concedes to Yates

It was a joke.. You take Ronnie's humbleness and try to turn it into your own proof.  There is no excuse... you two idiots find the best pics of both and put them together.. I'm sure you've done this a thousand times, It is quite obvious who's is better.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #68 on: July 19, 2010, 06:26:45 PM »
even if I was a gimmick, so what. whose gimmick would I be?

it doesn't matter I'm still right about ronnie > dorian

I don't care whose gimmick you are , time will prove me right

and you're still wrong about Ronnie , because Dorian beat Ronnie for years so Ronnie never ' > ' Dorian and never will  ;)

Dorian's back is harder , drier , thicker , more detailed and separated , point proven.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #69 on: July 19, 2010, 06:31:50 PM »
Dorian at his fucking worse

I turned up the brightness of these pics ONLY because they were to dark

yeah, he looks awful there. 50" waist, twig arms. wide back but damn ugly.

as always, ronnie has the mass with class:
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #70 on: July 19, 2010, 06:31:57 PM »
It was a joke.. You take Ronnie's humbleness and try to turn it into your own proof.  There is no excuse... you two idiots find the best pics of both and put them together.. I'm sure you've done this a thousand times, It is quite obvious who's is better.

humbleness? don't presume to speak for Ronnie or elaborate on what he was thinking. and it's quite obvious who is better to whom? you I think it's quite obvious Dorian is and in fact always was hence why he beat Ronnie everytime he faced him , granted he wasn't as good when he faced Yates but Dorian had all the tools to beat Ronnie

Ronnie at his absolute best Olympia appearance according to him in 98 could barely beat Flex a man Dorian crushed when he was much better in 93 and it's obvious who's better? I think not

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #71 on: July 19, 2010, 06:32:20 PM »

here you can see them both at their best, ronnie is thicker, more striated all around better

same thing, with much more detail

here the size and detail difference is more profound

tell me what makes dorian better in these photos "you've already made up your mind" is not an excuse, these pictures prove that objectively ronnie is better, the truce thread is also not reason that dorian is better. yall always want to ignore these photos.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #72 on: July 19, 2010, 06:33:10 PM »
Heres my take.
Ronnie is the epitome of full mass.
Dorian is the epitome of conditioned mass.
EVEN if you want to argue that Dorians biceps imbalance were equal to Ronnies quad/calve imbalance and lower arm/upper arm imbalance, we all know that Conditioned mass>Full mass. Period.
The only time I see Ronnie POSSIBLY winning is 2003, for the simple fact that Ronnie was SO large that it would come down to weather judges wanted conditioning or straight size.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #73 on: July 19, 2010, 06:34:46 PM »
yeah, he looks awful there. 50" waist, twig arms. wide back but damn ugly.

as always, ronnie has the mass with class:

Ah trying to change the topic of BACKS fail as usual Hulkster

Dorian's back at what the overwhelming majority of experts feel is his best showing PALE in comparison to Dorian who isn't even at his best

Dorian's back is thicker , drier , denser , more detailed and shows better separation you have your excuses and I have the proof

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #74 on: July 19, 2010, 06:39:01 PM »

here you can see them both at their best, ronnie is thicker, more striated all around better

same thing, with much more detail

here the size and detail difference is more profound

tell me what makes dorian better in these photos "you've already made up your mind" is not an excuse, these pictures prove that objectively ronnie is better, the truce thread is also not reason that dorian is better. yall always want to ignore these photos.

I've already explained to you those ' comparisons ' are NOT an accurate representation of reality , they are heavily skewed in Ronnie's favor , Dorian does NOT have smaller joints than Ronnie , yet in those pics he does , he does NOT have a smaller waist & hips , yet in those pics he does , he does NOT have smaller calves than Ronnie , yet in those pics he does , it's not reality and if you're basing your opinion on that you're just as fooling yourself

Dorian's density & dryness are utterly destroying Ronnie in that comparison , as is his balance & proportion , Ronnie is bigger and a lot softer and that's not an advantage