Author Topic: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??  (Read 30234 times)

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #200 on: July 20, 2010, 04:19:11 PM »
he is an idiot. and he is really taking a public beating in this thread much like the truce thread he ran from not too long ago.

its the same old story:

pics and visuals show ronnie is clearly better for reasons that have been explained and verified time and time again.


ND attempts to discredit visuals.

everyone knows the  visuals are real and as objective as you can get in this sport.

ND looks like an idiot.
And even Groink understands that visuals arent proof because its up to the PERSON looking at the visuals to forumlate his opinion.
Im MY opinion, all those pics you post just shows Dorian being better balanced, better conditioned, and just as large as Ronnie (Except 2003 where Ronnie traded size for conditioning)

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #201 on: July 20, 2010, 04:21:18 PM »
Proven how? how is it a proven fact Dorian doesn't have smaller joints , hips and waist compared to Ronnie? and bigger calves? are you asking how this is proven? shall I even dignify this with a meltdown reply? shall I continue? 

And I'm the one teaching YOU ( and these guys ) how bodybuilding contests are judged that's who I am  ;)


You are just strange...who the hell is talking about joint size and calves?? are you high or something?

It's like you don't understand English

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #202 on: July 20, 2010, 04:22:48 PM »

Quote
And even Groink understands that visuals arent proof because its up to the PERSON looking at the visuals to forumlate his opinion

but Groink isn't going on about how 1999 olympia videos are faked just because they show ronnie being significantly better than dorian ::).

you guys made this your mission statement for a year.

talk about admitting ronnie was better...thats about all you need from your camp right there..
Flower Boy Ran Away

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #203 on: July 20, 2010, 04:23:45 PM »
And even Groink understands that visuals arent proof because its up to the PERSON looking at the visuals to forumlate his opinion.
Im MY opinion, all those pics you post just shows Dorian being better balanced, better conditioned, and just as large as Ronnie (Except 2003 where Ronnie traded size for conditioning)

Fair enough....I seriously think ND is mentally imbalanced.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #204 on: July 20, 2010, 04:24:10 PM »
Quote
It's like you don't understand English

he never has. anyone who has spent any time debating with ND understands that he fails to read and understand basic english.

I don't think it is his first language. his grasp is much too weak for that.
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #205 on: July 20, 2010, 04:24:13 PM »
he is an idiot. and he is really taking a public beating in this thread much like the truce thread he ran from not too long ago.

its the same old story:

pics and visuals show ronnie is clearly better for reasons that have been explained and verified time and time again.


ND attempts to discredit visuals.

everyone knows the  visuals are real and as objective as you can get in this sport.

ND looks like an idiot.

Thank you for proving my points. you're bitter because I kicked your ass in the truce thread and are looking for ANYONE to agree with you so you can try and equal the score , it's not gonna happen dummy

I've owned you for years now , keep trying to beg anyone to agree that I'm wrong  ;)

when someone says Dorian should have lost the most dominating Mr Olympia win in the contests history he is an idiot , when someone says Ronnie dominated a contest where he lost the entire prejudging he is an idiot , when someone claimed 1998 was a close contest when the winner and second place guy was separated by 3 point he is an idiot , when someone says 1999 is Ronnie's best showing he's an idiot , I can honesty continue for a LONG time with your moron statements but everyone get's the gist  ;)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #206 on: July 20, 2010, 04:25:07 PM »
Fair enough....I seriously think ND is mentally imbalanced.

so does everyone else on this board.

its common knowledge by now..
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #207 on: July 20, 2010, 04:26:24 PM »

You are just strange...who the hell is talking about joint size and calves?? are you high or something?



too much flower perfume..
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #208 on: July 20, 2010, 04:27:11 PM »

You are just strange...who the hell is talking about joint size and calves?? are you high or something?

It's like you don't understand English

Having a tough time following the point? you asked a simple question and I'm proving my point , you said how it is proven a fact and not an opinion , I'm explaining my point about certain things are a proven fact and not an opinion , it's on you if you have comprehension issues.

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #209 on: July 20, 2010, 04:28:38 PM »
Thank you for proving my points. you're bitter because I kicked your ass in the truce thread and are looking for ANYONE to agree with you so you can try and equal the score , it's not gonna happen dummy

I've owned you for years now , keep trying to beg anyone to agree that I'm wrong  ;)

when someone says Dorian should have lost the most dominating Mr Olympia win in the contests history he is an idiot , when someone says Ronnie dominated a contest where he lost the entire prejudging he is an idiot , when someone claimed 1998 was a close contest when the winner and second place guy was separated by 3 point he is an idiot , when someone says 1999 is Ronnie's best showing he's an idiot , I can honesty continue for a LONG time with your moron statements but everyone get's the gist  ;)

No we don't actually....It's his opinion. No right or wrong about it.

You really seem to have a hard time grasping that very simple concept

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #210 on: July 20, 2010, 04:29:38 PM »
Fair enough....I seriously think ND is mentally imbalanced.

says the guy who calls a post which details and elaborates on my point of view why I think Dorian is better than Ronnie a ' meltdown '

more wonderful logic from you  ::)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #211 on: July 20, 2010, 04:31:04 PM »
so does everyone else on this board.

its common knowledge by now..

Typical Hulkster can't compete in the debate subject and now tries at all costs to attack the messenger lol I love when you prove me right.


Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #212 on: July 20, 2010, 04:34:13 PM »
says the guy who calls a post which details and elaborates on my point of view why I think Dorian is better than Ronnie a ' meltdown '

more wonderful logic from you  ::)

To compare these two dudes down to their fingernails in an attempt to prove yourself right is a textbook meltdown.

You can post a billion words, it's still just some douche on the net's opinion

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #213 on: July 20, 2010, 04:34:18 PM »
No we don't actually....It's his opinion. No right or wrong about it.

You really seem to have a hard time grasping that very simple concept

No you're wrong period. he's entitled to his own opinion ut he's not entitled to his own facts. especially when his ' opinion ' contradicts the facts.

it's you who apparently have a very difficult time following simple concepts

he says Dorian lost the most dominant Mr Olympia contest , he's not wrong?  ::)

he claims Ronnie dominated a contest where he lost the entire prejudging and he's not wrong?  ::)

nonsense plain & simple , there are facts and then there are morons who contradict them and hiding under the umbrella of opinion doesn't make the facts wrong

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #214 on: July 20, 2010, 04:37:46 PM »
Quote
You can post a billion words, it's still just some douche on the net's opinion

and its an opinion based on things not found in real life..

thats why he must try and disprove and discredit all the visuals.

the visuals show ronnie to be much better when you apply the basic criteria of physique assessment.

ND knows this so his answer is to ignore/discredit the visuals - see the 1999 Olympia pics, vids and screenshots for the most famous example of this.

sneaky tactic, but one that everyone has seen right through long ago..
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #215 on: July 20, 2010, 04:38:01 PM »
To compare these two dudes down to their fingernails in an attempt to prove yourself right is a textbook meltdown.

You can post a billion words, it's still just some douche on the net's opinion

Still lost huh? my intent wasn't to prove myself right , that's impossible because these guys already made up their minds , my intent was to show them how to pose and argument based on the judging criteria which none of you can seem to do , once again it's a case of you drawing your own conclusions

and all the name calling sensitive are we?

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #216 on: July 20, 2010, 04:40:20 PM »
No you're wrong period. he's entitled to his own opinion ut he's not entitled to his own facts. especially when his ' opinion ' contradicts the facts.

it's you who apparently have a very difficult time following simple concepts

he says Dorian lost the most dominant Mr Olympia contest , he's not wrong?  ::)

he claims Ronnie dominated a contest where he lost the entire prejudging and he's not wrong?  ::)

nonsense plain & simple , there are facts and then there are morons who contradict them and hiding under the umbrella of opinion doesn't make the facts wrong

I really don't follow the minutiae of what you two have been bickering about for the last five years.

I do know the crux of the argument is he thinks Ronnie is better, you think Dorian is better. two differing opinions.

Neither one of you is right or wrong, but you seem to think your opinion carries more weight. it's funny.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #217 on: July 20, 2010, 04:40:36 PM »
a billion words in an ND rant on getbig cannot overcome the evidence in this video:



sorry nuthuggers. but your hero could not come close to this.
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #218 on: July 20, 2010, 04:40:46 PM »
and its an opinion based on things not found in real life..

thats why he must try and disprove and discredit all the visuals.

the visuals show ronnie to be much better when you apply the basic criteria of physique assessment.

ND knows this so his answer is to ignore/discredit the visuals - see the 1999 Olympia pics, vids and screenshots for the most famous example of this.

sneaky tactic, but one that everyone has seen right through long ago..

I love when Hulkster says ' real life ' with his manipulated screencaps and his conclusions that defy reason and logic , Ronnie's calves are way more detailed than Dorians are LMFAO

I can continue to showcase your hypocrisy and stupidity but I'll let you get back to begging for people to agree with you , you need it.  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #219 on: July 20, 2010, 04:44:14 PM »
I really don't follow the minutiae of what you two have been bickering about for the last five years.

I do know the crux of the argument is he thinks Ronnie is better, you think Dorian is better. two differing opinions.

Neither one of you is right or wrong, but you seem to think your opinion carries more weight. it's funny.

I'll tell you what the argument has become , Hulkster made to look like a giant moron and him bashing Yates and trying to slander me in every post , it's all he does he very rarely posts in other topics and it's all he knows.

I made him look like a complete idiot and now he's begging everyone on here to agree with him and that will some how prove his point Dorian should have lost in 1993  ::)

I embarrassed the living fuck out of Hulkster by showing everyone how ignorant , stupid and retarded he is and now he's desperately trying to equal the score , and to add insult to injury I rubbed it in his face that Ronnie's said even after he became Mr Olympia he couldn't touch Dorian so what he have now is a bitter little man who can't let go , now his entire time on GetBig is dedicated to bashing Yates and me it's all he has

I let this shit go a long time ago , he can't.


Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #220 on: July 20, 2010, 04:44:25 PM »
Still lost huh? my intent wasn't to prove myself right , that's impossible because these guys already made up their minds , my intent was to show them how to pose and argument based on the judging criteria which none of you can seem to do , once again it's a case of you drawing your own conclusions

and all the name calling sensitive are we?

You think that was an insult...but I'm sensitive. LOLOLOL .

I'm just talking here, no need to get all jumpy because you don't agree with what I say

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #221 on: July 20, 2010, 04:46:10 PM »
You think that was an insult...but I'm sensitive. LOLOLOL .

I'm just talking here, no need to get all jumpy because you don't agree with what I say

no insult , I don't need to insult you.

you're the one name calling

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #222 on: July 20, 2010, 04:48:02 PM »
no insult , I don't need to insult you.

you're the one name calling

I said "some douche on the net"  not really an insult in my book, just a term. I say it about myself.

I'm done here....debating you is like debating a republican, it's pointless

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #223 on: July 20, 2010, 04:48:48 PM »
a billion words in an ND rant on getbig cannot overcome the evidence in this video:



sorry nuthuggers. but your hero could not come close to this.

hahahahahaha the old ' see ' Dorian was eons better years before  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #224 on: July 20, 2010, 04:50:11 PM »
I said "some douche on the net"  not really an insult in my book, just a term. I say it about myself.

I'm done here....debating you is like debating a republican, it's pointless

there is NO debate , you'd have to know what you're talking about. there is just sensitive fan-boys angry because Ronnie wasn't good enough to beat Dorian