« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11   Go Down

Author Topic: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??  (Read 30240 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #225 on: July 20, 2010, 05:02:37 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 20, 2010, 04:48:48 PM
hahahahahaha the old ' see ' Dorian was eons better years before  ;)

I hope you realize that every time you try and laugh at the 'see' argument (which is the most effective argument of them all because it uses real visuals not verbal bullshit)

the whole board laughs at you.

nothing wrong with using real visuals to show ronnie was better.

in fact, its the most damaging evidence ever to your position.

and you know it.



Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #226 on: July 20, 2010, 05:06:34 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on July 20, 2010, 05:02:37 PM
I hope you realize that every time you try and laugh at the 'see' argument (which is the most effective argument of them all because it uses real visuals not verbal bullshit)

the whole board laughs at you.

nothing wrong with using real visuals to show ronnie was better.

in fact, its the most damaging evidence ever to your position.

and you know it.

OH NO the ' board ' is laughing at me , says the guy who claims Ronnie has more detailed calves that Dorian ever did and Dorian should have lost to Flex in 93 LMFAO who cares what the ' board ' thinks , stop begging for people to agree with you it wont change how retarded you are

yeah and the 99 screencaps that were PHOTOSHOPPED were overwhelming visual evidence too  ;D until Kevin Horton busted you oh lets not forget your morphed pics you used  ;D and your fake quotes  ;D

Ronnie knows Dorian is better only his fanboys don't

Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #227 on: July 20, 2010, 05:07:37 PM »
compare the videos.

ronnie crushes him. 10x better taper, better muscle shape. better back, arms, quads, chest, hams, glutes etc.

dorian has better calves and abs.

same old story.

and ND, there is nothing you can do to disprove these visuals.

as much as you hate them, they are real.

sucks to be you.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #228 on: July 20, 2010, 05:10:04 PM »
Visuals back up my point of view as well as Ronnie when he said Dorian had the thickest freakiest back he ever seen and unlike you internet-fan-boy Ronnie's seen Dorian LIVE and in PERSON not just on pictures and video  ;)
Logged

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16161
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #229 on: July 20, 2010, 05:11:30 PM »
Dorian wins on back, calves and abs; Ronnie wins on chest, arms and thighs.

Tough one ;D
Logged

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #230 on: July 20, 2010, 05:12:09 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 20, 2010, 05:10:04 PM
Visuals back up my point of view as well as Ronnie when he said Dorian had the thickest freakiest back he ever seen and unlike you internet-fan-boy Ronnie's seen Dorian LIVE and in PERSON not just on pictures and video  ;)

you left out this picture...best back ever seen
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #231 on: July 20, 2010, 05:12:11 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on July 20, 2010, 05:07:37 PM
compare the videos.

ronnie crushes him. 10x better taper, better muscle shape. better back, arms, quads, chest, hams, glutes etc.

dorian has better calves and abs.

same old story.

and ND, there is nothing you can do to disprove these visuals.

as much as you hate them, they are real.

sucks to be you.

Yup so you say and you say a LOT of things that contradict REALITY like Ronnie had more detailed calves than Dorian  ;) and Dorian should have lost the 93 Olympia to Flex  ;D and 99 is Ronnie's best  ??? Ronnie dominated a contest he lost the whole prejudging in  :-\ keep talking kid it's all you have

Logged

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16161
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #232 on: July 20, 2010, 05:13:07 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on July 20, 2010, 05:07:37 PM
and ND, there is nothing you can do to disprove these visuals.

Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #233 on: July 20, 2010, 05:13:45 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 20, 2010, 05:10:04 PM
Visuals back up my point of view as well as Ronnie when he said Dorian had the thickest freakiest back he ever seen and unlike you internet-fan-boy Ronnie's seen Dorian LIVE and in PERSON not just on pictures and video  ;)

yeah, lots of people have seen both ronnie and dorian live and in person.


including getbiggers.
and do you know what they say?

read and weep loser:


http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=252142.0

Quote
Dorian is not in the league of Ronnie.
Best Ronnie was from the outer space.
No competition.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #234 on: July 20, 2010, 05:13:47 PM »
Quote from: Groink on July 20, 2010, 05:12:09 PM
you left out this picture...best back ever seen

it's 98 looked fantastic that year . The pic I posted crushes that one by far and this is ONLY my opinion  ;) the he looked fantastic that year is a fact in fact much better than 1999
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #235 on: July 20, 2010, 05:16:21 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on July 20, 2010, 05:13:45 PM
yeah, lots of people have seen both ronnie and dorian live and in person.


including getbiggers.
and do you know what they say?

read and weep loser:


http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=252142.0


You think that trumps the THREE times Ronnie said he couldn't touch Yates? and quotes are useless and look at poor Huulkster trying to use them hypocrite

Ronnie trumps everyone else opinion on the subject , this ended the truce thread and sent you into a downward spiral that you still haven't recovered from  ;D

Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #236 on: July 20, 2010, 05:16:59 PM »
I think its really sad that you guys are clinging to the 96 post tear (LOL are you high? ::)) grand prix vid of dorian as your saviour.

sure, his back is very cut and detailed.

but its also quite thin in the rear double bi pose - at least compared to ronnie..

his waist is massive, his arms are awful, his quads even worse. pecs nothing special as always.

shitty from the front. great from the back.

same old story.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #237 on: July 20, 2010, 05:17:24 PM »
Quote from: affeman on July 20, 2010, 05:13:07 PM


Ouch lol poor Hulkster and this isn't even Dorian's best , scary proposition
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #238 on: July 20, 2010, 05:20:26 PM »
that vid is great. great for the ronnie side.

dorian's torn up shitty arms are 5 sizes too small for his massive gut and torso.

its great that the vid intro shows dorian's awful proportions freeze framed in all is shitty glory..

but then, that is not something that the nuthuggers have ever understood anything about..proportions.. ::)
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16161
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #239 on: July 20, 2010, 05:23:48 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 20, 2010, 05:17:24 PM
Ouch lol poor Hulkster and this isn't even Dorian's best , scary proposition

Honestly that's the best video of Dorian I've seen on the net. He's so freaky thick and full there, he makes 99 Coleman look flat like a pancake. It makes you wonder how a human can even walk around carrying so much thickness on his frame lol.
Logged

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #240 on: July 20, 2010, 05:24:58 PM »
Hahah way to go Affeman, brutal ownage of Hulkster, he wont recover, once again Dorians clear superiority is burned into Hulkster brain and hell spend the next 6 months going into any thread with Dorians name on it trying desperatley to get people to agree with him,... hahaha oh brother massive ownage by a far from his best Dorian, let alone 93, bwahahaha.  ;D

Dorian's thickness and harndess = unmatched.
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #241 on: July 20, 2010, 05:25:38 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on July 20, 2010, 05:20:26 PM
that vid is great. great for the ronnie side.

dorian's torn up shitty arms are 5 sizes too small for his massive gut and torso.

its great that the vid intro shows dorian's awful proportions freeze framed in all is shitty glory..

but then, that is not something that the nuthuggers have ever understood anything about..proportions.. ::)

hehehehehehehe Ronnie's shiity 15 sizes to small calves are totally acceptable ,and his massive gut is as well and his shitty proportions are , hey lets overlook all of Ronnie's flaws hahahahaha

hypocrite
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #242 on: July 20, 2010, 05:27:20 PM »
Quote from: affeman on July 20, 2010, 05:23:48 PM
Honestly that's the best video of Dorian I've seen on the net. He's so freaky thick and full there, he makes 99 Coleman look flat like a pancake. It makes you wonder how a human can even walk around carrying so much thickness on his frame lol.

He knows it's great why he tries so hard to act like it's not that video shows Dorian in amazing conditioning especially compared to 99
Logged

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #243 on: July 20, 2010, 05:28:13 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on July 20, 2010, 05:20:26 PM
that vid is great. great for the ronnie side.

dorian's torn up shitty arms are 5 sizes too small for his massive gut and torso.

its great that the vid intro shows dorian's awful proportions freeze framed in all is shitty glory..

but then, that is not something that the nuthuggers have ever understood anything about..proportions.. ::)
Hahaha keep telling yourself whatever you need, hte only person youre trying to convince is yourself, we already know who was better, hahah Ronnie could never touch Dorian, let alone beat him, and history proves me right, hahaha  ;D
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83517
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #244 on: July 20, 2010, 05:34:12 PM »
Quote from: Shockwave on July 20, 2010, 05:28:13 PM
Hahaha keep telling yourself whatever you need, hte only person youre trying to convince is yourself, we already know who was better, hahah Ronnie could never touch Dorian, let alone beat him, and history proves me right, hahaha  ;D

he's desperately trying to appeals to everyone and anyone who will agree with him , " Look everyone the two nutt-huggers claim Dorian is better ' it's pathetic he tries so hard to speak for the entire board and the whole bodybuilding industry the kid is a complete tool , even people who think Ronnie is better think Hulkster is retarded  ;D and they're right

Logged

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #245 on: July 20, 2010, 08:34:09 PM »
Ok I changed my mind, dorian is better. ND, Shockwave, you guys win. I've realized that ronnie just lacks the size and detail and condition and balance that dorian had.
















































































































































































JK BOOM! bahahahaha
Logged

James Blunt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3272
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #246 on: July 20, 2010, 09:51:26 PM »
Every body part on Ronnie is gigantic. His back appearing large still is ridiculous. These queefs today aren't even close.

LOL the photo above ^ you can see Ronnies ''glutes'' from the front.
Logged

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #247 on: July 21, 2010, 07:53:46 AM »
Quote from: James Blunt on July 20, 2010, 09:51:26 PM
Every body part on Ronnie is gigantic. His back appearing large still is ridiculous. These queefs today aren't even close.

LOL the photo above ^ you can see Ronnies ''glutes'' from the front.
quarter turn facing back,     rear glute spread
Logged

mahg

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 597
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #248 on: July 21, 2010, 01:27:42 PM »
Grown allegedly heterosexual men comparing pictures of other men in thongs..  :-*
Logged

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Is Colemans back still special by todays standards??
« Reply #249 on: July 21, 2010, 01:41:06 PM »
Quote from: mahg on July 21, 2010, 01:27:42 PM
Grown allegedly heterosexual men comparing pictures of other men in thongs..  :-*
what the fuck do you think bodybuilding is?

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11   Go Up
« previous next »