Here we go again:
Have you published any papers on the subject? Have you written any books on the subject? Your use of the tired old label "CTer" shows your mindest and proclivities.
Ad Hoc and
assumption lol So because i haven't written and published any papers and have not written books on the subject i am not informed on the events of 9/11, the evidence, and the many different arguments for and against a CT?
I am starting to see why based on how you try to discredit me in this instance, why you are a CT'er. Makes total sense.
It's easy to jump on the interent and do "research". You can find just about any information on a variety of subjects to prove or disprove your point. One simple question for you......is it so hard to wrap your mind around the possibility that even if 9/11 happened exactly how you think it happened that the US government or entities within the US government allowed it to happen or even worse were complicit in it?
More
Assumption. I've said many times especially on this forum that i do NOT believe the "official 9/11 report" is 100% correct. that's more than obvious it's not exact.
I mean would that be such a huge shock to your view of the world?
Here we go more
assumption and this "
assumption" seems to be the crux of your point. And now you are using the whole "sheep" card. lol
That's the
biggest issue I have with people like you. You see the world the way you want to see it. If you knew anything about history and some of the shit I mentioned which people like you chaulk up to "conspiracy theory" you'd realize that US government complicity in the events of 9/11 or at best turning a blind eye with full transparency that it was going to happen and not stopping it.......is a very real possiblity and most likely what happened.
The funny part here is that your whole
issue with me is based on a false
assumption. Do you feel angry about it?
And the events of 9/11 were used as a launch point for a huge increase in government bureaucracy, the Patriot Act,and never ending wars on terrorism.
So there's no possibility and likelihood that the increase in government bureaucracy and the Patriot Act were made possible because events like 9/11 helped the proponents push the funding/votes through? And that one of these wars is being fought in a limited PC, ROE style, in a country who has never been conquered successfully by a modern army? (of course, not right? People like me don't know history)
I will say this, you are a consistent assumer. You should be proud of that. Consistency is usually the difference between occasional winners and true champions. You are well on your way to being a champion assumer. Props to you. I mean that.