so if you guys are correct you should not listen to the scientists who write the studies i post because the guy who posts them is fat
the reason i am fat is because i ate too much and exercised too little ( none at all actually for 2 years) - not because i am stupid or don't know how to build muscle or diet.
the world is full of smart fat guys, and full of fat guys who once looked great.
do i need to post pics of me thin ? what would that prove ?
my posts speak for themselves - i post interesting thought provoking studies relevant to bodybuilding, strength, nutrition and general health.
if you don't want to read them don't.
if you don't agree with them debate me.
josh is obviously feeling the strain after only 2 weeks. His bland diet is already depressing him, and he has already fell off the wagon a few times. while I've been happy eating good tasty food while studying and working hard in between workouts and cardie almost every day
regarding the studies:
studies show that once protein requirements are met - fat loss is simply a result of reducing calories from the energy macros i.e. fats and carbs or burning more calories via exercise - this is all i have ever said and it is 100% correct.
if you guys are happy dieting on bland chicken breast and baked potatoes good for you, I'd rather have cajun chicken and fries
in the end calories are all that matter.
and every week you can see the proof in my training log.
and for those of you interested in science of building muscle, strength etc you can also read the abstracts of very good ground breaking studies that i have used to develop my beliefs on training and diet. these will be updated and added too as and when i see fit/ get some free time to post them.
i must be doing something right, I'm stronger than josh by far, fitter too and in a few months i will look shit hot and ripped as well
if not I'll delete my account and move on.
you all have my word.
