Author Topic: "bodybuilding nutrition"  (Read 30471 times)

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #100 on: September 25, 2010, 05:14:27 AM »
lift weights

your genetics will determine the rest

you will have a good idea of your genetics and potential within 6 weeks of working out

if that were true and bodybuilding was purely a matter of genetics then humans would have died out long ago.
175lbs by 31st July

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #101 on: September 25, 2010, 07:03:18 AM »
Why is it so hard to distinguish between the goal of optimal body composition and the goal of optimal health? This is a bodybuilding board and this thread is named "bodybuidling nutrition". In any case, there is just as much bro science in the field of optimal health (if not even more) than in the field of bodybuilding.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #102 on: September 25, 2010, 07:05:39 AM »
Why is it so hard to distinguish between the goal of optimal body composition and the goal of optimal health? This is a bodybuilding board and this thread is named "bodybuidling nutrition". In any case, there is just as much bro science in the field of optimal health (if not even more) than in the field of bodybuilding.

Optimal body composition in bodybuilding is NOT 60kg 10% bodyfat.
You could compete in a Japanese women's BB contest with your body and weight, and you would lose.

Sorry.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #103 on: September 25, 2010, 07:09:49 AM »
Optimal body composition in bodybuilding is NOT 60kg 10% bodyfat.
You could compete in a Japanese women's BB contest with your body and weight, and you would lose.

Sorry.

I think I already mentioned that arguments ad hominem (even if they would be correct) are irrelevant to the topic at hand.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #104 on: September 25, 2010, 07:13:09 AM »
I think I already mentioned that arguments ad hominem (even if they would be correct) are irrelevant to the topic at hand.

FU, WL.

YOU are irrelevant for bodybuilding, you little austrian twink.

How's that for body composition?



































 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #105 on: September 25, 2010, 07:21:21 AM »
FU, WL.

YOU are irrelevant for bodybuilding, you little austrian twink.

How's that for body composition?

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Of course I'm irrelevant to it, I'm just a skinny geek with too much time on my hands.
Since I have no education in nutrition science whatsoever, I use the same method as literally all nutrition "experts", "gurus", and supplement companies:

Throw shit on the wall and see what sticks.












However, I do have a GF with a master in nutrition science. ;D

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #106 on: September 25, 2010, 07:23:04 AM »

However, I do have a GF with a master in nutrition science. ;D


Then why don't you listen to her for a change? ;D ;D


On a side note: Pics or it didn't happen.

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16149
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #107 on: September 25, 2010, 07:23:30 AM »
However, I do have a GF with a master in nutrition science. ;D


Sasha Wallecek?

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #108 on: September 25, 2010, 07:26:12 AM »
Then why don't you listen to her for a change? ;D ;D

She listens to me. ;D

On a side note: Pics or it didn't happen.

Coming from you that's kind of ironic. ;D

Sasha Wallecek?

Too old and she doesnt have a master degree. ;D

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #109 on: September 25, 2010, 07:28:04 AM »


Coming from you that's kind of ironic. ;D



Are you saying i don't even exist??

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #110 on: September 25, 2010, 07:33:49 AM »
Are you saying i don't even exist??

who knows, you could be one of my gimmicks ;D

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #111 on: September 25, 2010, 07:47:38 AM »
who knows, you could be one of my gimmicks ;D

I'm too proud to be anyone's gimmick.  ;D ;D

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #112 on: September 25, 2010, 12:42:25 PM »


Coming from you that's kind of ironic. ;D



hahahaha owned.
175lbs by 31st July

JP_RC

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #113 on: September 25, 2010, 01:18:26 PM »
Plus calories on fries and Mc Chicken are much higher, so this means that in return you get much less protein or carbs

x2  If only the "calorie is a calorie" group could understand this.

JP_RC

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #114 on: September 25, 2010, 01:19:21 PM »
If you're on a restricted calorie diet it makes a lot of sense to go for lower calorie dense foods like chicken and potatoes, so one can get much more nutrition (carbs and protein) from the controlled calories. I definitively agree with eating high calorie dense foods like pizza or anything when growth is the main goal (easier to get in high amounts of calories), but on a diet its different.

And its not because chicken breast and rice are magic foods that get you lean and its not because burgers and fries make you fat, its just beacause as Donkey said: you'll get more nutrients out of the controlled calories.

ManBearPig...

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12280
  • Professional Fighter
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #115 on: September 25, 2010, 01:57:01 PM »
wavelength = 125 lbs at 5'11"
fatpanda = 417 lbs at 5'11"

what do they have in common?  both claim to be on the same diet.
Deep Tissue Massage

newmom

  • Guest
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #116 on: September 25, 2010, 02:09:40 PM »

what do they have in common?  both claim to be on the same diet.

nothing, one is bulemic??

mass 04

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11039
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #117 on: September 25, 2010, 02:10:28 PM »
hahahaha owned.
screw you, sugar tits.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #118 on: September 26, 2010, 01:59:49 AM »
wavelength = 125 lbs at 5'11"
fatpanda = 417 lbs at 5'11"

what do they have in common?  both claim to be on the same diet.

Sounds like a success story...  ::) ::)



wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #119 on: September 27, 2010, 03:06:24 AM »
If you're on a restricted calorie diet it makes a lot of sense to go for lower calorie dense foods like chicken and potatoes, so one can get much more nutrition (carbs and protein) from the controlled calories. I definitively agree with eating high calorie dense foods like pizza or anything when growth is the main goal (easier to get in high amounts of calories), but on a diet its different.

And its not because chicken breast and rice are magic foods that get you lean and its not because burgers and fries make you fat, its just beacause as Donkey said: you'll get more nutrients out of the controlled calories.

I agree, it's a convenience factor. For many people, less dense foods will make their diet easier to maintain. However, for other people a more moderate approach or even a diet with predominantly dense food is more convenient. The point is that for body composition it doesn't matter and therefore can be used as a tool of convenience.

As far as nutrients go, you just have to get the minimal required values for survival and optimal body composition. IMO, you can easily get that just as well from dense foods (maybe supplemented by a protein shake and some fruits and veggies).

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #120 on: September 27, 2010, 04:10:24 AM »
Sounds like a success story...  ::) ::)



pathetic and embarassing at the same time.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #121 on: September 27, 2010, 03:32:00 PM »
Don't feel bad guys (and girl), I too was once a masochist.

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #122 on: September 27, 2010, 03:48:53 PM »
wave what height are you ?
175lbs by 31st July

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #123 on: September 27, 2010, 03:50:04 PM »

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71218
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: "bodybuilding nutrition"
« Reply #124 on: September 27, 2010, 03:51:06 PM »
Chicken breast
salad
water
repeat

Sorry Wave!! ;D