Author Topic: The worst attorney general in American History  (Read 41571 times)

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #100 on: June 16, 2012, 11:07:18 PM »
Sorry Bro... Alberto Gonzalez, John Mitchell, and A. Mitchell Palmer were ALL worse.

Holder is a top 5 easily though.

agreed

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • TND
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #101 on: June 17, 2012, 03:02:22 PM »
Tu

You're smarter than braindead baboons like SAMSON, andre et. al

Alberto Gonzalez suspended habeas corpus and set up secret prisons?  ::)

C'mon brotha. I expect more from you.

Whether you consider Holder the worst of all time is matter of personal taste. I'm 28 years old and he is by far the worst in my lifetime.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #102 on: June 18, 2012, 10:23:40 AM »
Border Patrol group calls for Holder’s resignation
 The Washington Times ^ | June 18, 2012 | Jerry Seper

Posted on Monday, June 18, 2012 12:17:33 PM by jazusamo

The National Border Patrol Council, which represents all 17,000 of the agency's nonsupervisory agents, called Monday for the resignation of Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. for his role in the botched "Fast and Furious" gunrunning operation that resulted in the death of a U.S. Border Patrol agent.

Council President George E. McCubbin III, a 25-year Border Patrol veteran, described Mr. Holder's actions in the case as "a slap in the face to all Border Patrol agents who serve this country," adding that the attorney general showed "an utter failure of leadership at the highest levels of government."

Two semi-automatic AK-47 assault weapons found at the scene of the Dec. 15, 2010, killing of Border Patrol Agent Brian A. Terry were traced by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to "straw buyers" who bought the weapons as part of the Fast and Furious investigation.

The agent died during a gunfight with heavily-armed Mexican bandits along the U.S.-Mexico border south of Tucson, Ariz.

More than 2,000 weapons purchased during the ATF-led Fast and Furious operation were "walked" to drug smugglers in Mexico. More than 600 of them still are missing.

Mr. McCubbin said Border Patrol agents are indoctrinated from day one of their training that "integrity is their most important trait and that without it, they have little use to the agency." He said agents who lie or show a lack of candor are disciplined quickly.

"The standard that applies to these agents should at a minimum be applied to those who lead them," Mr. McCubbin said. "If Eric Holder were a Border Patrol agent and not the attorney general, he would have long ago been found unsuitable for government employment and terminated."


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #103 on: June 18, 2012, 10:33:27 AM »
Tu

You're smarter than braindead baboons like SAMSON, andre et. al

Alberto Gonzalez suspended habeas corpus and set up secret prisons?  ::)

C'mon brotha. I expect more from you.

Whether you consider Holder the worst of all time is matter of personal taste. I'm 28 years old and he is by far the worst in my lifetime.

He did... Does the name Jose Padilla mean anything to you?

He absolutely did those things.

Holder isn't much better... Not at all.

But again, to say that Holder is worse than Gonzalez, in my mind, is not true... and he certainly isn't worse than the OTHERS i mentioned.

Seriously... everyone is enjoying skipping over the other AGs I mentioned specifically?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #104 on: June 18, 2012, 10:40:13 AM »
He did... Does the name Jose Padilla mean anything to you?

He absolutely did those things.

Holder isn't much better... Not at all.

But again, to say that Holder is worse than Gonzalez, in my mind, is not true... and he certainly isn't worse than the OTHERS i mentioned.

Seriously... everyone is enjoying skipping over the other AGs I mentioned specifically?


Holder gave Obama the legal permission to kill an american citizen and do the NDAA remember? 

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #105 on: June 18, 2012, 11:38:22 AM »
Holder gave Obama the legal permission to kill an american citizen and do the NDAA remember? 

Yes and I hate him it, the truth is that all of that sort of shit was started under Gonzalez and has been carried over... So yes... Holder is a piece of crap, but slightly less so than Gonzalez in my mind.

Again... There have been a shit ton of craptastic AGs.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #106 on: June 18, 2012, 02:30:19 PM »
John Fund: Will Holder’s Politicking Finally End?
National Review Online ^ | June 18, 2012 | John Fund





The Washington Post just bestowed its “Worst Week in Washington” award on Attorney General Eric Holder, and it’s not hard to see why.

Over the weekend, Senator Joe Lieberman, who caucuses with the Democrats, clearly expressed his lack of confidence in Holder by calling for a special counsel who is independent of the Justice Department to investigate serious leaks of national-security documents. Someone near the president is leaking classified information, and both Democrats and Republicans seem determined to find out who.

But the real blow came last week, when Holder’s carefully constructed stone walls against House investigators started to crumble.

Representative Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, announced he would initiate contempt-of-Congress proceedings against Holder for not turning over documents related to the committee’s probe of the Fast and Furious gunwalking scandal at Justice. Issa says that more 200 Mexicans and a U.S. Border Patrol agent were murdered with weapons that the U.S. government allowed to be sold to Mexican drug cartels as part of a probe into gun smuggling.

“The Justice Department is out of excuses,” House Speaker John Boehner said in support of Issa’s move. “Either the Justice Department turns over the information requested, or Congress will have no choice but to move forward with holding the attorney general in contempt for obstructing an ongoing investigation.”

The Justice Department dismissed Issa’s complaints, saying he was “playing political games.” By Friday, though, Holder said he was willing to sit down and negotiate to avoid what he dramatically called “a constitutional crisis.” For his part, Issa said he was willing to delay the contempt vote set for this Wednesday if Justice turns over a large chunk of the documents he has requested. But Issa says he will not back down until he gets to the bottom of Fast and Furious.

Holder’s sudden flexibility after 15 months of evasive maneuvers has two origins. First, sources inside Justice gave Issa a valuable leak last week: six wiretap applications used as part of Fast and Furious. Together, they provide evidence that higher-ups at Justice knew about and approved Fast and Furious, contrary to Holder’s assurances.

During an interview with me in New York last week, Issa pointed out that 31 House Democrats wrote a letter to Holder last year asking for more documents on Fast and Furious. The new revelations have shaken many of those Democrats, and Issa believes, based on a whip count, that many Democrats would ultimately back a contempt-of-Congress motion against Holder. This turnabout by Democrats is the second reason Holder is now promising cooperation. Until now, Holder wanted to wait for Justice’s inspector general to complete his own look at Fast and Furious before turning over more documents to Congress. But that investigation has been under way for 15 months, and there are no signs it will wrap up soon.

Issa’s patience is exhausted. “This is like Iran-contra, like Watergate, and other embarrassments over the years,” he told me. “The major embarrassment is the delay in being honest and open about it.”

The pattern of delay and denial is a familiar one, Issa says. “If you translate the double talk we get [from Justice], it amounts to ‘We will tell you what you need to know to know that we are right,’” he says. “What is the definition of propaganda?”

Attorney General Holder clearly helps President Obama in several ways. His brazen stonewalling of investigations certainly helps Obama postpone any final revelations until after the November elections. His department’s blatant refusal to enforce federal law requiring states to clean up their inaccurate voter-registration records, combined with DOJ lawsuits against state voter-ID laws, must bring smiles to any ACORN-like groups contemplating electoral mischief this fall. Finally, his attempt to contain and effectively delay any probe of the national-security leaks may outrage members of the intelligence community, but the perpetrators of those leaks surely must welcome Holder’s tactics.

With this record, Eric Holder has become, to paraphrase Gilbert and Sullivan, the very model of a modern attorney general — thoroughly political. It’s just too bad that such no-holds-barred partisanship has so little to do with real duties of the attorney general: upholding the rule of law, the Constitution, and standards of conduct other attorneys in government are expected to adhere to.

— John Fund is national-affairs columnist for NRO.

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #107 on: June 18, 2012, 08:38:34 PM »
Yes. But he didn't set the precedent.

Gonzales did that.

Also. I mentioned 3 other worse AGs in the history of the US and you ignored them completely.

Why?

because they're not black

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #108 on: June 18, 2012, 08:46:47 PM »
because they're not black

What does skin color have to do with the fact that Holder has Brian Terry's blood on his hands?

Figures that a racist scumbag couldn't care less about a dead cracker. JUSTICE FOR TRAYVON!!!!! ::) ::) ::)

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #109 on: June 18, 2012, 08:48:51 PM »
What does skin color have to do with the fact that Holder has Brian Terry's blood on his hands?

Figures that a racist scumbag couldn't care less about a dead cracker. JUSTICE FOR TRAYVON!!!!! ::) ::) ::)

you are amazing.....try taking 3333's balls out of your mouth.........It has nothing to do with race per se, but with 3333 EVERYTHING is race......and you know that

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #110 on: June 19, 2012, 03:15:23 AM »
you are amazing.....try taking 3333's balls out of your mouth.........It has nothing to do with race per se, but with 3333 EVERYTHING is race......and you know that

STFU.   You are the most raise poster on this board.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #111 on: June 19, 2012, 05:53:26 AM »
McGurn: Eric Holder's Politics of Contempt

The attorney general has it coming, but the answer isn't a special prosecutor.

By WILLIAM MCGURN



Finally, Eric Holder is on the ropes. House members are readying to vote him in contempt of Congress. Senators wonder aloud whether he can be trusted to investigate White House leaks that have exposed inside information about some of our most successful antiterror operations to some of our most dangerous enemies.

Alas, the old bulls of the Senate—including Republicans John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Chuck Grassley, along with Independent Democrat Joe Lieberman—are calling for the one thing that might derail the accountability train: a special prosecutor.


Columnist Bill McGurn on Attorney General Eric Holder's role in the White House. Photo: Getty Images
.
.
It all makes for the perfect tea party moment, an opportunity to make one of the most attractive arguments from the 2010 revolution: that process is as important as outcome, and that the Constitution gives us all the process we need to hold our leaders accountable.

The most immediate constitutional mechanism for accountability happens to be the one Mr. Holder is trying to put off—a vote by the House to hold him in contempt for refusing to turn over documents relating to "Fast and Furious." That was a stupid policy that had tragic results when a weapon smuggled into Mexico by U.S. authorities ended up being used to kill a U.S. Border Patrol agent.

Should the House hold him in contempt, Mr. Holder would be left with three choices: standing by as a U.S. attorney begins prosecuting him; directing the U.S. attorney not to prosecute him; or invoking executive privilege to justify not releasing the documents Congress seeks.
 
There are huge downsides to all three. Let's take them one by one.


A sitting attorney general under federal prosecution would be fatally weakened, with his continuing presence in the job a fat target for the president's political opponents. On the other hand, ordering a U.S. attorney not to prosecute him suggests a massive conflict-of-interest, not to mention conveying that he has something to hide. Ditto for "executive privilege." Not only does executive privilege have a tainted history, it couldn't be invoked without admitting that the White House is also implicated in Fast and Furious.
 
In no scenario are we likely to have the satisfaction of a definitive conclusion. Then again, the Framers of the Constitution didn't expect we would. Their view was to let the different parties and different branches of government go at it, and leave accountability for the voter to impose at the next elections.

The furor over Fast and Furious started out as a policy dispute, with Congress trying to find out who ordered what and why. Mr. Holder has helped escalate the issue into a contempt vote by his stonewalling response.

The fuss over national-security leaks is different. Unlike stupid policy decisions, leaking classified information is inherently criminal. That's why Mr. Holder has appointed two U.S. attorneys to investigate.

President Obama says his White House didn't leak. But books and news stories—about drones, the virus that attacked Iranian computers and more—cite as their sources the president's advisers and former advisers.
 
That's the reason why Mr. McCain and others are calling for a special prosecutor: How can attorneys who report to Mr. Holder oversee any credible investigation of their boss? Especially when, instead of saying he will fire anyone found to have leaked, President Obama publicly asserts that there have been no leaks?
 
Perhaps after a few years and gazillions of tax dollars, a special prosecutor would give his results. What purpose, however, is served by keeping those answers to a prosecutor instead of to the American people? The proper vehicle for getting answers is Congress, using its oversight powers to conduct hearings and get the appropriate officials on the record and under oath.

The best outcome would be for Mr. Holder to reach an accommodation with the House Oversight Committee's Darrell Issa (R., Calif.) that would avoid a contempt vote altogether. Unfortunately for the attorney general, he enters the conversation with a highly politicized record—here investigating CIA interrogators whose intel would later help his president hunt down bin Laden, there declining to defend the Defense of Marriage Act, there again declining to prosecute Black Panthers for voter intimidation.

Mr. Issa and House Speaker John Boehner have their own calculations to make. They must weigh whether holding the attorney general in contempt would backfire if Americans decided it was the latest Beltway attempt to criminalize policy differences. Forcing that political calculation is also as the Framers intended.

For tea partiers, this is a crisis that shouldn't go to waste. We're well reminded of the Obama people who today express doubts about a special prosecutor but sang a very different song when Bush administration folks were the target. We're even better reminded that the possibility that the nation's highest law enforcement officer might be held in criminal contempt by Congress means we need not look outside the Constitution for accountability.
 
Write to MainStreet@wsj.com
 
A version of this article appeared June 19, 2012, on page A11 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: Eric Holder's Politics of Contempt

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #112 on: June 20, 2012, 05:44:49 AM »
Is this the end of Eric Holder’s games?
By MICHAEL A. WALSH


Last Updated: 6:11 AM, June 20, 2012

Posted: 12:13 AM, June 20, 2012

Bait-and-switch? Or breath-taking chutzpah? Either way, Eric Holder is in big trouble.

The embattled attorney general destroyed what little is left of his credibility yesterday afternoon when he failed to turn over 1,300 subpoenaed and unredacted documents in the Fast and Furious gunrunning scandal to House investigators led by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.).

How did the Justice Department come to OK an operation that handed massive firepower to Mexico’s drug lords, with no hope of tracing the guns and without a word to the Mexican government? Still no good answers, some 18 months after one of those guns was found at the site of the murder of a US Border Patrol agent, while countless others have been used to kill innocent Mexicans.

Nor has Justice handed over more than a token number of the duly subpoenaed documents that might help explain the disaster.

Instead, in a 20-minute meeting that Holder himself had requested to stave off today’s planned contempt citation vote in Issa’s committee, he merely offered to “brief” Issa on their contents.

Holder’s insulting, 11th-hour offer came after he’d already missed a morning deadline to turn over the documents — a small percentage of the total number that Congress has demanded as it tries to get to the bottom of the scandal.

Issa surely feels like Charlie Brown charging the football, with Holder as Lucy. For over a year, he’s been trying to pin down the slippery AG, issuing one “last chance” after another, dragging Holder in front of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (on top of Senate appearances) and firing off angry letter after angry letter.

Each time, Holder has scampered off, meeting Issa’s legitimate demands with contempt — for the congressman, the Congress itself and the rule of law.

He tried it again yesterday after his offer was rebuffed, calling Issa’s demands “political gamesmanship” and cracking, “The ball’s in their court.”

Um . . . no, Mr. Attorney General. The ball’s in your court — and has been ever since Justice took the extraordinary step of formally “withdrawing” a Feb. 4, 2011 letter from assistant AG Ron Weich — who announced last week that he’s leaving Justice to become dean of the University of Baltimore law school.

Weich is just the latest F&F figure to jump ship, after ex-US Attorney for Arizona Dennis Burke and former acting head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Ken Melson.

Weich’s letter definitively denied allegations that the ATF, which supervised the F&F operation, “knowingly allowed the sale of assault weapons” to straw buyers acting on behalf of Mexican drug cartels.

Oops. In December, Holder told Congress that Weich’s letter was now inoperable, then promptly clammed up again, making it clear he has something — something big — to hide from Congress and the American people.

Which is why — unless he produces the documents before 10 a.m. this morning — Holder is looking at a House committee vote on contempt of Congress charges; once the full House goes along, he’ll be only the 11th official to be so cited since 1975.

Then what? Technically, the citation goes to the US attorney for DC to present to a grand jury. Usually, lawyers for the White House and Congress huddle and work out some accommodation — but relations may be too poisonous for that now.

Holder also has the option to simply not prosecute himself — which would surely set off a firestorm, as would any attempt by him or the president to assert executive privilege at this late date.

The last thing President Obama needs heading into the election is even more controversy over his hyper-politicized chief law-enforcement officer — especially with some in Congress already calling for a special prosecutor to investigate intelligence leaks emanating from the administration.

So Holder’s in a pickle, looking at up to a year in jail should he be convicted. And convictions do happen — just ask former EPA official Rita Lavelle, convicted of lying to Congress back in 1983.

Even should the AG finally come across with the documents, Issa must not let up. Holder has thumbed his nose at Congress and the country for too long. It’s time for the truth.



Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/is_this_the_end_of_eric_holder_games_CNV5Tn2OyMsyTgIv6EV3pI#ixzz1yKx8lN1R


dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #113 on: June 20, 2012, 07:21:08 AM »
because they're not black

Figures you would bring race into it like all weak minded liberals do when they have no talking points left to defend their idiotic opinions.

You are a racist. You only post on racist threads or you try to hijack every thread by accusing everyone of racism.

Listen, sparky. Obama and Holders are idiots. Plain and simple. They are incompetent. They just happen to be black, but they are still imbeciles. You only defend them because they match your pigmentation. Shame on you.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #114 on: June 20, 2012, 07:23:13 AM »
Figures you would bring race into it like all weak minded liberals do when they have no talking points left to defend their idiotic opinions.

You are a racist. You only post on racist threads or you try to hijack every thread by accusing everyone of racism.

Listen, sparky. Obama and Holders are idiots. Plain and simple. They are incompetent. They just happen to be black, but they are still imbeciles. You only defend them because they match your pigmentation. Shame on you.

Andre - like the other 95ers are more racist than anyone and would defend obama and holder if they put them in chains and shackles and sent them to africa.



andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #115 on: June 20, 2012, 03:55:08 PM »
Figures you would bring race into it like all weak minded liberals do when they have no talking points left to defend their idiotic opinions.

You are a racist. You only post on racist threads or you try to hijack every thread by accusing everyone of racism.

Listen, sparky. Obama and Holders are idiots. Plain and simple. They are incompetent. They just happen to be black, but they are still imbeciles. You only defend them because they match your pigmentation. Shame on you.

sigh...read the whole thread instead of coming on in the middle of an argument like you usually do........I actually agreed with 3333 that Holder was in the top five WORST Attorney Generals........I only accused 3333 of being a racist...which he is..he's admitted it on more than one occasion

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #116 on: June 20, 2012, 05:24:16 PM »
 :)


I attended a black bar association meeting of westchester tonight in mt vernon.  Made friends w some great folks tonight bro.



sigh...read the whole thread instead of coming on in the middle of an argument like you usually do........I actually agreed with 3333 that Holder was in the top five WORST Attorney Generals........I only accused 3333 of being a racist...which he is..he's admitted it on more than one occasion

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #117 on: June 21, 2012, 12:06:50 PM »
This is WND printer-friendly version of the article which follows.
 To view this item online, visit http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/holder-prosecutes-mom-and-pop-fat-cats-walk/


WND EXCLUSIVE

Holder prosecutes mom and pop, fat cats walk

Yet another scandal for Obama's embattled attorney general


Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., is a WND senior staff reporter. He has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Corsi's latest book is "Where's the REAL Birth Certificate?"




MIAMI BEACH, Fla. – With great fanfare, President Obama signed Executive Order 13519 on Nov. 17, 2009, establishing a Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force to be led by Attorney General Eric Holder with the aim of prosecuting fraud and recovering assets in the economic debacle that began one year earlier.
 
In 2010, the Mortgage Fraud Working Group organized under the executive order issued its first annual report, boasting that the number of mortgage fraud defendants charged by the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices more than doubled from 526 in fiscal year 2009 to 1,235 in fiscal year 2010. A similar increase was reported in the number of mortgage fraud cases charged, going from 267 in 2009 to 656 in 2010.
 
However, WND research has demonstrated that the mortgage fraud cases pursued by Holder’s Department of Justice have typically targeted homeowners charged with making fraudulent loan applications. Largely ignored are the financial institutions that made the loans and prominent Democrat donors and colleagues of Obama administration officials.
 
High friends in high places
 
As WND has previously reported, Holder has overlooked possibly fraudulent “loan to own” equity recapitalization loans Credit Suisse made to some 15 or more luxury resorts or to various principles involved in the transactions, including supermarket billionaire Ron Burkle, a long-time Democratic Party operative with a history of providing financial support to top Democrats, including Bill and Hillary Clinton.
 
WND has also reported that Credit Suisse is a client of the Washington-based law firm that Holder left as a partner to become attorney general and Lanny Breuer left as a partner to head of the Justice Department criminal division under Holder.
 
The firm, Covington & Burling, represents “a Who’s Who of big banks and other companies at the center of alleged foreclosure fraud,” Reuters reported Jan. 20.
 
In addition to Credit Suisse, they include Bank of America, Citibank, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo & Co. and at least one other bank among the top 10 largest mortgage servicers.
 
Holder prosecutes mom and pop
 
On Feb 19, 2011, New York Times Op-Ed writer Joe Nocera lamented that Holder and the Justice Department had decided not to prosecute Angelo R. Mozilo, the high-flying former CEO of Countrywide Financial, one of the mortgage lending firms most responsible for the continuing mortgage crisis.
 
“Hundreds of billions of dollars have been lost by investors while millions of borrowers have lost their homes,” Nocera wrote, recalling that Mozilo sold $140 million in Countrywide stock while his company was failing. “Few of the people who ran the institutions that contributed to the disaster have been found liable.”
 
On March 25, 2011, Nocera contrasted the kind treatment Mozilo received at the hands of Holder’s DOJ with the experience of 48 year-old Charlie Engle. Engle caught the attention of Robert W. Nordlander, an IRS special agent, after movie actor Matt Damon financed a documentary film titled “Running the Sahara,” featuring Engle’s ultra-marathon challenge.
 
Convinced Engle was understating his taxes, Nordlander resorted to a dumpster dive for records Engle may have thrown away, unwilling to believe that all Engle earned from the documentary was $30,000.
 
Still unsatisfied, Nordlander hired an attractive female undercover agent to meet Engle and see if she could entice him into making admissions.
 
Engle’s crime, for which Holder’s U.S. Attorneys sent him to prison as a felon, was that he took out a “liar loan,” overstating his income.
 
“Charlie has always insisted that he never filled out the loan document – his mortgage broker did it, and he was actually a victim of mortgage fraud,” Nocera wrote in yet another editorial on Richard Engle, published June 1, in which he noted the broker later pleaded guilty to another mortgage fraud.
 
“Indeed, according to a recent court filing by Charlie’s lawyer, the government failed to turn over exculpatory evidence that could have helped Charlie prove his innocence.”
 
Nocera’s conclusion: “For whatever inexplicable reason, prosecutors really wanted to nail Charlie Engle. And they did.”
 
Another “small fry” touted by the DOJ in November 2009 as part of a Holder surge in mortgage fraud prosecutions was Lakeisha Gates.
 
In 2007, Gates worked as a clerk at a small brokerage firm in St. Petersburg, Fla.
 
Allegedly at the behest of the owners of the firm, Gretchen and Eric Scott, Gates acted as the nominee purchaser at grossly inflated values for two properties the Scotts owned. She misrepresented on the loan application that she made $5,000 per month as the vice president of a catering company.
 
Gates obtained a mortgage for $300,000, which soon defaulted. For her participation in the deal, Gates earned $10,000.
 
She pleaded guilty to federal mortgage fraud charges and agreed to testify against the Scotts, who she said put her up to it. The Scotts were charged with a conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud.
 
When the Mortgage Fraud Working Group boasts of prosecuting mortgage fraud, the cases typically involve individual borrowers who had lied or otherwise committed fraud by obtaining mortgages on one or more properties.
 
Those the Obama administration allows to walk free are the likes of Angelo Mozilo, who built an empire making highly inflated mortgages based on questionable appraisals to lenders who were never properly credit-qualified. Mozilo amassed a fortune that enabled him to pay a $67.5 million fine to settle Securities and Exchange Commission fraud charges without appreciably denting his massive net worth.
 
WND has previously reported how Countrywide Financial Group gave preferential “friends of Angelo Mozilo” loans to Democrats Franklin Raines and James Johnson, who each made millions personally while holding executive positions in Fannie Mae amid the irresponsible mortgage activities each directed to the ultimate detriment of the taxpayer.
 
Nocera’s conclusion was that the Justice Department has taken after “the smallest of small fry – and then trumpeted these prosecutions of how tough it is on mortgage fraud.”
 
He wrote: “It is a shameful way for the government to act.”
 
‘The fix is in’
 
WND has previously reported that Edra Blixseth, the former spouse of Tim Blixseth, the founder of Yellowstone Club, has teamed with Ron Burkle, the supermarket billionaire who was a major donor to Hillary Clinton in her 2008 presidential campaign.
 
Mike Flynn, attorney for Tim Blixseth, has explained to WND his reasons for believing Burkle used his political connections with Holder and Breuer to quash criminal investigations regarding Edra Blixseth.
 
“The Holder/Breuer-controlled Justice Department quashed the entire investigation; they declared the Yellowstone Club ‘off limits,’ and even the ‘connected’ bankruptcy judge Ralph Kirscher, who declared Edra exonerated and discharged from all liability,” Flynn told WND.
 
“The Holder DOJ and Judge Kirscher made the decisions to sweep away the pending Montana Yellowstone Club investigation and proposed indictment of Edra Blixseth in the face of the documented, irrefutable evidence,” he said.
 
Flynn provided WND evidence of a series of questionable loans and various financing attempts to gain ownership of the Yellowstone Club at prices deeply under market undertaken by Edra Blixseth, beginning in June 2007. The transactions resulted in millions of dollars of defaulted loans. Meanwhile, Blixseth, Burkle, various hedge fund investors and Credit Suisse ended up owning the Yellowstone Club for under $10 million.
 
“Some of the loan documents, Edra Blixseth used to commit this massive fraud or so grossly false on their face for tens of millions of dollars, that it makes the Edra Blixseth case appear to be a cover-up resulting from rank cronyism or worse,” Flynn said.
 
Flynn told WND his office provided the Obama-appointed Montana U.S. Attorney with documentary evidence proving that while Edra Blixseth was signing perjured loan documents with banks, she was contemporaneously signing sealed affidavits in her divorce reciting the opposite of what she was stating to the banks – in both instances to obtain millions of dollars in her divorce and tens of millions from the banks.
 
“Tens of millions of dollars of the Edra Blixseth loans have never been paid to creditors or accounted for,” Flynn said.
 
“Burke and Sam Byrne of the Boston-based hedge fund CrossHarbor Capital Parthers have ended up with $800 million in Blixseth assets, while the Democratic bankruptcy judge has swept all the documentary evidence under the rug. Judge Kirscher has discharged Edra Blixseth, and the Holder/Breuer DOJ has quashed all criminal investigation as ‘off limits.’”


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #118 on: June 26, 2012, 12:27:44 PM »

Eric Holder: 'It’s Going to Get Really Busy on Thursday, Apparently'

2:00 PM, Jun 26, 2012 • By DANIEL HALPER

via Drudge


Attorney General Eric Holder avoided commenting on the Fast and Furious scandal in Boston today. The Boston Herald reports:


Embattled Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. refused to say today whether he would consider resigning if a federal probe into the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ disastrous “Fast and Furious” operation threatens President Obama’s re-election.
 
The question was posed to Holder by a Herald reporter at the Seaport World Trade Center, where he delivered a keynote address on the state of civil rights to a packed room of federal prosecutors and local law enforcement. Holder kept on walking and didn’t answer.
 
In just two days, the U.S. House of Representatives is expected to take a historic vote, potentially to hold Holder in contempt of Congress for allegedly refusing to turn over documents about the two-year gun-tracking investigation in Mexico that resulted in the murder of a Border Patrol agent.
 
Later, Holder made an oblique reference to the House vote scheduled for Thursday on whether to hold the attorney general in contempt. "It’s going to get really busy on Thursday, apparently," Holder said, according to the Boston Herald. Holder's comment was reportedly met with "awkward laughs."


A self-effacing Holder drew awkward laughs from the symposium hosted by longtime pal U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz when, while touching upon how busy his schedule is, he said, “It’s going to get really busy on Thursday, apparently.”
 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63696
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #119 on: June 26, 2012, 05:20:34 PM »
He should resign already.  Nothing but a major distraction at this point.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #120 on: June 27, 2012, 04:48:00 AM »
Team Obama's Brother Sharpton Moment
 Townhall.com ^ | June 27, 2012 | Michelle Malkin



Attorney General Eric Holder's people have no shame. After months of stonewalling, misinformation and petulant disregard for the victims of the Fast and Furious gunwalking scandal, President Obama's Justice Department is hiding behind the most despicable race-card demagogues on the planet. "Post-racial" America never looked so bitter, clingy and cowardly.

At a Tuesday press conference in Washington, D.C., human shield Al Sharpton condemned the upcoming House vote on a contempt motion against Holder as "reckless" and "morally reprehensible." Yes, the infamous hate-crimes hoaxer, cop-basher and riot incitement specialist is now the self-appointed sheriff of Capitol Hill morality. A Huffington Post report hyping Sharpton's protection racket decried the contempt citation as an "assault on minority rights." In typical race-baiting style, Sharpton told the leftwing website: "I'm not saying that this is because Holder is black, and I'm not calling (Republicans) racists. I'm saying what they're doing has a racial effect."

Of course Sharpton's accusing Republicans of racism -- and by extension, he's smearing every American demanding truth and justice in Obama's bloodiest scandal. That includes the family of murdered Border Patrol agent Brian Terry, whose December 2011 death came at the hands of a Mexican thug wielding a Fast and Furious weapon. What about the Mexican government officials left in the dark about the deadly operation? And the hundreds of families of Mexican victims of Fast and Furious-enabled bloodshed? Yes, yes, they are all racists and minority vote suppression advocates, too.

Sharpton forged ahead, comparing the effort to hold Holder accountable for his serial delays and deception to racial profiling. The race-hustling reverend invoked driving-while-black imagery in lambasting the Republican oversight staffers who have "stopped and frisked" Holder, the nation's first black attorney general, "without probable cause" to be "made an example of."

While he regurgitated DOJ talking points about Holder's "unprecedented" level of cooperation, Sharpton neglected to mention that the agency has delivered less than 8 percent of the 80,000 documents sought by congressional investigators. He forgot to acknowledge that of the 70 DOJ officials involved in Fast and Furious, 48 have been blocked by DOJ from testifying. He failed to detail the withdrawn Feb. 4, 2011, letter to Congress falsely denying the existence of Fast and Furious, Holder's flip-flops over what he knew and when, and Holder's blame-shifting assertion, withdrawn last week, that falsely accused former Bush Attorney General Michael Mukasey of being briefed on a separate gunwalking operation.

Lest we forget, the White House's racial guardian and MSNBC host is the same bigoted clown who manufactured the Tawana Brawley fake hate crime and tried to frame police officers, railed against "Chinamen," "Greek homos" and "n****rs," inveighed against Jewish "diamond merchants," and stoked black mobs at white-owned Freddy's Fashion Mart in Harlem, which was burned to the ground in 1995 after protesters broke in and gunned down four employees.

Team Obama can no more dissociate itself from Sharpton's bloody legacy than Sharpton can dissociate himself from his own poisonous tongue. In return for his blind and tireless defense over the past year and a half, Holder has publicly embraced Sharpton and endorsed his toxic racial smokescreen. In April, Holder lavished praise on Sharpton "for your partnership, your friendship and your tireless efforts to speak out for the voiceless, to stand up for the powerless and to shine a light on the problems we must solve and the promises we must fulfill." Obama himself addressed Sharpton's spring convention, as did several other Cabinet secretaries. White House visitor logs show more than a dozen entries for "Al Sharpton" or "Alfred Sharpton" over the past three years.

President Clinton had his Sister Souljah moment: a public attempt in 1992 to distance Democrats from radical racial demagoguery. The current White House has turned that centrist maneuver on its head, and American voters of good will shouldn't forget it. Obama's Brother Sharpton moment, a calculated deflection from the Fast and Furious scandal, is an unrepentant bear hug of racial extremism. Shame, shame, shame.

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #121 on: June 27, 2012, 04:58:01 AM »

House Dem breaks from party, plans to vote for Holder contempt
Published June 27, 2012
The Daily Caller

The Democratic Party’s resistance to holding Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress is crumbling.

Utah Democratic Rep. Jim Matheson said Tuesday he plans to vote in favor of holding Holder in contempt over his refusal to comply with a subpoena into the Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

“It just compounds the tragedy when both sides play politics instead of releasing the facts. The Terry family, the public and Congress deserve answers,” Matheson said in remarks first reported by the Salt Lake Tribune in his home state. “Sadly, it seems that it will take holding the attorney general in contempt to communicate that evasiveness is unacceptable.”

To make matters worse for Holder, President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, more Democrats are expected to join Matheson in holding Holder in contempt. House Minority Whip Rep. Steny Hoyer, the House Democrats’ chief vote-counter, isn’t even sure how many Democrats will break ranks. According to the Associated Press — which framed the Democratic defections as a result of the NRA’s decision to score the vote — Hoyer wouldn’t say how many Democrats he expected to vote in favor of Holder in contempt, but confirmed he expects some, like Matheson, to abandon party lines.

These Democratic defections cut sharply into the narrative House oversight committee ranking Democratic member Rep. Elijah Cummings, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, the White House and Holder himself have created around this scandal. They have all claimed that House oversight committee chairman Rep. Darrell Issa and House Republicans are motivated by partisan politics in pursuing this issue, something that Matheson and other Democrats’ vote would undercut.



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/26/house-dem-breaks-from-party-plans-to-vote-for-holder-contempt/#ixzz1yzhB6nxP

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39373
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #122 on: June 27, 2012, 05:05:39 AM »
House Dem breaks from party, plans to vote for Holder contempt
Published June 27, 2012
The Daily Caller

The Democratic Party’s resistance to holding Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress is crumbling.

Utah Democratic Rep. Jim Matheson said Tuesday he plans to vote in favor of holding Holder in contempt over his refusal to comply with a subpoena into the Operation Fast and Furious scandal.

“It just compounds the tragedy when both sides play politics instead of releasing the facts. The Terry family, the public and Congress deserve answers,” Matheson said in remarks first reported by the Salt Lake Tribune in his home state. “Sadly, it seems that it will take holding the attorney general in contempt to communicate that evasiveness is unacceptable.”

To make matters worse for Holder, President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party, more Democrats are expected to join Matheson in holding Holder in contempt. House Minority Whip Rep. Steny Hoyer, the House Democrats’ chief vote-counter, isn’t even sure how many Democrats will break ranks. According to the Associated Press — which framed the Democratic defections as a result of the NRA’s decision to score the vote — Hoyer wouldn’t say how many Democrats he expected to vote in favor of Holder in contempt, but confirmed he expects some, like Matheson, to abandon party lines.

These Democratic defections cut sharply into the narrative House oversight committee ranking Democratic member Rep. Elijah Cummings, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, the White House and Holder himself have created around this scandal. They have all claimed that House oversight committee chairman Rep. Darrell Issa and House Republicans are motivated by partisan politics in pursuing this issue, something that Matheson and other Democrats’ vote would undercut.



Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/26/house-dem-breaks-from-party-plans-to-vote-for-holder-contempt/#ixzz1yzhB6nxP


I already wrote a letter to my congresscunt to vote for contempt of this racist neo-terrorist AG

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #123 on: June 27, 2012, 05:18:03 AM »

I already wrote a letter to my congresscunt to vote for contempt of this racist neo-terrorist AG

Of course you did good for you. Now fuck off

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: The worst attorney general in American History
« Reply #124 on: June 27, 2012, 07:22:55 AM »

I already wrote a letter to my congresscunt to vote for contempt of this racist neo-terrorist AG

I'm sure he read it avidly