« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion  (Read 6995 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83312
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« on: January 31, 2011, 02:26:11 PM »
 ;D

and people claim Flex was the lazy one?
Logged

epic_alien

  • Guest
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2011, 02:37:16 PM »
after looking at it, and other shots of him in many contests, just standing there, i dont think he gave a fuck
Logged

dogbowl

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1012
  • Team anyone except heath
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2011, 02:40:39 PM »
He is "unco", as we say in Australia


Logged

che

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16844
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2011, 02:40:51 PM »
Logged

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17201
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2011, 02:41:50 PM »
Dillet didn't know how to pose but in this pic his legs aren't even flexed at all (no homo).
Is this the "pre-synthol" Flex?
Logged

YoungBlood

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6777
  • Weee!
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2011, 04:11:14 PM »

Paul couldn't pose, and he was lazy in the gym and was hoping to get by on his genetics. Flex was similar depending on what phase of his career he was in. He seemed to work a lot harder prior to his shaved head/latter period. I've never heard anything about Paul being anything but a lazy trainer, matter of fact any article I've ever seen/read on the guy, he was poked and prodded at for being so lazy and his excuse was usually "I don't want to do a photoshoot and get hurt" or something to that effect.
Logged

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2011, 04:15:11 PM »
Quote from: che on January 31, 2011, 02:40:51 PM


I remember seeing that picture of a 17 year-old Dillett in Flex magazine way back in the 90's and my first thought was "that girl looks embarrassed as hell to be seen with him".  :-\
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2011, 04:26:52 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 31, 2011, 02:26:11 PM
;D

and people claim Flex was the lazy one?
This came from Musclemag, 1997, it was a set of three pics, I believe. I had the poster, and it made me lift like a madman...

*Flex had sideburns...
Logged

KevinP85

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2262
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2011, 05:26:26 PM »
That's because Dillet was on low dosages :)
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #9 on: January 31, 2011, 05:44:05 PM »
Quote from: KevinP85 on January 31, 2011, 05:26:26 PM
That's because Dillet was on low dosages :)
Lee priest had said that Dillett used low doses. Low doses to get to 280-285,lol. But, he only trained--for a pump, that is about it...He didn't squat, said it was useless for him.

Actually, why would low doses be the reason why he was massive, but Flex showed him up, and won that show?

*edit, this was in 1996, as Shawn Ray was at this contest as well.
Logged

el numero uno

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9405
  • Clean your room, bucko.
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #10 on: January 31, 2011, 06:02:18 PM »
Logged

jdooly

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 737
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #11 on: January 31, 2011, 06:31:17 PM »
it's prolly just the timing of the shot.  I'd be he's just letting go, while Flex held it a half-second longer, the shot was taken, published, and eveyone's all "OMG Dillet can't pose!" ::)
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #12 on: January 31, 2011, 06:36:25 PM »
Quote from: jdooly on January 31, 2011, 06:31:17 PM
it's prolly just the timing of the shot.  I'd be he's just letting go, while Flex held it a half-second longer, the shot was taken, published, and eveyone's all "OMG Dillet can't pose!" ::)
It was three shots. First shot, Flex is holding up his finger as if to say, "This is how you do it."
Second shot, Flex is beginning the crab shot, this is the last shot...the Poster showed him doing the shot fully, with I think a slight turn of the neck.
Logged

Reeves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #13 on: January 31, 2011, 09:12:49 PM »
Two guys that are nothing without their "chemical enhancers".  With drugs they  both have good physiques and I think Dillet is the better of the two due to his height advantage.  Flex is almost as much of a gnome as me.  ;D Didn't Flex get a new kidney a while back?  What a waste of a donation, kinda like rock legend and societal loser David Crosby.   Has little Flex ruined that one yet and if so, will he blame it on a congenital disorder?  What a maroon.  Both of Flex and Paul.
Logged

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #14 on: January 31, 2011, 09:32:59 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 31, 2011, 02:26:11 PM
;D

and people claim Flex was the lazy one?


coming from you...... i know ur not serious


flex is caught in full pose/contraction of every muscle

we all know paul couldn't pose .... but hes not even near the pose by pauls standards....

pauls most muscular was about his best pose im sure....ab thigh aswell maybe ....about the only poses he could hit consistantly well


imagine if paul could pose as well as flex.........
Logged

Stockist

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 43
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #15 on: January 31, 2011, 10:04:21 PM »
Quote from: Xerxes on January 31, 2011, 02:33:44 PM
Dillett seriously has to be retarded to pose like that, its like he has no control over his body  ???

You're right, sometimes they had to carry him on and off the stage


Logged

Master Blaster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6610
  • Not sure if getbig full of trolls or trolls getbig
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #16 on: January 31, 2011, 10:22:24 PM »
Quote from: Stockist on January 31, 2011, 10:04:21 PM
You're right, sometimes they had to carry him on and off the stage





sometimes I carry you mom on and off the stage
Logged

alpha rogue831

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #17 on: January 31, 2011, 10:40:12 PM »
I never saw Dillett compete, but I did see him guest pose.  Conditioning wise, he was in pretty good shape, but his posing was terrible.  He was oblivious to his music, made no effort to coordinate a routine, and would literally stop in between poses to catch his breath!  With music blaring in the background, he'd be bent over gasping for air.....very polished.....very professional...
Logged

Hypo

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 878
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #18 on: February 01, 2011, 02:12:31 AM »
Quote from: Stockist on January 31, 2011, 10:04:21 PM
You're right, sometimes they had to carry him on and off the stage




I wish someone would post the video of that contest. Got to hear what Arnold said.
Logged

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #19 on: February 01, 2011, 02:16:17 AM »
Quote from: Stockist on January 31, 2011, 10:04:21 PM
You're right, sometimes they had to carry him on and off the stage




WTF?
Logged
糞

Fallsview

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5467
  • My Account Was Hacked. I'm REAL
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #20 on: February 01, 2011, 02:25:51 AM »
Wasn't Romano responsible for Paul's diuretic mishap?  Seems like all these guys in the 1990's were getting all screwed up with there potassium and water.



STAY POSITIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #21 on: February 01, 2011, 03:10:42 AM »
Quote from: DK II on February 01, 2011, 02:16:17 AM
WTF?
Why, that is just a chocolate statue that they are moving
Logged

alpmaster

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 103
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #22 on: February 01, 2011, 05:25:37 AM »
Quote from: Stockist on January 31, 2011, 10:04:21 PM
You're right, sometimes they had to carry him on and off the stage




The schmoes gang banging him... poor paul...
Logged

mass243

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12873
  • On right side of the history!
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #23 on: February 01, 2011, 05:49:21 AM »
Quote from: che on January 31, 2011, 02:40:51 PM


WUUUTF  :o

What is that? Looks huge!
Logged

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Flex owning Dillett into oblivion
« Reply #24 on: February 01, 2011, 06:27:21 AM »
Brutal picking the wrong picture

here you go stud

Flex who?

Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »