leaving when there is financial trouble? ironic you sound like the women you always complain about
a dog is loyal until the end, if you can't care for a dog than you aren't human
E
I was being tongue in cheek, if they were as smart as humans
and remember, one of the biggest reasons for divorce is due to finances...
it's good to be loyal, especially when the entity is ignorant to the situation at hand.
You are getting confused about be able to take care of a dog, and not taking care of essentials first.
Americans are too entrenched in their "wants" and "desires", they take for granted pets,
and your loyality comment speaks volumes. It's selfish to expect "loyalty", one accepts it as a given.
Man, especially Americans, want everything bent to their will, to serve at their whim, and when they can't have it, like spoiled children they cry.
When most of us got our first pet, we were role about the responsibilities of taking care of a pet. Feeding, walking, taking care of feces, shots, etc. Now, usually it was the parents who took care of the most important things, because they had the finances to do so. They had the income...then we as adults, want to replicate that. But, like a lot of people today, we confuse our wants with our needs. Nobody on here can actually say that they NEED a pet. Nobody can say that. Everybody on here can basically say that they got a pet because they WANTED a pet.
True love for our flora and fauna is to "want" what is best for that pet or entity and not selfishly think of our own desires of having them around for "our" company and "our" amusement. Let that animal be taken care of by someone who can afford to. Who has the luxury to do so.