« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Arnold's legs  (Read 12446 times)

wild willie

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5642
Arnold's legs
« on: April 01, 2011, 08:23:11 AM »
I will get flamed here..... but oh well.....


In recent weeks I have seen some surprising pics of the Oak's legs....and I must say.....in a lot of these shots.....his legs look to be pretty outstanding.

Unfortunately.....I don't have a scanner....but check out strength-oldschool.com......fantastic pics of Arnie and many of those shots are from his training for the 80 Olympia.

Arnold has always been known for chest and arms etc......but damn he had some legs too.....not like Platz or Waller......but better than many would give him credit for.

Let's discuss...
Logged

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2011, 08:47:36 AM »
in some shots they have some good cuts
Logged

theonlyone

  • Guest
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2011, 08:48:21 AM »
 26 inch legs
Logged

ARNIE1947

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1717
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2011, 09:02:15 AM »
OAK'S LEGS 8) 8) 8)
Logged

wild willie

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5642
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2011, 09:13:36 AM »
Thanks, Arnie1947!!!!

Awesome images of Shwarzy!!!
Logged

rccs

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3085
  • Alma Matter!
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2011, 10:11:00 AM »
BBING at its peak...
Logged
S

ARNIE1947

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1717
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2011, 10:16:02 AM »
Logged

Bam-bam

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4501
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2011, 10:19:20 AM »
and dont forget he was not a midget like your standard bb. I mean, if he was Che's height Im sure his legs would be almost Platz enormous!!
Logged

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2011, 10:51:10 AM »
That proportion between the limbs is way superior to the average proportions seen today.
Logged

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23817
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #9 on: April 01, 2011, 10:57:17 AM »
Quote from: #1 Klaus fan on April 01, 2011, 10:51:10 AM
That proportion between the limbs is way superior to the average proportions seen today.

Great frame based on genetics, even at his heaviest he looked tall and athletic.
Logged
.

French

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1877
  • Solana @ 2000$
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #10 on: April 01, 2011, 10:58:48 AM »
 8)

Logged
$

ARNIE1947

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1717
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #11 on: April 01, 2011, 11:06:05 AM »
 :D
Logged

ARNIE1947

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1717
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #12 on: April 01, 2011, 11:19:48 AM »
Logged

hench

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8449
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #13 on: April 01, 2011, 11:29:30 AM »
peak Arnold had excellent thighs, good size and deep cuts, calves diamond like with great definition
Logged

nufc0101

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 102
  • Part timer
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #14 on: April 01, 2011, 01:55:00 PM »
not the biggest but still some of the best (no homo)
Logged

Heywood

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1396
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #15 on: April 01, 2011, 02:20:06 PM »
If there are 10 photos of Arnold with good legs, there are 1,000 showing them looking weak.

just sayin......

Logged

flexingtonsteele

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5653
  • The new age pussy Punisher!
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #16 on: April 01, 2011, 03:24:13 PM »
They werent big, but when he was in shape they had fantastic seperation.
Logged

Mr Anabolic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10647
  • Better to die on your feet than on your knees.
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2011, 03:29:58 PM »
'73 and '74... dude was packed and ripped... on a different planet compared to everyone else... totally untouchable.
Logged

TacoBell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
  • Team FTN
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2011, 04:41:54 PM »
Nothing like a friday afternoon thread about a mans legs.
Logged

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2011, 05:19:48 PM »
Logged

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14167
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2011, 05:21:23 PM »
Quote from: ARNIE1947 on April 01, 2011, 11:19:48 AM

 oak's calves........

I see your calves and I raise you the Oak's cock...



"1"
Logged

jwb

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5811
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #21 on: April 01, 2011, 05:28:44 PM »
Quote from: Mr Anabolic on April 01, 2011, 03:29:58 PM
'73 and '74... dude was packed and ripped... on a different planet compared to everyone else... totally untouchable.
Exactly what I was gonna say 1973 and 1974 is when his legs are biggest and he is untouchable.
Logged

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #22 on: April 01, 2011, 05:33:58 PM »
Quote from: #1 Klaus fan on April 01, 2011, 10:51:10 AM
That proportion between the limbs is way superior to the average proportions seen today.

x2
Logged
糞

Cableguy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1722
  • Cableguy no longer...
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #23 on: April 01, 2011, 05:47:54 PM »
Vince Taylor had kind of similar proportion for legs size wise at his peak.
Logged

ARNIE1947

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1717
Re: Arnold's legs
« Reply #24 on: April 01, 2011, 08:47:08 PM »
Quote from: Mr Anabolic on April 01, 2011, 03:29:58 PM
'73 and '74... dude was packed and ripped... on a different planet compared to everyone else... totally untouchable.


I  would also include 1971
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »