|
wild willie
|
 |
« on: April 01, 2011, 07:23:11 AM » |
|
I will get flamed here..... but oh well.....
In recent weeks I have seen some surprising pics of the Oak's legs....and I must say.....in a lot of these shots.....his legs look to be pretty outstanding.
Unfortunately.....I don't have a scanner....but check out strength-oldschool.com......fantastic pics of Arnie and many of those shots are from his training for the 80 Olympia.
Arnold has always been known for chest and arms etc......but damn he had some legs too.....not like Platz or Waller......but better than many would give him credit for.
Let's discuss...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stavios
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2011, 07:47:36 AM » |
|
in some shots they have some good cuts
|
|
|
|
|
|
theonlyone
Guest
|
|
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2011, 07:48:21 AM » |
|
26 inch legs
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARNIE1947
|
|
« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2011, 08:02:15 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wild willie
|
|
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2011, 08:13:36 AM » |
|
Thanks, Arnie1947!!!!
Awesome images of Shwarzy!!!
|
|
|
|
|
rccs
Getbig IV
Posts: 3086
Alma Matter!
|
|
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2011, 09:11:00 AM » |
|
BBING at its peak...
|
S
|
|
|
|
ARNIE1947
|
|
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2011, 09:16:02 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bam-bam
|
|
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2011, 09:19:20 AM » |
|
and dont forget he was not a midget like your standard bb. I mean, if he was Che's height Im sure his legs would be almost Platz enormous!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 Klaus fan
|
|
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2011, 09:51:10 AM » |
|
That proportion between the limbs is way superior to the average proportions seen today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
_bruce_
|
|
« Reply #9 on: April 01, 2011, 09:57:17 AM » |
|
That proportion between the limbs is way superior to the average proportions seen today.
Great frame based on genetics, even at his heaviest he looked tall and athletic. |
?
|
|
|
|
French
|
|
« Reply #10 on: April 01, 2011, 09:58:48 AM » |
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
ARNIE1947
|
|
« Reply #11 on: April 01, 2011, 10:06:05 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARNIE1947
|
|
« Reply #12 on: April 01, 2011, 10:19:48 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hench
|
|
« Reply #13 on: April 01, 2011, 10:29:30 AM » |
|
peak Arnold had excellent thighs, good size and deep cuts, calves diamond like with great definition
|
|
|
|
|
nufc0101
Getbig II
Gender: 
Posts: 92
Part timer
|
|
« Reply #14 on: April 01, 2011, 12:55:00 PM » |
|
not the biggest but still some of the best (no homo)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heywood
|
|
« Reply #15 on: April 01, 2011, 01:20:06 PM » |
|
If there are 10 photos of Arnold with good legs, there are 1,000 showing them looking weak.
just sayin......
|
|
|
|
|
flexingtonsteele
Competitors II
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 5659
The new age pussy Punisher!
|
|
« Reply #16 on: April 01, 2011, 02:24:13 PM » |
|
They werent big, but when he was in shape they had fantastic seperation.
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Anabolic
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 8571
"If you don't have it... then don't hit it"
|
|
« Reply #17 on: April 01, 2011, 02:29:58 PM » |
|
'73 and '74... dude was packed and ripped... on a different planet compared to everyone else... totally untouchable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TacoBell
|
|
« Reply #18 on: April 01, 2011, 03:41:54 PM » |
|
Nothing like a friday afternoon thread about a mans legs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nails
|
|
« Reply #19 on: April 01, 2011, 04:19:48 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OneMoreRep
Moderator
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 10535
|
|
« Reply #20 on: April 01, 2011, 04:21:23 PM » |
|
oak's calves........
I see your calves and I raise you the Oak's cock...  " 1" |
|
|
|
|
|
jwb
|
|
« Reply #21 on: April 01, 2011, 04:28:44 PM » |
|
'73 and '74... dude was packed and ripped... on a different planet compared to everyone else... totally untouchable.
Exactly what I was gonna say 1973 and 1974 is when his legs are biggest and he is untouchable. |
|
|
|
|
|
DK II
|
|
« Reply #22 on: April 01, 2011, 04:33:58 PM » |
|
That proportion between the limbs is way superior to the average proportions seen today.
x2 |
糞
|
|
|
Cableguy
Getbig IV
Gender:
Posts: 1650
Cableguy no longer...
|
|
« Reply #23 on: April 01, 2011, 04:47:54 PM » |
|
Vince Taylor had kind of similar proportion for legs size wise at his peak.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARNIE1947
|
|
« Reply #24 on: April 01, 2011, 07:47:08 PM » |
|
'73 and '74... dude was packed and ripped... on a different planet compared to everyone else... totally untouchable.
I would also include 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
