Author Topic: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?  (Read 70068 times)

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #225 on: April 12, 2011, 01:58:47 PM »

NO black & white pic of Ronnie is grainy , he was never grainy no matter how many pics you make B&W  ;)

Dorian was grainy in COLOR  ;)



Way to concede my second point. Your argument is in black and white and it's still inferior.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83803
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #226 on: April 12, 2011, 02:00:32 PM »
Way to concede my second point. Your argument is in black and white and it's still inferior.

The picture is in black & white NOT my argument and again tamper with all the pics you want people who seen Yates in living color say he was grainy has nothing to do with a photograph

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #227 on: April 12, 2011, 02:07:56 PM »
NO black & white pic of Ronnie is grainy , he was never grainy no matter how many pics you make B&W

Dorian was grainy in COLOR

this has to be one of the dumbest arguments ever. What objective criteria do you use to determine what is "grainy?"

brb, arguing that Ronnie is better b/c he has more swagger

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #228 on: April 12, 2011, 02:09:25 PM »
this has to be one of the dumbest arguments ever. What objective criteria do you use to determine what is "grainy?"

brb, saying Ronnie is better b/c he has more swagger
if it's dorian it's grainy because it said so in the magazine


Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #229 on: April 12, 2011, 02:11:12 PM »
Read. title. thread.

Anyway your argument is grainy, b/w, dense and from 1993. And your argument hasn't actually ever made it to a stage, thus negating itself.

However, if your one-off pic argument can be accepted, so can the one-off Ronnie '03 back double biceps pic  :)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83803
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #230 on: April 12, 2011, 02:12:57 PM »
this has to be one of the dumbest arguments ever. What objective criteria do you use to determine what is "grainy?"

brb, arguing that Ronnie is better b/c he has more swagger

Hahahahah who said Dorian was better because if that? who said that was an argument? NO ONE shouldn't you be using my arguments on another forum?  ;) but please pay attention to what they are , He keeps making black & white shots of Ronnie claiming he's somehow now magically grainy , he's obsessed with it not me. I don't care about grainy because Dorian is meets the criteria better grainy is an adjective to describe his unmatched conditioning


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83803
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #231 on: April 12, 2011, 02:17:24 PM »
Read. title. thread.

Anyway your argument is grainy, b/w, dense and from 1993. And your argument hasn't actually ever made it to a stage, thus negating itself.

However, if your one-off pic argument can be accepted, so can the one-off Ronnie '03 back double biceps pic  :)

My argument isn't grainy and never was , learn how to follow the bouncing ball , the argument is Dorian is better because he meets the criteria better. I don't care about grainy you do hence why you keep trying to tamper with pics to make Ronnie grainy and it's failed

I posted a lot of back double biceps shots of Dorian in this thread ( learn to follow the bouncing ball i.e pay attention ) color , black & white , I posted them all , post ANY pic you'd like it still can't touch Dorian in balance , proportion , density , dryness , size AND completeness

keep making Ronnie grainy  :D  ::)

he doesn't compare to this

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #232 on: April 12, 2011, 02:29:13 PM »
My argument isn't grainy and never was , learn how to follow the bouncing ball , the argument is Dorian is better because he meets the criteria better. I don't care about grainy you do hence why you keep trying to tamper with pics to make Ronnie grainy and it's failed

I posted a lot of back double biceps shots of Dorian in this thread ( learn to follow the bouncing ball i.e pay attention ) color , black & white , I posted them all , post ANY pic you'd like it still can't touch Dorian in balance , proportion , density , dryness , size AND completeness

keep making Ronnie grainy  :D  ::)

he doesn't compare to this

Dude follow the title of the thread, you're the one trolling and hijacking with old arguments.

I personally think the Ronnie pic would beat the Dorian pic, and you cannot guarantee a panel of modern judges would feel differently. Deal with it.

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #233 on: April 12, 2011, 02:36:29 PM »
This is Dorian in 1985 winning a novice show in Morecombe after 2 years training,i`d say his genetics were pretty good.

lol ,,this is after him training for few years on constant usage of aas and low doses gh,,this is VERY VERY AVERAGE GENETIC

hardness and desnsity only mean you hold less water!!!!!! it means you know your diuretic well,,  and it meas you are smart about your hormonal usage,, it also means you hold less water on your physiqe because you havent used much testosterona longest easter like today morons,,


genetics is AVERAGE AT BEST

gh15 approved
fallen angel

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #234 on: April 12, 2011, 02:37:36 PM »
My argument isn't grainy and never was , learn how to follow the bouncing ball , the argument is Dorian is better because he meets the criteria better. I don't care about grainy you do hence why you keep trying to tamper with pics to make Ronnie grainy and it's failed

I posted a lot of back double biceps shots of Dorian in this thread ( learn to follow the bouncing ball i.e pay attention ) color , black & white , I posted them all , post ANY pic you'd like it still can't touch Dorian in balance , proportion , density , dryness , size AND completeness

keep making Ronnie grainy  :D  ::)

he doesn't compare to this
Hulkster wont recover.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83803
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #235 on: April 12, 2011, 02:39:29 PM »
Dude follow the title of the thread, you're the one trolling and hijacking with old arguments.

I personally think the Ronnie pic would beat the Dorian pic, and you cannot guarantee a panel of modern judges would feel differently. Deal with it.

HAhahahahahaha meltdown you're the one tampering with pictures in some lame attempt at making Ronnie ' grainy ' hahahahah

Ronnie would be left for dead by Dorian in all poses and Ronnie knows it

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #236 on: April 12, 2011, 02:40:34 PM »
Go learn what genetics are has nothing to do with joint size or frame  ::) he was ' very average ' because nothing ' popped ' than your explanation on what constitutes great genetics  ::)  ::)

And if anyone else needs any verification on just how fucking stupid you are look no further than you now claiming Chris Cormier had average genetics LMFAO like I said either you're being 100% contrary or you really believe the shit you type either way you're a moron.

you are one of th emost sick ,,ill individuals to ever grace this board,,youre really really mentaly sick from your infatuation with bodybuilder pictures ,,from having tons of my pictures,,you are probbaly in all honesty a homo,,im not joking by the way ,,but what bother me is that like suckmuscle you are SICK in many many ways worse than worshiping me ,,

you need to go red bible another 400 times,,and then maybe maybe will learn something,,you realy really have no clue,,stop worshiping ,,dorian was a shadow ...of ron colman ,,he coudnt hold a candle to him at both best...its a fact ,,,dorian was an average genetic fella that responded tremendesly to hormones aka grew on them and hold little water to begin with but even on hormones ws willing to go to the extreme end that andreas was in inorder o get dry and crispy ,,dorian will pay the price its not his time yet but he wil pay it ,,you can ask him sometime if he will live to see 80.....see his answer

dorian was NOTHING more than average genetics with phenominal respond to hormones,,yes he was syemtric and proportion yes he had goo dframe but this is only some of genetic,,,HIS MUSCLE SHAPE SUCKED IN FEW BODY PARTS ,,HE HAD NO ARMS HE HAD NO ARMS HE HAD NO ARMS,,

MISHKO ARMS AND DORIAN ARMS VERY MUCH ONE IN THE SAME....dorian just responded to hormones better!

gh15 approved
fallen angel

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83803
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #237 on: April 12, 2011, 02:42:19 PM »
lol ,,this is after him training for few years on constant usage of aas and low doses gh,,this is VERY VERY AVERAGE GENETIC

hardness and desnsity only mean you hold less water!!!!!! it means you know your diuretic well,,  and it meas you are smart about your hormonal usage,, it also means you hold less water on your physiqe because you havent used much testosterona longest easter like today morons,,


genetics is AVERAGE AT BEST

gh15 approved


he's very average genetics because his muscles don't pop LMFAO

he's in the top 5 of all bodybuilder ever but he's very average genetics LMFAO

you fit right in with the rest of the idiots in this thread

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #238 on: April 12, 2011, 02:42:55 PM »
No, ability to retain mass whilst getting cut is definitely partly genetic. Ability to get dry is also partly genetic. Against a stage full of the top guys in the world all dehydrated to the max, on the same insane amounts of quality gear, he was noticeably the biggest and dryest. Great genetics in that respect. Also response to anabolics is a genetic predisposition.

Not the best aesthetic I could agree, but muscle tears etc can't really be blamed on genetics.

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #239 on: April 12, 2011, 02:43:26 PM »
Shape? his genetics sucked for shape? this guys genetics for shape suck I mean seriously you're perpetuating the myth that because Dorian didn't look like this guy his shape sucked WRONG it's apples vs oranges and just because you prefer apples doesn't mean oranges are just as good

and another overstatement on your behalf his arms always kind of sucked? at his best his biceps were good , his triceps and forearms are great and his side triceps pose ( which leads me back to shape ) is still of of the best in the business , YOU CAN NOT have a shot like this if it's lacking in shape and having arms that sucked

All the muscles are excellently shape to create the entire effect which is an outstanding side triceps shot

infnatile,,i can take the true adonis from this boarding,,and make him arm look 19 inch at 164 lb,,do you fuckin get it ,,i can take almost anyone here put them in mirror with good light in bathroom or stage with color and get them down in bodyfat to where they are truely 6 or 7% and make them looking perfect with perfect arm with good angle and good position for the pictures taken ,,

pictures re illusions,,dorian arms were nothing to write home about from bicep point of view,,very simiolar to mishkop very similar to jason very similar to haney,,NO FUCKIN BICEPT POP NO FUCKIN ICEP FRAKINESS ONLY MEAT AND EVEN THAT WAS NOT ENHANCED BY SEO LIKE HEATH TO LOOK BIG ENOUGH,,

gh15 approved
fallen angel

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83803
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #240 on: April 12, 2011, 02:44:28 PM »
you are one of th emost sick ,,ill individuals to ever grace this board,,youre really really mentaly sick from your infatuation with bodybuilder pictures ,,from having tons of my pictures,,you are probbaly in all honesty a homo,,im not joking by the way ,,but what bother me is that like suckmuscle you are SICK in many many ways worse than worshiping me ,,

you need to go red bible another 400 times,,and then maybe maybe will learn something,,you realy really have no clue,,stop worshiping ,,dorian was a shadow ...of ron colman ,,he coudnt hold a candle to him at both best...its a fact ,,,dorian was an average genetic fella that responded tremendesly to hormones aka grew on them and hold little water to begin with but even on hormones ws willing to go to the extreme end that andreas was in inorder o get dry and crispy ,,dorian will pay the price its not his time yet but he wil pay it ,,you can ask him sometime if he will live to see 80.....see his answer

dorian was NOTHING more than average genetics with phenominal respond to hormones,,yes he was syemtric and proportion yes he had goo dframe but this is only some of genetic,,,HIS MUSCLE SHAPE SUCKED IN FEW BODY PARTS ,,HE HAD NO ARMS HE HAD NO ARMS HE HAD NO ARMS,,

MISHKO ARMS AND DORIAN ARMS VERY MUCH ONE IN THE SAME....dorian just responded to hormones better!

gh15 approved

No arms right  ;D

same arms as Milos right  ;D

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #241 on: April 12, 2011, 02:45:25 PM »
he's very average genetics because his muscles don't pop LMFAO

he's in the top 5 of all bodybuilder ever but he's very average genetics LMFAO

you fit right in with the rest of the idiots in this thread

so what ,,levrone is best 10 bodybuild ever with out wiingin o ,,sean ray top 10 bodybuild ever with out wiinin o and being a midgit...dex jackson top 6 bodybuild ever with having a ninja turtle belly and being  175-185lb bodybuild when starting pro...and not in sharp crazy condition

gh15 approved
fallen angel

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #242 on: April 12, 2011, 02:48:42 PM »
No arms right  ;D

you take picturds ,,,moments in time,,you try to find the bes tone,,but even this one show perfectly he got no bicep pop...its no freaky ,,its not fibery ,,its just meat that is not even hard enough inrealshion to other body part,,yes it is big....ofcourse it will be 19-20 inches otherwise he woudnt turn profesional in those days,,but this is not stage,,this is not nothing,,this is very good tricep with very average bicep if that...

his bicep didnt have the freakiness nor the fibrous nor the heads all crazy nor the high peak nor the crazy long thicknes of sergio,,not crazy ass size that make you forget about the lower quality ,,not the clear seperation like dex at his best....


he was top 5 not because of bicep ,,it was because of the BACKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK and because other body parts but NEVER THE BICEPS ask the fuckin fella


gh15 approved
fallen angel

MONSTER_TRICEPS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4255
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #243 on: April 12, 2011, 02:48:48 PM »
No arms right  ;D

In all seriousness... I cant see why guys like you and hulkster can't let it go. It seems impossible NOT to respond when someone critisizes your "favourite muscleman". You guys need some serious help. ;D

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83803
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #244 on: April 12, 2011, 02:50:40 PM »
In all seriousness... I cant see why guys like you and hulkster can't let it go. It seems impossible NOT to respond when someone critisizes your "favourite muscleman". You guys need some serious help. ;D

Men in thongz = serious buziness

Aerian

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1636
  • "Yumm yumm give me some"
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #245 on: April 12, 2011, 04:08:15 PM »
Men in thongz = serious buziness

As good as Dorian was (i do think he was one of the best) his arms just plain suck compared to other pros out there. Just look at guys like Phil Heath who granted dont have as impressive of an overall package but just in the arm department, TRUMP Dorian's.
Wait for it....

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83803
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #246 on: April 12, 2011, 04:11:08 PM »
As good as Dorian was (i do think he was one of the best) his arms just plain suck compared to other pros out there. Just look at guys like Phil Heath who granted dont have as impressive of an overall package but just in the arm department, TRUMP Dorian's.

You'll get no argument from me his arms weren't the best but at their best they were certainly good enough

the_swami

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1776
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #247 on: April 12, 2011, 05:10:51 PM »
dorian had outstandign back and calves but had may weak points

weak biceps
weak upper chest
flat delts
lack of quad sweep and of course the wide and blocky waist

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83803
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #248 on: April 12, 2011, 05:18:08 PM »
dorian had outstandign back and calves but had may weak points

weak biceps
weak upper chest
flat delts
lack of quad sweep and of course the wide and blocky waist


Weak upper chest?  ::)

FLAT DELTS?  ???  ::)

quad sweep wasn't that great , wide waist especially compared to 200 lb guys  ::)

First pic is his ' flat delts '

second pic is his ' weak upper chest '

Third the same

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: The best rear double biceps shot ever taken?
« Reply #249 on: April 12, 2011, 05:19:20 PM »
dorian had outstandign back and calves but had may weak points

weak biceps
weak upper chest
flat delts
lack of quad sweep and of course the wide and blocky waist

let's keep it real