Author Topic: Bin Laden dead.  (Read 43848 times)

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #400 on: May 04, 2011, 06:46:11 AM »
but but but I thought it was an unfounded CT to question Obama's initial fairy tale version of events?

Is it founded yet?  Can we now question whether the White House was just feeding us a perfect narrative to fit their own agenda?

I believe he's dead, but after the Paki information about informing the US that he's been there for 2 years and the revisiions/embellishments, the timing of all this, etc...I just don't believe he died the way they suggest.

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #401 on: May 04, 2011, 06:47:33 AM »
If they were watching this thing on a live feed - how the hell is thing so muddled? 

Who was watching? That story has been changed  as well, depending on who you are referring to.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #402 on: May 04, 2011, 07:48:19 AM »
If they were watching this thing on a live feed - how the hell is thing so muddled? 

Very good question. 

I just don't believe he died the way they suggest.

When I said that last night - tu and berzerker called it an unfounded CT.


This is the biggest individual kill by this govt since 1945.  You know they're going to sell it with as much gusto and glitter as possible.  They may have found him on the floor on his knees and executed him.  They may have found him dead.  Or maybe it happened just as they initially said.


Changing stories... our govt wouldn't do that.  Right, Tillman, Lynch, and a million others?

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #403 on: May 04, 2011, 09:49:11 AM »
Very good question. 

When I said that last night - tu and berzerker called it an unfounded CT.


This is the biggest individual kill by this govt since 1945.  You know they're going to sell it with as much gusto and glitter as possible.  They may have found him on the floor on his knees and executed him.  They may have found him dead.  Or maybe it happened just as they initially said.


Changing stories... our govt wouldn't do that.  Right, Tillman, Lynch, and a million others?

It is still unfounded... You have some other proof that something went down?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #404 on: May 04, 2011, 10:20:03 AM »
It is still unfounded... You have some other proof that something went down?

"Proof?"

Well, OBL's daughter is now saying he was captured, then executed in front of his family.

We can argue the credibility of her statement.  But at this point, we have official recounts of events which do not match "cowering behind a woman as a human shield and shot in eye" and "Armed, resisting, and shot".

So now there's 2 accounts from the white house alone, and another account from the scene.   Still unfounded?

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #405 on: May 04, 2011, 10:20:48 AM »
"Proof?"

Well, OBL's daughter is now saying he was captured, then executed in front of his family.

We can argue the credibility of her statement.  But at this point, we have official recounts of events which do not match "cowering behind a woman as a human shield and shot in eye" and "Armed, resisting, and shot".

So now there's 2 accounts from the white house alone, and another account from the scene.   Still unfounded?

Yes... still unfounded.


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #406 on: May 04, 2011, 10:22:25 AM »
Yes... still unfounded.

the US govt has released two official statements with differing accounts.  Not minor differences - pretty major in shooting an armed or unarmed person.

So you don't consider two official statements to be enough to determine 1 of the stories isn't correct?  :) :) :)

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #407 on: May 04, 2011, 10:23:41 AM »
the US govt has released two official statements with differing accounts.  Not minor differences - pretty major in shooting an armed or unarmed person.

So you don't consider two official statements to be enough to determine 1 of the stories isn't correct?  :) :) :)
I'm sure one is incorrect, but that certainly doesn't make some shit you pulled out of your ass correct.

The absence of evidence, is not the evidence of absence.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #408 on: May 04, 2011, 10:25:33 AM »
Most likely - SEALS busted in the room - saw OBL - and just capped his ass.   

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #409 on: May 04, 2011, 10:32:51 AM »
I'm sure one is incorrect, but that certainly doesn't make some shit you pulled out of your ass correct.

I listed a few diff possibilities. 

We already know the white house has destroyed their own initial reports of what happened.

So it's not offensive to our soldiers to say "that story smells like bullshit" when Obama is selling us a 2nd or 3rd version now, with little kids over there saying he surrended and was capped.

Which I'm fine with - he had it coming.  But why would Obama lie to us?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #410 on: May 04, 2011, 10:36:36 AM »
I'm all fo the hit squad... but i dont understand why the white house would make shit up, just to sell a rosier story.



BBC


The White House backtracks on Bin Laden
Mark Mardell | 06:51 UK time, Wednesday, 4 May 2011

The White House has had to correct its facts about the killing of Bin Laden, and for some that has diminished the glow of success that has surrounded all those involved in the operation.

Bin Laden wasn't armed when he was shot. It raises suspicions that this was indeed a deliberate shoot-to-kill operation.

Here are the inaccuracies in the first version. The woman killed was not his wife. No woman was used as a human shield. And he was not armed.

The president's press secretary Jay Carney suggested this was the result of trying to provide a great deal of information in a great deal of haste.

I can largely accept that. There is no mileage in misleading people and then correcting yourself. But the president's assistant national security advisor John Brennan had used the facts he was giving out to add a moral message - this was the sort of man Bin Laden was, cowering behind his wife, using her as a shield. Nice narrative. Not true. In fact, according to Carney this unarmed woman tried to attack the heavily armed Navy Seal. In another circumstance that might even be described as brave.

Jay Carney said that Bin Laden didn't have to have a gun to be resisting. He said there was a great deal of resistance in general and a highly volatile fire fight. The latest version says Bin Laden's wife charged at the US commando and was shot in the leg, but not killed. The two brothers, the couriers and owners of the compound, and a woman were killed on the ground floor of the main building. This version doesn't mention Bin Laden's son, who also died.

By this count only three men, at the most, were armed. I do wonder how much fight they could put up against two helicopters' worth of Navy Seals.

Does any of this matter? Well, getting the fact right is always important. You can't make a judgment without them. We all make mistakes, and journalists hate doing so because it makes people trust us less. For those involved an operation like this, time must go past in a confused and noisy instant, and they aren't taking notes. Confusion is very understandable. But you start to wonder how much the facts are being massaged now, to gloss over the less appealing parts of the operation.

And of course there is the suspicion that the US never wanted to take Bin Laden alive. Here at least many see a trial as inconvenient, awkward - a chance for terrorists to grandstand. Look at all the fuss about the trial of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

In the confusion of a raid it's hard to see how the Seals could be sure that Bin Laden wasn't armed, didn't have his finger on the trigger of a bomb, wasn't about to pull a nasty surprise. If he had his hands in the air shouting "don't shoot" he might have lived, but anything short of that seems to have ensured his death.

I suspect there will be more worry about this in Britain and Europe than in the US. That doesn't mean we are right or wrong. It is a cultural difference. We are less comfortable about frontier justice, less forgiving about even police shooting people who turn out to be unarmed, perhaps less inculcated with the Dirty Harry message that arresting villains is for wimps, and real justice grows from the barrel of a gun. Many in America won't be in the slightest bit bothered that a mass murderer got what was coming to him swiftly, whether he was trying to kill anyone in that instant or not.


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #411 on: May 04, 2011, 10:38:53 AM »
WWWTTTFFF is wrong with these idiots? 

Very simple - "He killed 3000 of our citizens - we were on a seek and destroy mission for him and whoever harbored and protected him"

End of story.   

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20517
  • loco like a fox
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #412 on: May 04, 2011, 10:39:05 AM »
The absence of evidence, is not the evidence of absence.

Man, when it comes to evidence you really go back and forth depending on what's convenient for you.  

You just posted on another board that the absence of texts mentioning Jesus Christ which were written during his lifetime is proof that Jesus never existed.   ::)

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #413 on: May 04, 2011, 10:39:16 AM »
I listed a few diff possibilities.  

We already know the white house has destroyed their own initial reports of what happened.

So it's not offensive to our soldiers to say "that story smells like bullshit" when Obama is selling us a 2nd or 3rd version now, with little kids over there saying he surrended and was capped.

Which I'm fine with - he had it coming.  But why would Obama lie to us?
We do?

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #414 on: May 04, 2011, 10:40:00 AM »
Man, when it comes to evidence you really go back and forth depending on what's convenient for you. 

You just posted on another board that the absence of texts mentioning Jesus Christ which were written during his lifetime proof that Jesus never existed.   ::)

There were no texts written in Jesus' lifetime... Find one.

But again... stick to the thread at hand... you really are on the Jesus kick man...

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20517
  • loco like a fox
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #415 on: May 04, 2011, 10:46:46 AM »
There were no texts written in Jesus' lifetime... Find one.

But again... stick to the thread at hand... you really are on the Jesus kick man...

So?  You just said "The absence of evidence, is not the evidence of absence."

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #416 on: May 04, 2011, 10:50:20 AM »
So?  You just said "The absence of evidence, is not the evidence of absence."

Yes... It was a quote from a TV show... so what?

The whole point behind "faith" is that you have to take it at face value... I get that you do... I'm not saying don't... You can have it all day long, I don't criticize it. I simply say that when it comes to the whole Jesus thing, I don't.

You will never have any "proof" of his existence beyond your belief that Bible is a historical telling, but we all know that the history in it is confusing and I can't know that one part is wrong but believe the rest... It's not in me.

Now, the Bin Laden thing... I believe that whatever happened will come out and that we will know exactly what happened. I don't believe it's some big conspiracy.

That's all there is to it.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #417 on: May 04, 2011, 10:53:23 AM »
WWWTTTFFF is wrong with these idiots? 

Very simple - "He killed 3000 of our citizens - we were on a seek and destroy mission for him and whoever harbored and protected him"

End of story.   


BUMP

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #418 on: May 04, 2011, 10:54:40 AM »
WWWTTTFFF is wrong with these idiots? 

Very simple - "He killed 3000 of our citizens - we were on a seek and destroy mission for him and whoever harbored and protected him"

End of story.   

He killed more people than that.

As someone posted on another thread.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osama_bin_Laden

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #419 on: May 04, 2011, 11:08:53 AM »

BUMP
I`m with you 100 percent.

Also, I`m sure the power was completely cut to Bin Laden`s house and flashbangs thrown into rooms.  Everyone was operating in complete darkness with night vision.  Bin Laden never knew what hit him.  Hopefully when they got to him, he was able to at least see the United States Flag on the arm of the soldiers before he was taken out. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #420 on: May 04, 2011, 11:10:50 AM »
I`m with you 100 percent.

Also, I`m sure the power was completely cut to Bin Laden`s house and flashbangs thrown into rooms.  Everyone was operating in complete darkness with night vision.  Bin Laden never knew what hit him.  Hopefully when they got to him, he was able to at least see the United States Flag on the arm of the soldiers before he was taken out. 


10000000%   -   on this - there is no GOP - Dem - Lib - consv - etc in my mind.

 

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20517
  • loco like a fox
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #421 on: May 04, 2011, 11:20:25 AM »
Yes... It was a quote from a TV show... so what?

The whole point behind "faith" is that you have to take it at face value... I get that you do... I'm not saying don't... You can have it all day long, I don't criticize it. I simply say that when it comes to the whole Jesus thing, I don't.

You will never have any "proof" of his existence beyond your belief that Bible is a historical telling, but we all know that the history in it is confusing and I can't know that one part is wrong but believe the rest... It's not in me.

Now, the Bin Laden thing... I believe that whatever happened will come out and that we will know exactly what happened. I don't believe it's some big conspiracy.

That's all there is to it.

Faith has nothing to do with this.  We are not talking about whether or not Jesus was the Son of God or anything like that.  We are talking about the historicity of Jesus, whether or not Jesus is a real person who lived in Israel in the 1st century.  You are claiming that Jesus is nothing but a myth.  



Scholarly response to the Jesus Myth Hypothesis:
 
"There are those who argue that Jesus is a figment of the Church's imagination, that there never was a Jesus at all. I have to say that I do not know any respectable critical scholar who says that any more."
Burridge, R & Gould, G, Jesus Now and Then, Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2004, p.34.
 
The classical historian Michael Grant writes:
"To sum up, modern critical methods fail to support the Christ myth theory. It has 'again and again been answered and annihilated by first rank scholars.' In recent years, 'no serious scholar has ventured to postulate the non historicity of Jesus' or at any rate very few, and they have not succeeded in disposing of the much stronger, indeed very abundant, evidence to the contrary."  
 
Michael Grant does not see the similarities between Christianity and pagan religions to be significant. Grant states that "Judaism was a milieu to which doctrines of the deaths and rebirths, of mythical gods seemed so entirely foreign that the emergence of such a fabrication from its midst is very hard to credit."
Grant, Michael (1995). Jesus: An Historian's Review of the Gospels. Scribner, 199. ISBN 978-0684818672 .

 
R.T. France points out that Christianity was actively opposed by both the Roman Empire and the Jewish authorities, and would have been utterly discredited if Jesus had been shown as a non-historical figure. He argues that there is evidence in Pliny, Josephus and other sources of the Roman and Jewish approaches at the time, and none of them involved this suggestion.
 
In response to Jesus-myth proponents who argue the lack of early non-Christian sources, or question their authenticity, R. T. France counters that "even the great histories of Tacitus have survived in only two manuscripts, which together contain scarcely half of what he is believed to have written, the rest is lost" and that the life of Jesus, from a Roman point of view, was not a major
event.
 
R.T France disagrees with the notion that the Apostle Paul did not speak of Jesus as a physical being. He argues that arguments from silence are unreliable and that there are several references to historical facts about Jesus's life in Paul's letters, such as that Jesus "who as to his earthly life was a descendant of David" (Romans 1:3, TNIV).
France, RT (1986). Evidence for Jesus (Jesus Library). Trafalgar Square Publishing, 19-20. ISBN 0340381728.  
 
Supporting a historical Jesus
Bovon, François (2006). The Last Days of Jesus, trans. Kristin Hennessy; Louisville: Westminster, John Knox. ISBN 0664230075.
  
Burridge, Richard A. (2006). Four Gospels, One Jesus? A Symbolic Reading, 2nd edn., Grand Rapids:Eerdmans. ISBN 0802829805 .
  
Charlesworth, James H. (ed.) (2006). Jesus and Archaeology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. ISBN 080284880X.  
 
Grant, Michael [1977] (1999). Jesus. London: Phoenix. ISBN 0-75380-899-4.  

Komoszewski, J. Ed ; et al (2006). Reinventing Jesus. Kregel Publications. ISBN 082542982X.  

Meier, John P. A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus, 3 vols., New York: Doubleday.  
(1991) The Roots of the Problem and the Person. ISBN 0-385-26425-9 .
 
(1994) Mentor, Message, and Miracles. ISBN 0-385-46992-6 .  

(2001) Companions and Competitors. ISBN 0-385-46993-4 .  

Sanders, E. P. (1993). The Historical Figure of Jesus. London: Allen Lane. ISBN 0-7139-9059-7.  

Theissen, Gerd; and Annette Merz (1998). The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide , trans. John Bowden, Minneapolis: Fortress Press. ISBN 0-8006-3123-4.  

Wright, NT (1996). The New Testament and the People of God. Augsburg Fortress Publishers. ISBN 0800626818.  

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #422 on: May 04, 2011, 11:27:21 AM »
Faith has nothing to do with this.  We are not talking about whether or not Jesus was the Son of God or anything like that.  We are talking about the historicity of Jesus, whether or not Jesus is a real person who lived in Israel in the 1st century.  You are claiming that Jesus is nothing but a myth. 

It is my right to do so.

Look... I get why a lot of people believe he existed... I do... But for me... A dude does amazing things for 3 years, but no one writes anything about it while he's alive? Nothing?

He doesn't write anything, no one writes jack while he's alive, but yet I'm supposed to take it at face value because he's in this book that people hold sacred that he must have existed?

I suppose you could say he was just some regular guy who was nothing special, but then why write about him at all?

Doesn't work for me dude.

garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #423 on: May 04, 2011, 11:39:16 AM »
Osama may be dead but his legend lives on in his 'Love Me Tender' Jeans.
G

loco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20517
  • loco like a fox
Re: Bin Laden dead.
« Reply #424 on: May 04, 2011, 11:42:00 AM »
I suppose you could say he was just some regular guy who was nothing special, but then why write about him at all?

You can deny Jesus' deity if you want to, but scholars know that a guy named Jesus who was called The Christ did exist in the 1st century.

A regular guy who was nothing special?  A guy who started the largest and most influential faith, Christianity, in the history of the world?  Christianity, the Eastern faith that shaped Western culture?