« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: IFBB 202lbs will become IFBB 212lbs and under  (Read 4579 times)

Reeves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: IFBB 202lbs will become IFBB 212lbs and under
« Reply #25 on: May 11, 2011, 04:15:27 PM »
Quote from: Meso_z on May 11, 2011, 01:02:42 AM
Seems that those fucktards cant control their drug use well enough to drop in the 202 class.

We have a winner!  ;D
Logged

Ex Coelis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8075
Re: IFBB 202lbs will become IFBB 212lbs and under
« Reply #26 on: May 11, 2011, 05:21:11 PM »
...
Logged

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19936
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: IFBB 202lbs will become IFBB 212lbs and under
« Reply #27 on: May 12, 2011, 05:59:27 AM »
Quote from: The Abdominal Snoman on May 11, 2011, 03:58:39 PM
Will Dexter lose some weight and bring it down a notch?
He won't have to lose much, the lying dwarf...
Logged

littleguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4183
202 now 212
« Reply #28 on: May 15, 2011, 07:24:16 AM »
See attached....

Could we see Hide involved as I think he competes at 215-220...
Logged

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #29 on: May 15, 2011, 07:34:23 AM »
They should make the 2 classes height-based instead of weight-based, so the guys can get as big as they can without having a limit to stay under.
Logged

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #30 on: May 15, 2011, 07:39:40 AM »
Quote from: kiwiol on May 15, 2011, 07:34:23 AM
They should make the 2 classes height-based instead of weight-based, so the guys can get as big as they can without having a limit to stay under.

Which would make no sense whatsoever, as the amateurs are based on weight classes....and the fact that height doesnt seem to be the issue...most of the guys arent that tall anyway.

The disadvantage is when youre giving up 50-75 lbs. of muscle...
Logged

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #31 on: May 15, 2011, 07:52:43 AM »
Quote from: Chick on May 15, 2011, 07:39:40 AM
Which would make no sense whatsoever, as the amateurs are based on weight classes

I meant including the amateur division, like under and over 5'6", for example. Only because if someone hits the 202 or 212 lb mark, they have to stay at that weight and can't get bigger, unless they want to end up in the other class.

Logged

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #32 on: May 15, 2011, 07:56:46 AM »
Quote from: Chick on May 15, 2011, 07:39:40 AM
The disadvantage is when youre giving up 50-75 lbs. of muscle...

Which has kinda something to do with height.  ::)
Logged

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #33 on: May 15, 2011, 07:56:56 AM »
Quote from: kiwiol on May 15, 2011, 07:52:43 AM
I meant including the amateur division too, like under and over 5'6", for example. Only because if someone hits the 202 or 212 lb mark, they have to stay at that weight and can't get bigger, unless they want to end up in the other class.



Some guys shouldnt get bigger...ruins their physique.  

Other guys like Branch is living proof that he had the ability to put on muscle, and has been 2nd in the World and just won the Arnold....at a whopping 5'6
Logged

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #34 on: May 15, 2011, 07:58:58 AM »
Quote from: Chick on May 15, 2011, 07:56:56 AM
Some guys shouldnt get bigger...ruins their physique.  

Other guys like Branch is living proof that he had the ability to put on muscle, and has been 2nd in the World and just won the Arnold....at a whopping 5'6

Branch looks like shit.

But you are right, some people shouldn't get bigger. Better refine your physique than blow up like the marshmallow man.
Logged
糞

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #35 on: May 15, 2011, 07:59:25 AM »
Quote from: #1 Klaus fan on May 15, 2011, 07:56:46 AM
Which has kinda something to do with height.  ::)

More like genetics...there are many shorter BBers who have done well at the highest level...as my above post would attest.

MOST of the shorter guys CANT put on that much muscle, as their structure and frame will not allow...at least not looking good.  Taller guys have a bigger base to build on....
Logged

maxer

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 151
  • authentic
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #36 on: May 15, 2011, 08:06:52 AM »
great idea to move the weight up to 212, i am excited to see this class take shape
Logged

littleguns

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4183
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #37 on: May 15, 2011, 01:39:09 PM »
Bob, did you have any say in this?

Was this changed with the thoughts that Correa and perhaps English would no longer be in the division?
Logged

Flexb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2975
  • word
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #38 on: May 15, 2011, 03:37:39 PM »
Quote from: Chick on May 15, 2011, 07:56:56 AM
Some guys shouldnt get bigger...ruins their physique.  

Other guys like Branch is living proof that he had the ability to put on muscle, and has been 2nd in the World and just won the Arnold....at a whopping 5'6

That's more of a testament to how far bodybuilding has declined.
Logged

Reeves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #39 on: May 15, 2011, 03:55:00 PM »
Quote from: Chick on May 15, 2011, 07:39:40 AM
Which would make no sense whatsoever, as the amateurs are based on weight classes....and the fact that height doesnt seem to be the issue...most of the guys arent that tall anyway.

The disadvantage is when youre giving up 50-75 lbs. of muscle...

Perhaps the ultimate disadvantage comes when you give up a kidney.  Or 50 or so years of your life. Nothing personal, just an astute observation by one willing to make it and eloquently so.

FTN.
Logged

HTexan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20031
  • Heath must lose!!
Re: 202 now 212
« Reply #40 on: May 15, 2011, 04:02:17 PM »
Quote from: Chick on May 15, 2011, 07:39:40 AM
Which would make no sense whatsoever, as the amateurs are based on weight classes....and the fact that height doesnt seem to be the issue...most of the guys arent that tall anyway.

The disadvantage is when youre giving up 50-75 lbs. of muscle...
yup
Logged
A
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »