You want to sit here and go over a person's typing skills ... check yourself ... slick. The word you were going for there was "can."
And, obviously polls aren't exact science ... just basic indicators.
All the indicators are pointing to the fact that the man in your avatar is a complete and utter failure.
Take away Bin Laden being killed and Obama hasn't done sh*t.
One-term president for sure.
I always appreciate it when someone corrects a typo of mine.

I come from a family of educators and I am a stickler for that type of thing. So thanks. And "Slick" doesn't apply to me, so stop trying to copy my lingo, fag
got.

You are right...polls are not an exact science. They are also not even basic indicators if we do not know the parameters of how the question was asked, the number of participants, the ethnic and/or socio-economic makeup of the participants, etc.
All indicators from the pieces of shit you get your information from indicate that Obama is a failure, sure. I can site many who consider him a success. Unless you have a crystal ball, you don't know jack about what is going to happen in 2012. And if all the repubes have is that shitty group of candidates you've fielded thus far, you're looking at four more years of OBAMA, baby.
