Author Topic: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show  (Read 9821 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
A little loose with the facts here.  It's a great story that his parents were castro exiles.  It's just not true, though.




During his rise to political prominence, Sen. Marco Rubio frequently repeated a compelling version of his family’s history that had special resonance in South Florida. He was the “son of exiles,” he told audiences, Cuban Americans forced off their beloved island after “a thug,” Fidel Castro, took power.

But a review of documents — including naturalization papers and other official records — reveals that the Florida Republican’s account embellishes the facts. The documents show that Rubio’s parents came to the United States and were admitted for permanent residence more than 2 1 / 2 years b efore Castro’s forces overthrew the Cuban government and took power on New Year’s Day 1959.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/marco-rubios-compelling-family-story-embellishes-facts-documents-show/2011/10/20/gIQAaVHD1L_story.html

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
His defense is now to blame his own parents for giving him a false story.

Wow. 

33, what do you think of this?  This "exile" angle was a huge part of his campaign.  Do you really think he ran and got into office without ever looking at the dates?  I mean, I was 16 when i did the math and fig'd out my parents got knocked up before getting married.  He's well into his 40s and he hasn't yet looked at the years of the biggest sotry he told a hundred times to get into office?


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Is this another example of a republican playing the victim?  Turns out not only did he lie - but he's still keeping that lie on his congressional website.  Also, not only did his parents live large and leave years before castro took over - but they also TRAVELED BACK to cuba regularly for business opportunities.

I guess they weren't victims of castro, as he claimed.  They were cashing in!


In 1971, Marco was born in Miami to Cuban-born parents who came to America following Fidel Castro's takeover.
http://rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/biography


They wanted the best of both worlds. When they couldn't have it, they chose the best option available.

They came to America BEFORE Castro took power too....and they went to Cuba AFTER Castro took power, as well.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/post/mar...

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19681
He was a phony from day one.  Even without the financial malfeasance the slime was dripping off Rubio.  I still can't believe he got elected.  And they are talking about him as a potential VP.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Exclusive: Rubio defends himself
By: Sen. Marco Rubio
October 21, 2011 01:15 PM EDT

The Washington Post on Friday accused me of seeking political advantage by embellishing the story of how my parents arrived in the United States.

That is an outrageous allegation that is not only incorrect, but an insult to the sacrifices my parents made to provide a better life for their children. They claim I did this because “being connected to the post-revolution exile community gives a politician cachet that could never be achieved by someone identified with the pre-Castro exodus, a group sometimes viewed with suspicion.”

If The Washington Post wants to criticize me for getting a few dates wrong, I accept that. But to call into question the central and defining event of my parents’ young lives – the fact that a brutal communist dictator took control of their homeland and they were never able to return – is something I will not tolerate.

My understanding of my parents’ journey has always been based on what they told me about events that took place more than 50 years ago — more than a decade before I was born. What they described was not a timeline, or specific dates.

They talked about their desire to find a better life, and the pain of being separated from the nation of their birth. What they described was the struggle they faced growing up, and their obsession with giving their children the chance to do the things they never could.

But the Post story misses the point completely. The real essence of my family’s story is not about the date my parents first entered the United States. Or whether they traveled back and forth between the two nations. Or even the date they left Fidel Castro’s Cuba forever and permanently settled here.

The essence of my family story is why they came to America in the first place; and why they had to stay.

I now know that they entered the U.S. legally on an immigration visa in May of 1956. Not, as some have said before, as part of some special privilege reserved only for Cubans. They came because they wanted to achieve things they could not achieve in their native land.

And they stayed because, after January 1959, the Cuba they knew disappeared. They wanted to go back — and in fact they did. Like many Cubans, they initially held out hope that Castro’s revolution would bring about positive change. So after 1959, they traveled back several times — to assess the prospect of returning home.

In February 1961, my mother took my older siblings to Cuba with the intention of moving back. My father was wrapping up family matters in Miami and was set to join them.

But after just a few weeks, it became clear that the change happening in Cuba was not for the better. It was communism. So in late March 1961, just weeks before the Bay of Pigs invasion, my mother and siblings left Cuba and my family settled permanently in the United States.

Soon after, Castro officially declared Cuba a Marxist state. My family has never been able to return.

I am the son of immigrants and exiles, raised by people who know all too well that you can lose your country. By people who know firsthand that America is a very special place.

My father spent the last 50 years of his life separated from the nation of his birth. Separated from his two brothers, who died in Cuba in the 1980s. Unable to show us where he played baseball as a boy. Where he met my mother. Unable to visit his parents’ grave.

My mother has spent the last 50 years separated from her native land as well. Unable to take us to her family’s farm, to her schools or to the notary office where she married my father.

A few years ago, using Google Earth, I attempted to take my parents back to Cuba. We found the rooftop of the house where my father was born. What I wouldn’t give to visit these places where my story really began, before I was born.

One day, when Cuba is free, I will. But I wish I could have done it with my parents.

The Post story misses the entire point about my family and why their story is relevant. People didn’t vote for me because they thought my parents came in 1961, or 1956, or any other year. Among others things, they voted for me because, as the son of immigrants, I know how special America really is. As the son of exiles, I know how much it hurts to lose your country.

Ultimately what The Post writes is not that important to me. I am the son of exiles. I inherited two generations of unfulfilled dreams. This is a story that needs no embellishing.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Share
385


PrintForward
Miami Herald: WaPost "Hit" on Rubio Manipulates Facts
by  Erick Erickson 10/21/2011
419
Comments
Manuel Roig-Franzia is a reporter for the Washington Post who once got punched by his 70 year old editor, Henry Allen, for writing “the second worst story [Allen had] seen in Style in 43 years.” That’s right, Roig-Franzia wrote a horrible piece in the Style section. His 70 year old editor did not like it. Roig-Franzia reportedly called his 70 year old editor and Marine a “c**ksucker”, and the Marine punched him.

Manuel Roig-Franzia has a well documented history of being an apologist for the Cuban communist regime and a hater of the Catholic church. He is also now writing a book on Marco Rubio.

We can get a sense of the book by his stunning hit job on Marco Rubio in the Washington Post.. Roig-Franzia claims Rubio has embellished his “compelling version of his family’s history that had special resonance in South Florida.” Again, keep in mind that Roig-Franzia is an apologist for the Cuban communist regime.

Roig-Franzia writes, “a review of documents — including naturalization papers and other official records — reveals that the Florida Republican’s account embellishes the facts. The documents show that Rubio’s parents came to the United States and were admitted for permanent residence more than 21 / 2 years before Castro’s forces overthrew the Cuban government and took power on New Year’s Day 1959.”

Now, there are two problems for Roig-Franzia. First, the communist apologist failed to actually quote Marco Rubio embellishing his story. The Miami Herald really destroys the piece.

The Washington Post just released this interesting story headlined “Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show.” The paper flagged a clear inaccuracy in his official Senate biography that states the Senator’s parents “came to America following Fidel Castro’s takeover.”

That’s false. Rubio’s parents came to the US before then, in 1956. They remained in the US after Castro took over in 1959. They returned to Cuba for brief stints early on, before the country devolved into Soviet-style totalitarianism.

But the top of the story suggests Rubio himself has given this “dramatatic account:” that “he was the son of exiles, he told audiences, Cuban Americans forced off their beloved island after ‘a thug,’ Fidel Castro, took power.”

However, the story doesn’t cite one speech where Rubio actually said that.

To back up the lead, the Washington Post excerpts from a 2006 address in the Florida House where Rubio said “in January of 1959 a thug named Fidel Castro took power in Cuba and countless Cubans were forced to flee… Today your children and grandchildren are the secretary of commerce of the United States and multiple members of Congress…and soon, even speaker of the Florida House.”

The catch: If you listen to the speech, Rubio isn’t just talking about those who specifically fled Cuba after Castro took power. He doesn’t say that his parents fled Cuba. Instead, he was talking about “a community of exiles.” That is: He was talking about all the Cubans who live in Mia

What’s more, Manuel Roig-Franzia does not say how he came to know these facts about Marco Rubio. But Gabriel Malor knows.

Rubio has been hounded since he rose to prominence by birthers intent on sabotaging any further rise he might have in politics. Malor notes, “Birthers intent on somehow proving that he’s not a “natural-born citizen” dug up his parents’ adjustment and naturalization paperwork. That’s where WaPo got the dates for his parents’ arrival to the United States.”

That’s right boys and girls. Manuel Roig-Franzia, who was once punched by a 70 year old for atrocious writing in a freaking style section, uses a Birther originated attack to discredit Marco Rubio and can’t even offer up a quote from Rubio.

And you know what? Even if he could offer up a quote, does it matter? How many of you know the full and accurate story of your parents and grandparents?

[This article was crossposted from RedState.com]







240 again spreading lies     

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
"However, the story doesn’t cite one speech where Rubio actually said that."


Correct.  He told the truth once about it in 2006. 
Then he told the victim, embellished story about 100 times after that.

Just because he told the truth ONCE about it, doesn't remove the fact that he lied about it all those other times ;)

The article's other criticism was that the WP didn't get Rubio's side of the story.  okay, dick move, but doesn't change the fact.


Rubio did use that story to get elected.  The fact that, in 2006 he actually told the truth, discredits his 2011 story that "my parents gave me bad info".  SO your articles completely PROVES that he knew he was lying everytime he told that story from 2006 til 2011.   Great work, 33.  You made rubio look even worse here.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Fucking please 240.    Seriously, you are a shadow of your former self.    I don't know what happened to you.   

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Fucking please 240.    Seriously, you are a shadow of your former self.    I don't know what happened to you.   

Nice personal attack.  I dont like rubio - I believe he exploited the struggles of actual cuban refugees, played that vicitm card - when the documents show his parents DID NOT flee castro.  They moved years before he showed up.  And, to make things worse, their "persecution' by castro included traveling BACK there to make money.

That sure doesn't jive with his story about them being exiles who fled castro.  And now we have YOUR document which shows he was lying yesterday when he said he only made the mistake because his parents told him the wrong story.  We see that in 2006, his own words admit he KNEW they were NOT exiles.  Then something happened in his mind - between 06 and 09 - which led him to change his story.  Maybe the whole wanting to get elected thing?

You're calling me names, but you won't address Rubio's lies.  His repeated  lies.  And proof you delivered showing it was no mistake.  He's told both the truth and lies in speeches.

James

  • Guest
Nice personal attack.  I dont like rubio - I believe he exploited the struggles of actual cuban refugees, played that vicitm card - when the documents show his parents DID NOT flee castro.  They moved years before he showed up.  And, to make things worse, their "persecution' by castro included traveling BACK there to make money.

That sure doesn't jive with his story about them being exiles who fled castro.  And now we have YOUR document which shows he was lying yesterday when he said he only made the mistake because his parents told him the wrong story.  We see that in 2006, his own words admit he KNEW they were NOT exiles.  Then something happened in his mind - between 06 and 09 - which led him to change his story.  Maybe the whole wanting to get elected thing?

You're calling me names, but you won't address Rubio's lies.  His repeated  lies.  And proof you delivered showing it was no mistake.  He's told both the truth and lies in speeches.

Were you equally as outraged when Obama said his Father served in WWII?

[/youtube]

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #10 on: October 22, 2011, 07:23:30 AM »
Nice personal attack.  I dont like rubio - I believe he exploited the struggles of actual cuban refugees, played that vicitm card - when the documents show his parents DID NOT flee castro.  They moved years before he showed up.  And, to make things worse, their "persecution' by castro included traveling BACK there to make money.

That sure doesn't jive with his story about them being exiles who fled castro.  And now we have YOUR document which shows he was lying yesterday when he said he only made the mistake because his parents told him the wrong story.  We see that in 2006, his own words admit he KNEW they were NOT exiles.  Then something happened in his mind - between 06 and 09 - which led him to change his story.  Maybe the whole wanting to get elected thing?

You're calling me names, but you won't address Rubio's lies.  His repeated  lies.  And proof you delivered showing it was no mistake.  He's told both the truth and lies in speeches.




Sometimes you thick bs is even too much to laugh at.   You are cherry picking meaningless shit here and you know it.   

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25843
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #11 on: October 22, 2011, 07:25:54 AM »
Were you equally as outraged when Obama said his Father served in WWII?

[/youtube]


Obama was talking about his grandfather who served in WW2, not his father
A

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #12 on: October 22, 2011, 07:27:52 AM »

Obama was talking about his grandfather who served in WW2, not his father



You mean that "typical white person" he was referring to?

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25843
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2011, 07:30:21 AM »


You mean that "typical white person" he was referring to?


The one that raised him since he was 10.  Its not uncommon for kids to call their grandparents their parents if they took care of them.  Don't drink so much Kool-Aid
A

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #14 on: October 22, 2011, 07:46:57 AM »
Were you equally as outraged when Obama said his Father served in WWII?

[/youtube]

Of course not. 120 had nothing to state when Obama lied about his uncle either. Obama didn't have an UNCLE that served in the U.S. Army and America did not liberate the Auschwitz death camp, the Russians did.  But, of course. Most of the media will attack the GOP for the exact same things that Democrats do on a regular basis.

In this case, Rubio didn't embellish anything and he is attacked for it. Obama clearly lied. Not only in this instance, but on many other topics, yet there was no attack piece or book written by the liberal media. How objective of you liberals.


James

  • Guest
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #15 on: October 22, 2011, 07:48:43 AM »
"Mr. Ayers is “a guy who lives in my neighborhood,” but “not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis." - Obama

James

  • Guest
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #16 on: October 22, 2011, 07:55:50 AM »
Obama promised to cut the Deficit in half.. ::)


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #17 on: October 22, 2011, 07:58:37 AM »
absolutely - obama was a stone cold fcking liar there about that WWii.... I thought he was also caught in a few other lies, embellishing his family's history.

However, I don't know that defending Rubio by saying "Obama did it too!'   makes it okay.

I thought repubs like Rubio were the solution to problems like Obama.  All you've done is show that Rubio is practicing the same lying behaviors that Obama does.  You've put Rubio in Obama's class in terms of honor and abusing fmaily history for political gain.  Obama is worthless in this manner, and now we see Rubio is too.

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #18 on: October 22, 2011, 08:01:04 AM »
Where is 120's scrutiny when it comes to the Democratic party?

120, you know you are closet liberal. We have known that for over years now. Stop trying to present yourself as some objective political thinker.

James

  • Guest
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #19 on: October 22, 2011, 08:03:45 AM »

 :o   :o   :o


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #20 on: October 22, 2011, 08:04:32 AM »
Where is 120's scrutiny when it comes to the Democratic party?

120, you know you are closet liberal. We have known that for over years now. Stop trying to present yourself as some objective political thinker.

180 thinks he fooling everyone.   

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #21 on: October 22, 2011, 08:04:37 AM »
Where is 120's scrutiny when it comes to the Democratic party?

120, you know you are closet liberal. We have known that for over years now. Stop trying to present yourself as some objective political thinker.

ask me about any liberal.  Pelosi got rich off shady deals.  Reid is a horrible POS.  Obama is a liar.  Biden is a windbag.  
These are established facts.

however, the GOP chose people like rubio to FIX the problem.

When we hear that his primary story of overcoming turmoil, his ocnnection to the community, his inspiration for perserverance - is completely false?  And that he only started telling this false story in 2009, that he told the true story in 2006?

Well, it scoots Rubio right on over into that class of liars and worthless humps known as democrats.  Marco Rubio (D).  There you have it.  

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #22 on: October 22, 2011, 08:07:11 AM »
However, I don't know that defending Rubio by saying "Obama did it too!'   

This is not about Rubio. At least not my comments. My comment is about your lack of objectivity and fairness. You jump all over Rubio, but where were you when Obama lied about this and his association with Rev. Wright and Ayers and a lot more issues than those? Where? No where.

Rubio is defended by the lack of facts and proof by the writer of the Washington Post article that you posted.  That piece you put up doesn't prove anything since the writer can't provide a single speech where Rubio made such statement. And the speech used by the writer as evidence had nothing to do with his own family.


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #23 on: October 22, 2011, 08:07:24 AM »
Yes, more anti-Obama video will surely help to mask Rubio's intentional lies.

Rubio is in obama's class now.  They lie about their family's acomplishments to try to deliver some sort of credibility.  

Rubio = Obama.  

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Marco Rubio’s compelling family story embellishes facts, documents show
« Reply #24 on: October 22, 2011, 08:08:18 AM »
ask me about any liberal.  Pelosi got rich off shady deals.  Reid is a horrible POS.  Obama is a liar.  Biden is a windbag.  
These are established facts.

however, the GOP chose people like rubio to FIX the problem.

When we hear that his primary story of overcoming turmoil, his ocnnection to the community, his inspiration for perserverance - is completely false?  And that he only started telling this false story in 2009, that he told the true story in 2006?

Well, it scoots Rubio right on over into that class of liars and worthless humps known as democrats.  Marco Rubio (D).  There you have it.  


again - you cant stop lying can you?