Phil Heath vs Ronnie Coleman - Coleman wins!

[alnassak]

Phil is more complete bodybuilder to me than Ronnie and anyone else.  He got the calves, forearms and the tricpes that Ronnie lacked.  Ronnie does have a wider "watery" back but not as detailed and as dry as Phil's.

Moreover, Phil has the lines, shape, small and tight waistline too

Phil is the best Mr. Olympia ever ...

 

[Immortal_Technique]

Phil probably does have less flaws. But then someone like Lee Labrada or Bob Paris has even less flaws......

Ronnie wins arms and legs IMO, although Phil does have sick calves and forarms. He doesn't look as dense and thick overall though.

Ronnie's back in '98 was pretty dang dry. I think 98 or 2003 Ronnie would be pretty hard to beat. Phil's back isn't actually anywhere near as big he just nailed awesome condition this year and achieved great detail, but it's still not as complete as Ronnie's.

He's pretty damn close though and can't really argue he's not as good because of the calves etc, I just think Ronnie's more impressive in a few poses, and denser overall. Phil has the genes to be the best however. I like Kai's physique more as he has more detail and size and interestingness. But Phil has it all.

[seCrawler]

Phil has the genes to be the best however. But Phil has it all.

His skeletal structure is fucked, so how can he have the genes to be the best ever? Packing drug enhanced muscle around his structure isn't genetics, it's response and getting the quality stuff from Jay and Kerri Culter early in his career.  I can't think of another a pro, who got hooked up from day one like him, other than Shawn Ray. 

[mesmorph78]

Are you seriously comparing Phil to ronnie
Aside from calves and maybe abs ..
Ron is beats him EVERYWHERE
Size shape conditioning SIZE width symmetry genetics
Just every thing.... These threads are dumb

[Hulkster]

Phil's back does not surpass this.

nobody does.

even the rear lat spread shows the christmas tree. insane.

[YngiweRhoads]

coleman is twice as big as that little shrimp heath. im sick of people comparing the two.

THIS

[Hulkster]

It only seem to be so, because Phil is in better condition, he is dryer. Coleman has no cuts, he is kind of soft in these pictures. When you compare Phil in his all time best condition to Colemans semi-good condition, you are just fooling yourself.

true, ronnie peaked that year for the O. not the grand prix 99 shows

[seCrawler]

These threads are dumb

x2

[Tito24]

Phil is more complete bodybuilder to me than Ronnie and anyone else.  He got the calves, forearms and the tricpes that Ronnie lacked.  Ronnie does have a wider "watery" back but not as detailed and as dry as Phil's.

Moreover, Phil has the lines, shape, small and tight waistline too

Phil is the best Mr. Olympia ever ...

 

yourn idiot, i think even philsulin would admit hes a tiny little tit compared to big ron

[yates fan]

ronnie obviously wins hands down,i cant even believe i am arguing this,but you guys are comparing bodyparts,in the ifbb competitions it is how good you look in the compulsory poses,name one compulsory pose heath can beat ronnie in,there are none its that simple.

[G_Thang]

ronnie obviously wins hands down,i cant even believe i am arguing this,but you guys are comparing bodyparts,in the ifbb competitions it is how good you look in the compulsory poses,name one compulsory pose heath can beat ronnie in,there are none its that simple.

ab crunch.

[yates fan]

ab crunch,wtf is that not a madatory,abs/thighs is but ronnie wins that pose against heath.

[G_Thang]

ab crunch,wtf is that not a madatory,abs/thighs is but ronnie wins that pose against heath.