Let me explain to you how bodybuilding works Wiggs, sure it's nice to have "what if's" and it is cool to discuss scenerio's but here are some facts that would've made it impossible for Haney to have beat Yates, In 1990 Haney was trailing, that's right "behind" to Labrada and had the fight of his life, but nevertheless pulled it off, now in 91 it was close, can't remember the point spread but it was very close.
in 92 Yates had easily packed on 10 pound, although on paper only showed 2 pound gained, he was drier and far more striated from top to bottom and the Christmas tree had a gazziliion striations, ham-glutes where granite and improved on his upper chest and shoulders, so tell me Wiggs if it was a close call in the judges eye in 91, how can you claim a 91 Haney would have beaten a 92 Dorian When Dorian improved by at least 10%, common sense the judges would have favoured Yates for the simple fact that they where only a hair apart the year before, again we are discussing facts not opinions- could Haney beats Yates in 92 possibly( if he presented a new package) but you lose credibility when you say a 91 Haney would've beat a 92 Yates, not 1 judge on the Olympia panel would agree with you based on the facts I stated above
