Author Topic: Early entrance poll results (Read 2067 times)

MM2K · « **Reply #25 on:** January 03, 2012, 09:39:03 PM »

Dont be surprised if Romeny snags this form Santorum. The remaining precints supposedly lean Romney.

MCWAY · « **Reply #26 on:** January 03, 2012, 09:43:41 PM »

Quote from: MM2K on January 03, 2012, 09:39:03 PM

Dont be surprised if Romeny snags this form Santorum. The remaining precints supposedly lean Romney.

97% of the precincts have reported and Santorum is up by 62 votes.

MCWAY · « **Reply #27 on:** January 03, 2012, 09:49:46 PM »

Talk about RAZOR THIN!! Now, Santorum's up a mere 5 votes with 98% of the precints reporting.

MM2K · « **Reply #28 on:** January 03, 2012, 09:50:32 PM »

Told you.

MCWAY · « **Reply #29 on:** January 03, 2012, 09:51:41 PM »

Quote from: MM2K on January 03, 2012, 09:50:32 PM

Told you.

Well, it's 99% reporting and Santorum's lead has increased to 34 votes.

Sorry for the rapid edits; I'm using my DVR; so I've been a few minutes behind. Now, I'm looking at live footage.

BTW, aren't the delegates being distributed proportionally, as opposed to winner-take-all, this year?

Bindare_Dundat · « **Reply #30 on:** January 03, 2012, 09:56:59 PM »

Quote from: MCWAY on January 03, 2012, 09:51:41 PM

Well, it's 99% reporting and Santorum's lead has increased to 34 votes.

Sorry for the rapid edits; I'm using my DVR; so I've been a few minutes behind. Now, I'm looking at live footage.

BTW, aren't the delegates being distributed proportionally, as opposed to winner-take-all, this year?

yes.

MM2K · « **Reply #31 on:** January 03, 2012, 09:58:29 PM »

Quote from: MCWAY on January 03, 2012, 09:51:41 PM

Well, it's 99% reporting and Santorum's lead has increased to 34 votes.

Sorry for the rapid edits; I'm using my DVR; so I've been a few minutes behind. Now, I'm looking at live footage.

BTW, aren't the delegates being distributed proportionally, as opposed to winner-take-all, this year?

Yeah, it looks like Santorum is back up.

It is my understanding that the delegates are distributed proportionally this year, yes. So, Santorum will scrape out a win after campaiging as if he is running for governor of Iowa, and Romney almost beats him after spending little time in Iowa.

MCWAY · « **Reply #32 on:** January 03, 2012, 09:59:24 PM »

Quote from: Bindare_Dundat on January 03, 2012, 09:56:59 PM

yes.

If that's the case, then this is a HUGE deal for Santorum, whether he actually finishes first or not.

That would mean that the only one who hasn't gone to front-runner status is Huntsman.

MCWAY · « **Reply #33 on:** January 03, 2012, 10:02:23 PM »

Quote from: MM2K on January 03, 2012, 09:58:29 PM

Yeah, it looks like Santorum is back up.

It is my understanding that the delegates are distributed proportionally this year, yes. So, Santorum will scrape out a win after campaiging as if he is running for governor of Iowa, and Romney almost beats him after spending little time in Iowa.

But Santorum has been in the single digits for Lord knows how long. Other than Huntsman, Santorum has been an afterthought. Now he pulls this off in Iowa. The question is how much longer before he gets skewered ala Bachmann, Perry, Cain, Gingrich, and Paul.

MCWAY · « **Reply #34 on:** January 03, 2012, 10:08:57 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on January 03, 2012, 08:41:47 PM

the threats occured in the media leading up to tonight. even with a GOP strategist saying this comes from the top. Basically saying that if Paul wins Iowa won't keep it's stance as first and they made sure to mention the revenues they would lose in that case.

If it ain't winner-take-all, what difference does it make, should Paul win Iowa (which apparently he will NOT), if he gets KILLED everywhere else?

Edit - Santorum's lead is now a mere 18 votes.

Primemuscle · « **Reply #35 on:** January 03, 2012, 10:10:56 PM »

Quote from: 333386 on January 03, 2012, 07:27:27 PM

Yes. Both parties are dog shitte

Nice to know we can agree on something.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #36 on:** January 03, 2012, 10:15:49 PM »

Quote from: MCWAY on January 03, 2012, 10:08:57 PM

If it ain't winner-take-all, what difference does it make, should Paul win Iowa (which apparently he will NOT), if he gets KILLED everywhere else?

Edit - Santorum's lead is now a mere 18 votes.

Santorum won, 100% reporting.

I didn't say anything about Paul. I was talking only of the rather unethical means the GOP employed. No party should pull that shit with anyone. Like I said, if I did the same thing, it would probably land me in jail.

Don't vote for X candidate or else is not right.

MCWAY · « **Reply #37 on:** January 03, 2012, 10:18:41 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on January 03, 2012, 10:15:49 PM

Santorum won, 100% reporting.

I didn't say anything about Paul. I was talking only of the rather unethical means the GOP employed. No party should pull that shit with anyone. Like I said, if I did the same thing, it would probably land me in jail.

Don't vote for X candidate or else is not right.

What's the margin? I'm watching it on Fox and they still have it at 99%, with Santorum up by 18. CNN has the same thing.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #38 on:** January 03, 2012, 10:24:51 PM »

Quote from: MCWAY on January 03, 2012, 10:18:41 PM

What's the margin? I'm watching it on Fox and they still have it at 99%, with Santorum up by 18. CNN has the same thing.

AP has 100% reporting, doesn't say anything about a margin.

MCWAY · « **Reply #39 on:** January 03, 2012, 10:48:30 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on January 03, 2012, 10:24:51 PM

AP has 100% reporting, doesn't say anything about a margin.

Fox has Santorum up by 4.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #40 on:** January 03, 2012, 11:00:06 PM »

Quote from: MCWAY on January 03, 2012, 10:48:30 PM

Fox has Santorum up by 4.

Not my fault, AP actually did show 100% They're probably doing a little recounting so they don't have to look like total idiots choosing Santorum.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #41 on:** January 03, 2012, 11:15:00 PM »

Now AP moved it back to 99% reporting... lol... idiots...

MCWAY · « **Reply #42 on:** January 03, 2012, 11:15:35 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on January 03, 2012, 11:15:00 PM

Now AP moved it back to 99% reporting... lol... idiots...

Fox just reported that some "GOP Source" has Romney winning by 14.

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #43 on:** January 03, 2012, 11:20:12 PM »

Quote from: MCWAY on January 03, 2012, 11:15:35 PM

Fox just reported that some "GOP Source" has Romney winning by 14.

Wonder if we can get another boo hoo family photo?

MCWAY · « **Reply #44 on:** January 03, 2012, 11:36:45 PM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on January 03, 2012, 11:20:12 PM

Wonder if we can get another boo hoo family photo?

The Iowa Republican Party Chairman, Matt Strawn, just declared Romney the winner.

Romney - 30,015; Santorum - 30,007.

But, each county has two weeks to send in the results to be certified.

Emmortal · « **Reply #45 on:** January 04, 2012, 12:46:35 AM »

Too close to call. Besides, Iowa has more often than not chosen the person who doesn't get the nomination.

Doesn't matter anyway, it's all decided for us.

loco · « **Reply #46 on:** January 04, 2012, 01:38:27 AM »

I'm disappointed Ron Paul did not win this one, but I'm shocked Santorum almost won...Santorum?

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #47 on:** January 04, 2012, 01:39:39 AM »

Quote from: Emmortal on January 04, 2012, 12:46:35 AM

it's all decided for us.

I just can't believe it would be so blatantly talked about. Openly admitting that the GOP will intentionally maneuver in the caucus to insure Ron Paul can't win. that's really fucked up. I think I liked it better when I had to come up with a conspiracy or try to make a case of fraud lol... Now they just admit it. They'll go with the candidate the people want as long as that choice is what the party wants, otherwise forget it lol...

Hugo Chavez · « **Reply #48 on:** January 04, 2012, 01:52:50 AM »

Quote from: loco on January 04, 2012, 01:38:27 AM

I'm disappointed Ron Paul did not win this one, but I'm shocked Santorum almost won...Santorum?

I know, WTF? Can you imagine Santorum as President? I mean the fucking dude has an issue with people using condoms? $:-\$ What the hell would he be like as president? He would probably appoint Pat Robertson as Attorney General and John Hagee for Secretary of Defense. Probably see people doing time for their stack of illegal Hustler magazines before this assclown finished his first term.

loco · « **Reply #49 on:** January 04, 2012, 02:22:37 AM »

Quote from: Hugo Chavez on January 04, 2012, 01:52:50 AM

I know, WTF? Can you imagine Santorum as President? I mean the fucking dude has an issue with people using condoms? $:-\$ What the hell would he be like as president? He would probably appoint Pat Robertson as Attorney General and John Hagee for Secretary of Defense. Probably see people doing time for their stack of illegal Hustler magazines before this assclown finished his first term.

LOL.

Santorum would not get the Latino vote. The Spanish word "Santurrón" which is pronounced like Santorum and spelled almost the same means hypocrite, self righteous prude.