Author Topic: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman (Read 34245 times)

Gab · « **Reply #25 on:** February 09, 2012, 09:58:21 AM »

Ronnie Coleman is the best bodybuilder of all time.
I cant understand how ppl think that Dorian looks better in any way.

Grape Ape · « **Reply #26 on:** February 09, 2012, 10:25:33 AM »

Quote from: Gab on February 09, 2012, 09:58:21 AM

Ronnie Coleman is the best bodybuilder of all time.
I cant understand how ppl think that Dorian looks better in any way.

The debate is not who looks better, it's how the IFBB judging criteria would be applied to them.

It's also about taking the worst photos of one and putting them next to the best of the other.

Oh, and name calling. Lots of name calling.

Anyway, looking at those gifs side by side you can see how Yates could, in theory, make coleman look soft during certain years.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #27 on:** February 09, 2012, 10:55:25 AM »

lmao, no contest. Ronnie > Dorian

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #28 on:** February 09, 2012, 10:59:58 AM »

Even Flex magazine says Ronnie has the better back

purenaturalstrength · « **Reply #29 on:** February 09, 2012, 11:01:14 AM »

yates has better calves

French · « **Reply #30 on:** February 09, 2012, 01:03:00 PM »

Coleman had no calves, zero hamstring and falling pecs ..

indeed Yates is much more complete with better density and conditioning

purenaturalstrength · « **Reply #31 on:** February 09, 2012, 01:09:54 PM »

Quote from: French on February 09, 2012, 01:03:00 PM

Coleman had no calves, zero hamstring and falling pecs ..

indeed Yates is much more complete with better density and conditioning

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #32 on:** February 09, 2012, 01:11:04 PM »

Quote from: purenaturalstrength on February 09, 2012, 11:01:14 AM

yates has better calves

X2...

Immortal_Technique · « **Reply #33 on:** February 09, 2012, 02:01:15 PM »

The left side of Yates' back is very impressive.

njflex · « **Reply #34 on:** February 09, 2012, 06:13:56 PM »

those b/w yates shots stand the test of time,,if he rolled on stage like that it could have been one of the greatest on stage builds ever,,,,

Hulkster · « **Reply #35 on:** February 09, 2012, 07:53:27 PM »

ronnie's zero hamstrings LOL

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #36 on:** February 09, 2012, 09:19:30 PM »

johnny1 · « **Reply #37 on:** February 10, 2012, 01:53:19 AM »

Quote from: purenaturalstrength on February 09, 2012, 11:01:14 AM

yates has better calves

Yip and better abs, Triceps, skeletal structure, back 50/50 ether way Yates the edge on Consistent Total back conditioning, Coleman Quad SIZE, Hamstrings debatable both had advantages in size or condition, Forearms Debatable 50/50, and both @ their peaks Yates for the all round balance IMO, Forget the fact that Coleman was Bigger the Conditioning factor would always IMO be the edge Yates would have on a prime Coleman, 1998 Coleman Vs Yates in 93 would be a Very close call a contest between the 2 @ their best would be alot closer than alot here think imo....Depends just what the hell the Judges are going for....Outrageous size, full blown muscle bellys etc, or the Complete Balance of the physique with unbelievable Conditioning

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #38 on:** February 10, 2012, 02:37:42 AM »

Tito24 · « **Reply #39 on:** February 10, 2012, 02:43:21 AM »

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #40 on:** February 10, 2012, 02:45:13 AM »

Bad Boy Dazza · « **Reply #41 on:** February 10, 2012, 02:47:36 AM »

KNOW not no

Quote from: Tito24 on February 10, 2012, 02:43:21 AM

Tito24 · « **Reply #42 on:** February 10, 2012, 02:48:59 AM »

oh really?? who gives a ratass retard

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #43 on:** February 10, 2012, 03:05:10 AM »

ARNIE1947 · « **Reply #44 on:** February 10, 2012, 03:27:29 AM »

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #45 on:** February 10, 2012, 05:44:52 AM »

Ronnie would destroy Dorian

wes · « **Reply #46 on:** February 10, 2012, 05:53:07 AM »

Deja fucking vu!!

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #47 on:** February 10, 2012, 10:30:10 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 10, 2012, 05:44:52 AM

Ronnie would destroy Dorian

That comparison proves the opposite.

purenaturalstrength · « **Reply #48 on:** February 10, 2012, 10:45:53 AM »

one should print out these comparison pics to actual size and put them upright against a wall to really appreciate the size difference

these pics are so small that it seems the difference is not very substantial

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #49 on:** February 10, 2012, 11:02:00 AM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2012, 10:30:10 AM

That comparison proves the opposite.

you realize Ronnie is bigger, more separated and striated, and doesn't have a torn biceps like Dorian?