« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8   Go Down

Author Topic: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman  (Read 34133 times)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #50 on: February 10, 2012, 12:22:05 PM »
Quote from: purenaturalstrength on February 10, 2012, 10:45:53 AM
one should print out these comparison pics to actual size and put them upright against a wall to really appreciate the size difference

these pics are so small that it seems the difference is not very substantial

I never thought of that. Good idea. Maybe someone will do it one day lol.
Logged

purenaturalstrength

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3975
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #51 on: February 10, 2012, 12:29:27 PM »
Quote from: Iceman1981 on February 10, 2012, 12:22:05 PM
I never thought of that. Good idea. Maybe someone will do it one day lol.

they do this in these weightloss programs, print out a fat persons full body pic in full size and put it on standing card board

then they lose 100lbs and are confronted with that print out

and they are shocked


we should get print outs like this and put dorian next to ronnie


my guess is ronnie will BLOW AWAY dorian
Logged

PJim

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3951
  • Strike another match, go start anew
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #52 on: February 10, 2012, 03:04:33 PM »
Quote from: Iceman1981 on February 10, 2012, 12:22:05 PM
I never thought of that. Good idea. Maybe someone will do it one day lol.

There is a more or less actual size cardboard cut out of Dorian's classic b & w front double biceps in his gym.
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #53 on: February 10, 2012, 03:05:07 PM »
 8)
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #54 on: February 10, 2012, 03:29:34 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on February 10, 2012, 03:05:07 PM
8)

Hulkster, I can't thank you enough for posting that comparison. The Shadow clearly blowing Moses out of the water.
Logged

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #55 on: February 10, 2012, 03:34:05 PM »
It makes me laugh how certain people on here think that winning the Olympia is all about size, size, size. Please get fucking educated about how contests are judged you stupid knob ends.
Logged

purenaturalstrength

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3975
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #56 on: February 10, 2012, 03:35:04 PM »
Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2012, 03:34:05 PM
It makes me laugh how certain people on here think that winning the Olympia is all about size, size, size. Please get fucking educated about how contests are judged you girls.

OH REALLY????????????????????????????????????????????????????????


IF THE OLYMPIA WASNT ABOUT SIZE DEXTER WOULD HAVE A DOZEN SANDOWS LINED UP IN HIS LIVING ROOM
Logged

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #57 on: February 10, 2012, 03:40:27 PM »
Quote from: purenaturalstrength on February 10, 2012, 03:35:04 PM
OH REALLY????????????????????????????????????????????????????????


IF THE OLYMPIA WASNT ABOUT SIZE DEXTER WOULD HAVE A DOZEN SANDOWS LINED UP IN HIS LIVING ROOM

Sorry, I forgot that Dexter Jackson has always been the most conditioned and perfectly balanced guy in all of his Olympia outings. ::)
Logged

purenaturalstrength

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3975
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #58 on: February 10, 2012, 03:41:36 PM »
Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2012, 03:40:27 PM
Sorry, I forgot that Dexter Jackson has always been the most conditioned and perfectly balanced guy in all of his Olympia outings. ::)

dexter was by far all of that yes
Logged

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #59 on: February 10, 2012, 03:42:58 PM »
Quote from: purenaturalstrength on February 10, 2012, 03:41:36 PM
dexter was by far all of that yes

I guess I must've missed that then.
Logged

BiGHer

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1414
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #60 on: February 10, 2012, 03:58:44 PM »
Ronnie is the greatest... of all time.  It's really not even a debate.  You will be lucky to see anyone close to him again in your lifetime.
Logged

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #61 on: February 10, 2012, 04:05:01 PM »
Quote from: BiGHer on February 10, 2012, 03:58:44 PM
Ronnie is the greatest... of all time.  It's really not even a debate.  You will be lucky to see anyone close to him again in your lifetime.

But he never beat the Shadow so how does that make him better? Explain that smart ass.
Logged

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #62 on: February 10, 2012, 04:07:46 PM »
Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2012, 04:05:01 PM
But he never beat the Shadow so how does that make him better? Explain that smart ass.

That's like saying Dorian never beat Larry Scott so how can you say Dorian's better?

Different eras.

Man you're dumb.
Logged

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #63 on: February 10, 2012, 04:53:22 PM »
Quote from: bigbobs on February 10, 2012, 04:07:46 PM
That's like saying Dorian never beat Larry Scott so how can you say Dorian's better?

Different eras.

Man you're dumb.

Different eras? By how many years?
Logged

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #64 on: February 10, 2012, 04:57:11 PM »
Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2012, 04:53:22 PM
Different eras? By how many years?

# of years is irrelevent.  Fact is they never competed against each other when Ronnie was even close to being his best.  I don't konw why I'm even typing this I'm sure you know that already.
Logged

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #65 on: February 10, 2012, 05:18:22 PM »
Quote from: bigbobs on February 10, 2012, 04:57:11 PM
# of years is irrelevent.  Fact is they never competed against each other when Ronnie was even close to being his best.  I don't konw why I'm even typing this I'm sure you know that already.

Are you talking about the era before Coleman developed man boobs?
Logged

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #66 on: February 10, 2012, 05:22:34 PM »
Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2012, 05:18:22 PM
Are you talking about the era before Coleman developed man boobs?

lol, i see you're just a troll now.  oh well, you reeled me in for a few replies but no more
Logged

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #67 on: February 10, 2012, 05:39:27 PM »
Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2012, 04:05:01 PM
But he never beat the Shadow so how does that make him better? Explain that smart ass.

Dorian never beat Haney. So according to your logic, Haney is better than Dorian according to the judging criteria ::)
Logged

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2493
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #68 on: February 10, 2012, 06:01:47 PM »
Everyone's still Blinded bye Coleman's size "factor" which apparently would "blow"... Yates away...Lol...Transportin g a off-season 312lbs Coleman in 2005 back to the Year 1993 to Blow away little 270lb-odd Yates with the same NEUTRAL LIGHTING, with the SAME BACKGROUND and with a Slightly shopped waist for the "Bigger guy"....Hmmmmm yip good call on the Size difference :-\ outrageous "Size" and Genetics alone would not Defeat a Condition Freak like Yates IMO, size DOESN'T mean Sweet fuck all UNLESS ALL THAT SIZE is Conditioned and BALANCED from head to toe... not just from the Knees on up.
Logged

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2493
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #69 on: February 10, 2012, 06:07:07 PM »
Forget the "Bigger Coleman"....This Version IMO is the ONLY Version that would have the BEST chance against Yates 50-50 ether way too close to call....1998 Coleman WAS ABSOLUTELY UNBELIEVABLE for the few that havnt seen coleman on Film that year @ the O.... :o :o :o :o
Logged

RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #70 on: February 10, 2012, 06:09:13 PM »
Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 10, 2012, 05:39:27 PM
Dorian never beat Haney. So according to your logic, Haney is better than Dorian according to the judging criteria ::)

He beat Haney in the muscularity round in his Olympia debut and some even feel he should've taken the title from Haney that year. When did Coleman come that close to beating Yates? He never came close once and when he did eventually win the O he barely beat Flex Wheeler. Pwned
Logged

nicorulez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
  • Getbig!
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #71 on: February 10, 2012, 06:45:56 PM »
Quote from: French on February 09, 2012, 01:03:00 PM
Coleman had no calves, zero hamstring and falling pecs ..

indeed Yates is much more complete with better density and conditioning



You are a complete idiot. Ronnie is much larger and has a better taper. Granted, Yates is harder but please. If hardness were all it took Munzer would have been Mr. O. Ronnie at his best was better.
Logged

nicorulez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
  • Getbig!
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #72 on: February 10, 2012, 06:51:21 PM »
Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2012, 04:05:01 PM
But he never beat the Shadow so how does that make him better? Explain that smart ass.

Dipshit, the Shadow lost to Momo (who was five foot tall BTW) and Haney. Are you saying that Yates in 1993 could never have beaten Haney. Ronnie came into his own later in life than Yates. BFD. The reality is that a all-time best Ronnie was the best bb who ever lived. Yates was the best conditioned, but his weak arms would have been toast against a Ronnie Coleman at his best.
Logged

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #73 on: February 10, 2012, 06:55:51 PM »
Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on February 10, 2012, 06:09:13 PM
He beat Haney in the muscularity round in his Olympia debut and some even feel he should've taken the title from Haney that year. When did Coleman come that close to beating Yates? He never came close once and when he did eventually win the O he barely beat Flex Wheeler. Pwned

Dorian never beat Haney. Thus, according to your logic, Haney > Dorian
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Yes Yates was smaller, but so much more impressive looking than Coleman
« Reply #74 on: February 10, 2012, 07:03:36 PM »
people always talk about ronnie's size giving him the advantage over dorian, but I disagree completely.

it wasn't his size.

it was the quality and shape/taper that gives him the advantage.

hell, at only 247 pounds, he looked like this, which would blow away dorian's heavier, bulkier 260 pound best:
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 8   Go Up
« previous next »