Author Topic: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars  (Read 2317 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2012, 10:40:18 AM »
2012 Federal Budget: Obama Proposes $1.33 Trillion In Deficits – Games The Administration Play



 The White House has released their proposal for the Federal Budget for 2012. Before we discuss the 2012 budget, harken back to President Obama saying in 2009 that he will CUT the deficit in half by the end of his first term. His first term ends in January 2013, so he has less than a year to accomplish his promise.

According to The Federal Reserve, these are the recent budget deficits. Obama needs to reduce the 2009 budget deficit by 50% to -$700,000 million by the end of 2012.



And here is a chart of the history of the budget deficit so you can see how utterly out of control Federal government spending has been since 2008.



The projected deficit for 2012 is forecast to be $1.33 trillion, 2.6% higher than the $1.296 trillion deficit in 2011 and 16% higher than the $1.15 trillion projection released by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) last week. This is a far cry from Obama’s promise of cutting the deficit by $700 billion. In fact, it is almost twice what he promised in the wrong direction. He is INCREASING the deficit.

The budget includes more than $350 billion in short-term measures for job growth; a six-year, $476 billion proposal for roads and other surface-transportation projects; and more than $360 billion in savings in health programs such as Medicare and Medicaid. Bear in mind that some of those savings are simply that Obamacare will cause private healthcare insurance premiums to skyrocket – see here).

The request also includes $850 million for Mr. Obama’s “Race to the Top” competition for education.

There are billions of dollars for loan guarantees, safety nets, education and infrastructure spending (bridges and bad roads need to be repaired).

Now for the bad part. The budget proposal repeats a call for $1.5 trillion in new revenue, mostly from ending Bush-era tax cuts for families earning more than $250,000 a year. So, if there are no new taxes, the budget deficit would be $1.33 trillion. With the tax increases, the budget deficit will be $575 billion in 2018.

What is stunning about this budget proposal is that the Obama Administration gets to “cutting the deficit in half” in 2018 rather than 2012.

And by the end of 2013, our debt to GDP ratio will be 110%. Our Federal debt since 2008 has been on an unsustainable trajectory and the deficit increase by President Obama’s is driving another nail in our fiscal coffin.

 

Well, we are beating Socialist France at the massive entitlement, spending and debt derby.

The most stunning revelation of the budget is the continuation of the massive spending binge without tackling the horrific entitlement problems looming on the horizon. Instead, the budget is loaded with the same green energy boondoggles, more funding to failed education systems, and infrastructure spending (roads and bridges). One a micro level, the budget is filled with appalling expenditures like a $1 billion dollar increase for tabulation of the Census, $325 million for Agriculture research, and other mind boggling expenditures.

Of course, the housing and mortgage fiasco receives some ink. However, the budget has a very optimistic forecast for the continued losses to the mortgage giants in conservatorship, Fannie Mae and Freddie. It forecasts that further losses to taxpayers will actually decline to $73 billion from the current loss to taxpayers of $131 billion. Only this Administration would brag about government sponsored enterprises losing “only $73 billion.”

But my biggest concern is the lack of discussion of the myriad of government mortgage refinance programs like HAMP, HARP, the Attorney General settlement (coordinated with the Administration) and the proposed FHA refi plan outlined in the President’s State of the Union address. These programs are likely to generate massive costs to taxpayers since mortgage refinancings are paid by mortgage-backed security (MBS) investors like The Fed, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, yet they receive little attention from The Administration.

Despite the pledges of reducing the deficit, the Administration is relying on their tired “tax the rich!” mantra to reduce the deficits, despite the fact that just less than 50% of taxpayers pay little or no Federal income taxes.

Given the Administration’s track record with Solyndra, the Chevy Volt and other fiscal debacles, I can easily see the massive increase in infrastructure spending going to the same green growth boondoggles that have plagued the Administration. Here is a sampling of the Administration’s green, big city redevelopment proposals:

“Improves public housing and revitalizes surrounding neighborhoods by providing $250 million to continue HUD’s transformative investments in high-poverty neighborhoods where distressed HUD-assisted public and privately owned housing is located.”

“Invests in sustainable, innovative communities by providing $150 million to create incentives for more communities to develop comprehensive housing and transportation plans that result in sustainable development, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, and increased transit-accessible housing.”

“Provides more than $2.5 billion to continue progress toward the Administration’s goal to end chronic homelessness and homelessness among veterans and families, implementing an innovative, multi-agency strategic plan.”

And so on. Hey, how about lowering taxes, reducing EPA iron hand tactics and various regulations hand-cuffing the economy and job growth? We know that would work, but it would take away from Big Government’s “Iron Hand” policies. After all, their economists know what is best for us. (NOT!)

We have spent trillions in the last two decades on helping home ownership and government-directed inner-city investments. Yet we still see little progress on this front.

In summary, this budget harkens back to the classic ’60s rock/country song by Joe South, Freddie Weller and others called “Games People Play.” Except that a new version should be recorded called “Games The Administration Play.” It would fit this budget proposal perfectly: its all games, not a serious effort to govern, balance the budget, reign in entitlement spending or reduce the deficit.

“Oh the games people The Administration play now
Every night and every day now
Never meaning what they say now
Never saying what they mean

And they wile away the hours
In their ivory towers (Cass Sunsteen, Austan Goolsbee, Larry Summers, Christina Romer, Elizabeth Warren, etc.)
Till they’re we’re covered up with flowers (cradle to grave entitlements)
In the back of a black limousine.

Chorus
La-da da da da da da da
La-da da da da da de
Talking ’bout you and me
And the games people The Administration play

Oh we make one another cry
Break a heart then we say goodbye
Cross our hearts and we hope to die
That the other was to blame (Congress and specifically House Republicans)

Neither one will give in
So we gaze at our eight by ten
Thinking ’bout the things that might have been
It’s a dirty rotten shame

Repeat Chorus

People walking up to you
Singing glory hallelulia
And they’re tryin to sock it to you (Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, EPA mandates, tax the “rich”, ignoring The Constitution)
In the name of the Lord (Jesus would want to raise taxes on the rich and give to the Romans – funny, I missed that part of The Bible!)

They’re gonna teach you how to meditate (or community organize)
Read your horoscope, cheat your faith (requiring Catholic organizations to fund contraceptives against their will)
And further more to hell with hate
Come on and get on board

Repeat Chorus

Look around tell me what you see
What’s happening to you and me
God grant me the serenity
To remember who I am (an individual, not part of a Utopian collective)

Cause you’ve given up your sanity (not to mention personal freedom)
For your pride and your vanity
Turns you sad on humanity
And you don’t give a da da da da da “

Hey, Joe South actually understood The Obama Administration back in the 1960s!

Here is Freddie Weller’s (former guitarist for Paul Revere and the Raiders) version of “Games People Play.” The real Paul Revere would likely approve of the update version.


George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2012, 09:08:12 PM »
Racist Post Reported.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2012, 07:16:13 AM »
Obama gambles on costly initiatives in new budget
51
 
EmailPrint

Initiatives include a multi-billion dollar commitment to build up community colleges. | AP Photo
Close
By DAVID ROGERS | 2/11/12 7:41 PM EST

From community colleges at home to the “Arab Spring” in the Mideast, President Barack Obama’s new budget shows a willingness to gamble on costly new initiatives, even after the sobering debt accords last summer.

The final details won’t be released until Monday, but Obama is expected to call for a major multibillion dollar commitment to build up community colleges as partners with industry in training a new generation of skilled manufacturing and technical workers. The three-year cost is pegged as high as $8 billion, and both the Education and Labor departments are slated to be part of the ambitious initiative.

Continue Reading
Text Size
-+reset Listen
Latest on POLITICO

Obama seeks return of the cool
Politicians mourn Whitney Houston
Obama gambles on costly initiatives
Romney wins CPAC, Maine
Caucus system under fire
Murdoch staffers arrested in Britain
At the same time, the president’s foreign aid request includes an entirely new $770 million account in 2013, described as the Middle East and North Africa Incentive Fund with the purpose of advancing democratic and economic reforms in the region after the turmoil of the past year.

The two initiatives come on top of the budget’s plan for an almost 50 percent, six-year increase in transportation spending, $231 billion of which would be financed not by gas taxes but war savings attributed to Obama pulling U.S. troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Conservatives are sure to challenge this assumption and have long argued that any such savings should go to reduce future deficit — not pay for new spending. Already Saturday, Republicans on the Senate Budget Committee had issued a critique, saying “the nation has long awaited the day that war costs would drop to reduce the deficit — not to provide a new source of funds for congressional big spenders.”

In the case of Obama’s community college initiative, it also will be funded outside the discretionary spending caps agreed to last summer and appears to build on the experience of a smaller $2 billion Labor Department program enacted in 2010 — almost as a footnote to health care reform.

The first $500 million in grants were just awarded last September, and Obama will speak Monday morning on his budget plans at Northern Virginia Community College which is part of a statewide consortium that shared in the first grants.

More broadly, the president’s worker training initiative dovetails with a larger manufacturing emphasis in his entire budget.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology, for example, is promised $860 million in 2013, a 13 percent increase with an emphasis on advanced manufacturing research. The same theme echoes in the National Science Foundation’s $7.373 million budget request, an increase of nearly 5 percent.

In his State of the Union address last month, Obama spoke of committing to training 2 million Americans with skills that will lead to jobs.

“You need to give more community colleges the resources they need to become community career centers,” he told Congress then. “Places that teach people skills that businesses are looking for right now, from data management to high-tech manufacturing.”

The increased federal support coincides with independent efforts by the industry-backed Manufacturing Institute, which has worked with the administration in some cases, Labor in some cases and has developed its own 16-week “Right Skills Now” training model accompanied with a national manufacturing certificate recognized by employers looking for workers.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2012, 07:18:23 AM »
Obama vows to cut huge deficit in half (2/22/2009. Blast to the past and another Obama lie)
Politico ^ | 2/22/2009 | By MIKE ALLEN
Posted on February 12, 2012 10:30:01 AM EST by tobyhill

President Obama will announce Monday that he plans to cut the nation’s projected annual deficit in half by the end of his first term, a senior administration official said Saturday.

The plan will make explicit what Obama officials have been suggesting for months: Contrary to his campaign promise, Obama will allow the Bush tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans expire as scheduled at the end of 2010 instead of seeking their repeal sooner. Officials determined that seeking to raise the taxes earlier during a recession was a bad idea, advisers said.

Obama, who will speak Monday to a Fiscal Responsibility Summit at the White House, also will outline steps he is taking to eliminate what his staff calls “accounting gimmicks” used by previous administrations.

“This budget actually is going to assume that there will be a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, flood or manmade disaster in the United States in fiscal year 2010, and each year going forward 10 years,” the official said. “The Bush budget never assumed that.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...










Lol!!!!    FAIL.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2012, 07:53:07 AM »
Obama vows to cut huge deficit in half (2/22/2009. Blast to the past and another Obama lie)
Politico ^ | 2/22/2009 | By MIKE ALLEN
Posted on February 12, 2012 10:30:01 AM EST by tobyhill

President Obama will announce Monday that he plans to cut the nation’s projected annual deficit in half by the end of his first term, a senior administration official said Saturday.

The plan will make explicit what Obama officials have been suggesting for months: Contrary to his campaign promise, Obama will allow the Bush tax cuts on the wealthiest Americans expire as scheduled at the end of 2010 instead of seeking their repeal sooner. Officials determined that seeking to raise the taxes earlier during a recession was a bad idea, advisers said.

Obama, who will speak Monday to a Fiscal Responsibility Summit at the White House, also will outline steps he is taking to eliminate what his staff calls “accounting gimmicks” used by previous administrations.

“This budget actually is going to assume that there will be a hurricane, tornado, earthquake, flood or manmade disaster in the United States in fiscal year 2010, and each year going forward 10 years,” the official said. “The Bush budget never assumed that.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...










Lol!!!!    FAIL.
Lol @ damage control -
1 trillion dollard deficit? Dont worry about it, Ill just tell the people that I promise to cut it in half, theyll buy it, I wont have to do shit.

Typical slick talking Obama, lots of words but will have NO follow through, ill put money right now that itll never happen.

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2012, 08:32:34 AM »
We can debate partisan positions and pick at the details but the main reason for us to vote this president out is because he and his administration will continue to expand the influence of government in most aspects of our live, put more things in control of an inefficient government and continue massive spending and debts indefinitely.  This is the open philosophy of big government liberals.  I'm a bigger picture guy and that is what I fear, particularly if given another 4 years and not having to run for re-election and appease independents.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2012, 08:35:06 AM »
The moron communist leftists are still in a love affair w Obama.   

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2012, 08:38:25 AM »
We can debate partisan positions and pick at the details but the main reason for us to vote this president out is because he and his administration will continue to expand the influence of government in most aspects of our live, put more things in control of an inefficient government and continue massive spending and debts indefinitely.  This is the open philosophy of big government liberals.  I'm a bigger picture guy and that is what I fear, particularly if given another 4 years and not having to run for re-election and appease independents.

This x100000
But it seems people are far to interested in playing the he said/she said party politics game, doing whatever the hell their party dictates because "my party will fix things their party will just fuck it up more".
Fail fucking people everywhere.

JBGRAY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2038
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2012, 08:54:01 AM »
The US spends approximately $10 Billion a DAY.  If you actually confiscated all of the wealth of the top US billionaires, you can run the government for just less than 2 weeks.  Even a 100% tax increase across the board will not even come close to closing the deficit.  Raising taxes on the rich is nothing more than "placating the proletariat" and will not solve any budget problems. 

The US needs to seriously re-evaluate what our role is overseas in terms of foreign aid and military adventures.  Federal employees as a whole are all GROSSLY overpaid.  Big bureaucracies, lawyers, contracts, and paperwork only serve to ramp up costs and expenditures of even the most simple of infrastructure improvements.  Safety nets for the poor as a whole should also be looked at to bring in something more practical and cost efficient.  Over 50% of Americans receive some sort of sustinence pay from the government and that is completely unnecessary.  Illegal immigration is not helping either, with hospitals and local municipalities having to shoulder crushing costs from fence jumpers.

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2012, 09:04:16 AM »
We can debate partisan positions and pick at the details but the main reason for us to vote this president out is because he and his administration will continue to expand the influence of government in most aspects of our live, put more things in control of an inefficient government and continue massive spending and debts indefinitely.  This is the open philosophy of big government liberals.  I'm a bigger picture guy and that is what I fear, particularly if given another 4 years and not having to run for re-election and appease independents.


Doesn't your point apply equally to the Republican presidential candidates, with one exception?

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2012, 09:05:59 AM »
The US spends approximately $10 Billion a DAY.  If you actually confiscated all of the wealth of the top US billionaires, you can run the government for just less than 2 weeks.  Even a 100% tax increase across the board will not even come close to closing the deficit.  Raising taxes on the rich is nothing more than "placating the proletariat" and will not solve any budget problems. 

The US needs to seriously re-evaluate what our role is overseas in terms of foreign aid and military adventures.  Federal employees as a whole are all GROSSLY overpaid.  Big bureaucracies, lawyers, contracts, and paperwork only serve to ramp up costs and expenditures of even the most simple of infrastructure improvements.  Safety nets for the poor as a whole should also be looked at to bring in something more practical and cost efficient.  Over 50% of Americans receive some sort of sustinence pay from the government and that is completely unnecessary.  Illegal immigration is not helping either, with hospitals and local municipalities having to shoulder crushing costs from fence jumpers.
Again - x100000
The answer isnt taking more from the citizens to pay for the government -
Its to scale back and fix the rediculous government presence and to cut back on expensive, outrageous programs and to cut back on the amount of money we feed to other countries when we dont have the money ourselves.
I dont understand why its so obvious but people just cant seem to grasp it - we dont have the money to spend all over the place. The people dont have the money to continue funding the government.
What do you do when you dont have the money to continue living a lifestyle? You cut back places where you dont need to spend money.
But the government just doesnt seem to want to do that, they want to continue spending money they dont have on worthless shit.
They dont even offer cutting programs, their answers are always taxes.
"How do we take more from people to pay for shit we dont need?"
Why the fuck cant they say -
"What things do we NOT need so that we can bring our spending down so that were living inside our means?"

JBGRAY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2038
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2012, 09:14:33 AM »
"What things do we NOT need so that we can bring our spending down so that were living inside our means?"

  Unfortunately, for every spending cut there is some lobbying group or even actual voters who will protest very loudly and influence the outcome to a different result.  Cuts can cost a politician an election as powerful lobbying groups will toss money towards an opponent during an election cycle.  I think politicians should look beyond being elected again and do what we voted for them to do.......not necessarily to impose the will of a majority, but to make smart decisions when it comes to being fiscally responsible.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2012, 10:49:39 AM »
  Unfortunately, for every spending cut there is some lobbying group or even actual voters who will protest very loudly and influence the outcome to a different result.  Cuts can cost a politician an election as powerful lobbying groups will toss money towards an opponent during an election cycle.  I think politicians should look beyond being elected again and do what we voted for them to do.......not necessarily to impose the will of a majority, but to make smart decisions when it comes to being fiscally responsible.
And therein lies the problem - small groups that can write policy by throwing money at politicians.
The fact.that groups can basically buy taxpayer money by effectively bribing politicians is fucked. Just plain fucked.

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2012, 11:45:21 AM »
There's more to it than campaign finance.

Look at the auto bailouts. Obama has an approval rating of over 50% in Michigan, despite the fact that the auto bailouts simply worsened the situation in Michigan. People are too dumb to realize, all they see is Obama favoring bailouts of their employer or their neighbor's employer and then they see Republicans opposing that, so they like Obama.

Or look at the steel tariffs Bush imposed. He knew that was a dumb economic policy, but he did it in order to gain favorability in a key swing state, Pennsylvania.

Or look at the sugar and ethanol tariffs. Another stupid economic policy that exists because it gains votes in swing states like Iowa.

Or look at FDR's strategy. His make-work projects were terrible economic policy, but they made the unemployed dependent upon government. He essentially bought votes using taxpayer money.

The core of the problem is unlimited government power.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2012, 01:10:49 PM »
There's more to it than campaign finance.

Look at the auto bailouts. Obama has an approval rating of over 50% in Michigan, despite the fact that the auto bailouts simply worsened the situation in Michigan. People are too dumb to realize, all they see is Obama favoring bailouts of their employer or their neighbor's employer and then they see Republicans opposing that, so they like Obama.

Or look at the steel tariffs Bush imposed. He knew that was a dumb economic policy, but he did it in order to gain favorability in a key swing state, Pennsylvania.

Or look at the sugar and ethanol tariffs. Another stupid economic policy that exists because it gains votes in swing states like Iowa.

Or look at FDR's strategy. His make-work projects were terrible economic policy, but they made the unemployed dependent upon government. He essentially bought votes using taxpayer money.

The core of the problem is unlimited government power.

Nothing will change as long as politicians gain power through learning how to manipulate people, and I have no better.ideas

I kind of liked the whole starship troopers idea, where you have to serve in the military in order to gain the right to be called a citizen and have the right to vote. And you aren't allowed to run for office unless you've served your country. I'm sure that would open up a whole other can of worms though. But it would sure cut back on the whole "voting because the gov promises.me free shit" idea.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #16 on: February 13, 2012, 08:36:08 AM »
Dem lawmaker: Obama budget is a 'nervous breakdown on paper'
The Hill ^




Dem lawmaker: Obama budget is a 'nervous breakdown on paper'

 By Meghashyam Mali - 02/13/12 08:18 AM ET



Congressional Black Caucus Chairman Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) expressed concern President Obama's budget would go too far to rein in government spending in the midst of an economic recovery, calling the forthcoming proposal a 'nervous breakdown on paper.'

"This budget is a nervous breakdown on paper," said Cleaver during an interview on CNN's Starting Point Monday morning. "We're still in a recession, we're still struggling. Unemployment is still too high," he said.

The Missouri lawmaker said he understood the need for Congress to rein in spending. "We do have a serious ailment as a nation and certainly as Congress," he said. "We suffer from 'spendicitis.'" But Cleaver said the president was not "the one who spread this disease" and had inherited those problems when he came to office.

While he praised Obama for attempting to tackle challenging fiscal issues, Cleaver feared GOP pressure "for the federal government to turn the spigot off completely" could push the nation "deeper" into economic turmoil.

The Obama administration will unveil their budget Monday morning. White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew on Sunday said the proposal would strike a balance between short-term stimulus and long-term deficit reduction goals. Lew, Obama's former budget director, said the budget would "build an economy that will last in the future."

But Republican leaders have already hammered early details of the proposal for tax revenue increases and for what they see as insufficient cuts to federal spending.

House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) accused the White House on Sunday of "failing ... to articulate how their upcoming budget would lift the crushing burden of debt and tackle our nation’s most pressing challenges."

"It's not going to be a pretty budget," said Cleaver who has been a past critic of President Obama’s efforts to reach agreements with congressional Republicans on spending fights.

Last August, Cleaver called the deal to raise the debt-ceiling a "sugar-coated Satan sandwich."

This time, he predicted though that the president's proposals would not get far. He foresaw "some differences over in the Senate," but added that the proposal would likely be "dead on arrival" in the Republican-controlled House.








LOL - can we offer these fools a one way ticket somewhere the hell else? 

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #17 on: February 13, 2012, 08:58:12 AM »
^ That Democratic lawmaker is a fool. When will people realize that economic prosperity doesn't come from how much money the government spends?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #18 on: February 13, 2012, 10:39:12 AM »
Debt Has Climbed $4.47T Since Obama Released First Budget—Calling for ‘A New Era
Cybercast News Service ^ | 2/13/12 | Terry Jeffrey




The federal debt has increased by $4.47 trillion since President Barack Obama released his first federal budget on Feb. 26, 2009. That budget was entitled, “A New Era of Responsibility.” On Feb. 26, 2009, as Obama released his budget for fiscal 2010, the national debt stood at $10.88 trillion (10,881,159,722,022.36). At the close of business on Feb. 9, 2012, the national debt stood at $15.36 trillion ($15,355,838,921,022.16). That represents an increase in the debt of $4.47 trillion ($4,474,679,198,999.80).


(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #20 on: February 13, 2012, 01:54:58 PM »
^ That Democratic lawmaker is a fool. When will people realize that economic prosperity doesn't come from how much money the government spends?
Right?!
How in the fuck does the government spending a bunch of money (Money they dont have and cant get to boot) on shit that doesnt do ANYTHING for people fix the economy?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #21 on: February 13, 2012, 02:08:05 PM »
Obama hikes subsidy to wealthy electric car buyers
The Daily Caller ^ | February 13,2012 | Neil Munro




The White House intends to boost government subsidies for wealthy buyers of the Chevy Volt and other new-technology vehicles — to $10,000 per buyer.

That mammoth subsidy would cost taxpayers $100 million each year if it is approved by Congress, presuming only 10,000 new-technology autos are sold each year.

But the administration wants to get 1 million new-tech autos on the road by 2015. The subsidy cost of that goal could reach $10 billion.

The planned giveaway will likely prompt populist protests from GOP legislators, but it will likely also will be welcomed by auto-industry workers in the critical swing state of Michigan.

That welcome is critical for President Barack Obama, who is touting his support for blue-collar manufacturing programs to help offset his low public approval ratings.

The new subsidy level represents a 33 percent jump from the current $7,500 government payout for each Volt buyer, even though the Volt’s buyers are already among the wealthiest Americans. It will be offered to buyers of any new-technology autos, including battery-powered autos and cars powered by natural gas, said a White House official.

The extra money for wealthy buyers will be borrowed funds, eventually paid off by future taxpayers in all income brackets.


(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #22 on: February 13, 2012, 02:10:06 PM »
 :)

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #23 on: February 13, 2012, 02:13:36 PM »
So, they officially announced the Obama budget today and it is officially horrible.  Kicks the can down the road completely on the national deficit and any entitlement or real tax reforms.  More spending, more government, higher taxes and much higher total national deficit in the next 10 yrs.  The spending reductions are against proposed increases and less deficit spending but more total deficit dollars.  Brilliant.
A real leader would have proposed tax reform...lowering rates, closing loopholes for millionaires & big corps and would have started tackling the real drivers of our unstained deficits...social security, medicare & medicaid.  He just wants to be re-elected.  We need a Reagan.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama Budget Deficit for 2012 - $1.33 Trillion Dollars
« Reply #24 on: February 13, 2012, 02:36:51 PM »
OBAMA: Let's Save Money By Making Coins With Cheaper Metals
Joe Weisenthal | 6 hours ago | 1,313 | 26


As a means of saving money, this is one of Obama's proposed cuts in his budget.

----

SAVINGS: INCREASED FLEXIBILITY FOR THE U.S. MINT IN COINAGE

Department of the Treasury

The Budget proposes to provide the Mint with greater flexibility in the material composition of coins to reduce its losses on some coins and the production costs associated with volatile metal prices. Additionally, the Budget increases the Mint's flexibility to match customer demand and supply by eliminating the provision requiring the Mint to produce Native American dollar coins in an amount equal to 20 percent of all dollar coins produced.
Justification

The Mint's primary cost driver is the price of metal, a factor over which it has no control. Daily spot prices of copper and zinc, the Mint's two main metallic materials, have fluctuated in excess of 400 percent, and the price of nickel by 500 percent over the past 10 years.1    This contributes to volatile and negative margins on both the penny and nickel: recently, the penny has cost approximately 2.4 cents, and the nickel approximately 11.2 cents to produce.2

Through its gains on the costs of producing other coins, the Mint annually returns hundreds of millions of dollars to the Treasury General Fund (GF) and is funded by the Mint Public Enterprise Fund. The gains from the dime, quarter, and dollar coin are used to offset the losses from the penny and the nickel, with the excess funds being transferred to GF. However, on December 13, 2011, citing inventories of 1.4 billion surplus dollar coins in Federal Reserve vaults, enough to meet current levels of circulating demand for more than a decade, the Secretary of the Treasury suspended production of the Presidential dollar coin as part of the Vice President's Campaign to Cut Waste. The suspended production of the Presidential dollar coin will reduce the amount of revenue available for the Mint to offset production costs of the penny and the nickel. Greater flexibility in the composition of coinage materials could enable the Mint to utilize less expensive metals in the minting process and substantially reduce its production costs. Using alternative coinage materials could save the Mint millions annually after a potential initial period of development and capital adjustments. Savings estimates will be available after the Mint concludes ongoing research on the most cost-effective materials.

The 2013 Budget would bring the costs of coins more in-line with their face values and create a more sustainable, cost-effective 21st Century use of materials in the minting process. The Budget enables the Department of the Treasury to explore, analyze, and approve new, less-expensive metals for all circulating coins based on factors that will result in the highest quality of coin production at the most cost-effective price. Such factors may include physical, chemical, metallurgical, and technical characteristics; material, fabrication, minting, and distribution costs; materials availability and sources of raw materials; durability; effects on sorting, handling, packaging and vending machines; and resistance to counterfeiting. The added flexibility the Budget proposes will improve the minting process and enable the Mint to mitigate the high, volatile costs of commodity metals.

Additionally, the Budget would remove the current law requirement that twenty percent of all dollar coins produced be of the Native American design. Numismatic quality dollar coins would remain available for purchase, but eliminating the twenty percent requirement would increase the Mint's flexibility to match the supply to consumer demand.

Citations
1 http://www.infomine.com/investment/metalprices/

2 http://news.coinupdate.com/cost-to-make-penny-and-nickel-rises-1139/



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/obama-lets-save-money-by-making-coins-with-cheaper-metals-2012-2#ixzz1mIv4DMwb