Because you can't back it up. I'm guessing you've got one, maybe two clips, probably of some head saying they don't see it happening or some such thing and you've decided to translate that into something stupid.
Now, as you've decided to make it plural - let's see the evidence of the GOP heads saying they "won't allow" RP to win.
Smart money says you've got some retarded interpretation that you want spin.
Let me guess already - Those not agreeing with your interpretation can't think for themselves, are sheeple, are blind, just don't want to see the truth. Yep, haven't heard these CT before - 
It was in an article posting by Howard, I believe.
Let me go find it.
I took it at face value. We'll leave it at GOP head then, single.
I may be wrong, but pretty sure it said "we will not allow him to win".
Look, you seem to want me to be some sort of Paultard Zealot (which, yes Im a bit of an alarmist and I do feel Paul is being treated extremely unfairly, considering hes the only one out there who has what it takes to get things back on track economically).
Im a realist - I dont see Paul winning the nomination, not due to CT, but due to lack of support. (Primarily IMHO due to media bias and lack of support from his party).
You, for some reason, seem extremely pissed off at anyone that feels that Paul is being pushed to the sidelines unfairly (of which there are literally dozens of examples supporting this) - or that the GOP establishment is extremely opposed to Paul winning and will do whatever it takes to ensure his loss.
I dont understand why you get so upset at the thought that the GOP is treating Paul unfairly, but yet again, here you are freaking out at the idea that theyre committed to his losing. Why does it piss you off so much to think that they will do whatever they can to make sure he doesnt win?
(Which, like I said before, they probably wont have to do anything illegal as the media alone pretty much has his loss assured.)
