Author Topic: Cop Tases handcuffed girl in back, now braindead! (Read 27618 times)

haider · « **Reply #175 on:** February 19, 2012, 09:14:36 PM »

I don't know about the inherent dangers of tazing someone, but what happened to the girl was not something the cop imagined/wanted ofcourse. I see it as excessive force considering she wasn't physically harming anyone- the least he could have done is warned her?

Mawse · « **Reply #176 on:** February 19, 2012, 09:48:38 PM »

The main point is a tazer isn't a compliance tool, it's supposed to be an alternative to deadly force.

so when these fat fucks taze people for minor violations it should be viewed as the equivalent of them drawing their weapon and firing at jaywalkers, drunks or mentally disturbed homeless people.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #177 on:** February 19, 2012, 10:00:59 PM »

Quote from: haider on February 19, 2012, 09:14:36 PM

I don't know about the inherent dangers of tazing someone, but what happened to the girl was not something the cop imagined/wanted ofcourse. I see it as excessive force considering she wasn't physically harming anyone- the least he could have done is warned her?

the woman was a threat to herself and others. Yes, the danger was perceived b/c she wasn't physically harming anyone. However, that's like arguing you shouldn't tase someone who is charging at you with a weapon b/c technically they aren't physically hurting you

tu_holmes · « **Reply #178 on:** February 20, 2012, 06:53:37 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 19, 2012, 10:00:59 PM

the woman was a threat to herself and others. Yes, the danger was perceived b/c she wasn't physically harming anyone. However, that's like arguing you shouldn't tase someone who is charging at you with a weapon b/c technically they aren't physically hurting you

That's silly.

If someone is charging you with a weapon that IS the definition of imminent danger.

Holy crap man. If someone is charging you with a baseball bat you have every right to shoot to kill.

See here's where there's a disconnect.

Reasonable people see imminent danger and irrational people do not apparently.

Agnostic007 · « **Reply #179 on:** February 20, 2012, 07:48:55 AM »

Quote from: 240 is Back on February 19, 2012, 04:43:38 AM

whole situation is bad, but if she had run into traffic and a busload of nuns would have crashed into a truck of baby seals, it would have been 'why didn't you stop her, officer'.

baby seals.... hehe

berblexer · « **Reply #180 on:** February 20, 2012, 09:04:47 AM »

This cop is a fat slob and incopetent, he should have his badge taken away at the least.

tommywishbone · « **Reply #181 on:** February 20, 2012, 10:11:02 AM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on February 19, 2012, 10:00:59 PM

the woman was a threat to herself and others. Yes, the danger was perceived b/c she wasn't physically harming anyone. However, that's like arguing you shouldn't tase someone who is charging at you with a weapon b/c technically they aren't physically hurting you

Wow, that's nice, they must have WiFi at the donut shop officer. You are truly defending your bloated cowardly coworker with enthusiasm. Keep up the good work.

viking1 · « **Reply #182 on:** February 20, 2012, 11:38:41 AM »

She was in custody and chose to run out of a police station cuffed. Some people are just shit magnets.. period. If you don't want to be a shit magnet, obey orders and don't run. If you choose to fuck off and run out of a station.... trying to escape custody, the officer/deputy has the right to shoot to kill.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #183 on:** February 20, 2012, 11:44:23 AM »

Quote from: viking1 on February 20, 2012, 11:38:41 AM

She was in custody and chose to run out of a police station cuffed. Some people are just shit magnets.. period. If you don't want to be a shit magnet, obey orders and don't run. If you choose to fuck off and run out of a station.... trying to escape custody, the officer/deputy has the right to shoot to kill.

Shoot to kill?!?

For running away handcuffed with no weapons. What. The. Fuck.

Dr Dutch · « **Reply #184 on:** February 20, 2012, 11:47:17 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 20, 2012, 11:44:23 AM

Shoot to kill?!?

He didn't shoot to kill...!

He shot to thrill...

[ Invalid YouTube link ]

Agnostic007 · « **Reply #185 on:** February 20, 2012, 11:53:03 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 20, 2012, 11:44:23 AM

Shoot to kill?!?

For running away handcuffed with no weapons. What. The. Fuck.

There are of course very limited times when an officer would be authorized to shoot a running handcuffed suspect. None of those conditions were present.

Mawse · « **Reply #186 on:** February 20, 2012, 11:59:39 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 20, 2012, 06:53:37 AM

That's silly.

If someone is charging you with a weapon that IS the definition of imminent danger.

Holy crap man. If someone is charging you with a baseball bat you have every right to shoot to kill.

See here's where there's a disconnect.

Reasonable people see imminent danger and irrational people do not apparently.

if it's an illegal, drunk mexican charging the LAPD with a knife (after stabbing a pregnant woman and other people) who gets shot then people riot on the streets in protest and cops are investigated at the taxpayers expense. But if a young girl is tazed in the back there's a few comments on youtube and the cop gets a raise.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #187 on:** February 20, 2012, 01:56:47 PM »

Quote from: Agnostic007 on February 20, 2012, 11:53:03 AM

There are of course very limited times when an officer would be authorized to shoot a running handcuffed suspect. None of those conditions were present.

I agree with this completely.

Where we differ is that you think it was ok to use a taser and I disagree in this instance.

I believe the taser is very close to using a gun and you see it otherwise.

wes · « **Reply #188 on:** February 20, 2012, 01:59:18 PM »

The fucking 100 pound kid was harmless..........PERIOD!!

Dr Dutch · « **Reply #189 on:** February 20, 2012, 02:07:35 PM »

That cop was fat. So no matter what he did it was wrong. Period.

tommywishbone · « **Reply #190 on:** February 20, 2012, 02:49:06 PM »

MikMaq · « **Reply #191 on:** February 20, 2012, 03:17:10 PM »

Newflash bitch already did 2 hit and runs(special note hit means CAUSE CAR ACCIDENT). The bitch gets what she deserves.

The odds of bashing her head in the ground are just as likely as the dumb bitch tripping and slamming her head into something. (i,e, dont run with cuffs).

The dumb bitch is a violent criminal, a 100 pound girl in a car, is way more dangerous than a getbigger on his animal pack roller blades FACT!.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #192 on:** February 20, 2012, 04:22:16 PM »

Quote from: MikMaq on February 20, 2012, 03:17:10 PM

Newflash bitch already did 2 hit and runs(special note hit means CAUSE CAR ACCIDENT). The bitch gets what she deserves.

The odds of bashing her head in the ground are just as likely as the dumb bitch tripping and slamming her head into something. (i,e, dont run with cuffs).

The dumb bitch is a violent criminal, a 100 pound girl in a car, is way more dangerous than a getbigger on his animal pack roller blades FACT!.

Yes because bumping into a car is equivalent to shooting someone with a gun.

MikMaq · « **Reply #193 on:** February 20, 2012, 04:38:08 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 20, 2012, 04:22:16 PM

Yes because bumping into a car is equivalent to shooting someone with a gun.

No doing it twice loosing your ability to drive, while staying on the road. Is far more intentional and aggressive, that tasing a bitch with cuffs.

tu_holmes · « **Reply #194 on:** February 20, 2012, 04:43:55 PM »

Quote from: MikMaq on February 20, 2012, 04:38:08 PM

No doing it twice loosing your ability to drive, while staying on the road. Is far more intentional and aggressive, that tasing a bitch with cuffs.

Do you understand imminent danger?

Aerian · « **Reply #195 on:** February 20, 2012, 04:47:16 PM »

Some of you are whining like bitches. She broke the law several times and then tried to run away from a police station while in handcuffs. If she didnt want anything bad to possibly happen she should have stayed put.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #196 on:** February 20, 2012, 08:03:10 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 20, 2012, 06:53:37 AM

That's silly.

If someone is charging you with a weapon that IS the definition of imminent danger.

Holy crap man. If someone is charging you with a baseball bat you have every right to shoot to kill.

way to miss the crux of my post. A perceived threat is still a perceived threat whether it be to themselves or others. The girl could have ran into oncoming traffic and been killed by a car or caused an automobile accident that resulted in the death of an innocent bystander.

Quote

See here's where there's a disconnect.

Reasonable people see imminent danger and irrational people do not apparently.

Reasonable people look at all the facts before reaching a conclusion.

Irrational people only look at some of the facts and have a knee-jerk reaction.

Agnostic007 · « **Reply #197 on:** February 20, 2012, 08:19:37 PM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 20, 2012, 01:56:47 PM

I agree with this completely.

Where we differ is that you think it was ok to use a taser and I disagree in this instance.

I believe the taser is very close to using a gun and you see it otherwise.

Of course, I have facts on my side. A Gun and a Taser are nowhere near the same thing. Next, you'd equate a night stick TJ. Hooker throws at a running bad guy the same as a gun if the bad guy tripped and hit his head... There is solid science behind me, you're opinion on your side... guess what.. I win

tu_holmes · « **Reply #198 on:** February 20, 2012, 10:04:08 PM »

Quote from: Agnostic007 on February 20, 2012, 08:19:37 PM

Of course, I have facts on my side. A Gun and a Taser are nowhere near the same thing. Next, you'd equate a night stick TJ. Hooker throws at a running bad guy the same as a gun if the bad guy tripped and hit his head... There is solid science behind me, you're opinion on your side... guess what.. I win

Please. Don't stretch the facts.

How much electricity is in a taser?

How much electricity can cause death?

Here's a hint. Tasers have caused death.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #199 on:** February 21, 2012, 07:02:59 AM »

Quote from: tu_holmes on February 20, 2012, 10:04:08 PM

Please. Don't stretch the facts.

How much electricity is in a taser?

How much electricity can cause death?

Here's a hint. Tasers have caused death.

how common are deaths related to tasers? Show me the statistics. While you're at it, show me the number of incidents of brain deaths related to tasers. If you're going to argue how dangerous they are, then you need to back it up with facts