Author Topic: How many years is considered CLEAN.  (Read 2604 times)

Steve Namat

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 3004
  • IFBB PRO www.stevenamat.com
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #25 on: February 20, 2012, 11:27:49 AM »
I know some natural BB associations require 5-7 years to be considered clean. What's Getbiggers opinions on this!
If ur clean. Ur clean. Fuckin simple.  ;D

Polish Power

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3315
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #26 on: February 20, 2012, 11:40:52 AM »
If you ever looked at a mans penis your gay. Fuckin simple

If ur clean. Ur clean. Fuckin simple.  ;D

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29938
  • Expunged
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #27 on: February 20, 2012, 12:04:01 PM »
You can never go back.

the trainer

  • Guest
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #28 on: February 20, 2012, 01:33:44 PM »
I only consider myself cleaned after a blowjob.

Dr Dutch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19935
  • The Incredible Dr Dutch
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #29 on: February 20, 2012, 02:11:42 PM »
Clean should be no visible effect of gear enhancing your physique I guess...really don't know how long, or if ever after a hefty period of usage.

dustin

  • Guest
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #30 on: February 20, 2012, 02:16:08 PM »
I'd say after two or three years of using no performance enhancing drugs, that I could consider someone to be clean. Not NATURAL, but clean. Once you ingest an exogenous hormone you've lost your natural status, not like it's anything special. You're a fag if you're natural and try to bodybuild, because bodybuilding = DRUGS.

Natural bodybuilding lol... just a schmoe show.

The Grim Lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #31 on: February 20, 2012, 02:48:57 PM »
I have been clean many years and have not lost any muscle from when i was on. Maybe because i had reached my natural limits first or because i've kept training. Anyway i'm far far ahead of any true natural and still on par with serious long-term juicers in my gym.

dustin

  • Guest
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #32 on: February 20, 2012, 03:40:28 PM »
I have been clean many years and have not lost any muscle from when i was on. Maybe because i had reached my natural limits first or because i've kept training. Anyway i'm far far ahead of any true natural and still on par with serious long-term juicers in my gym.

I hate when people say "I've lost no muscle at all"... there's so much shit wrong with this, but in any event I do agree that you're different after having juiced. Your natural base definitely changes. When I've been off for a while I can see the same thing. I've seen it with people who've only cycled a few times too. Very different afterwards.

Stats and proportions can be the same as when someone was on, but anyone who's "ON" will look way better than someone who's off if they have the same stats. No ifs, ands or buts. Stats and proportions mean fuck all. What someone looks like is what matters.

(rant not particularly directed at you)

King Shizzo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 35042
  • Ron crowned me King because I always deliver.
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #33 on: February 20, 2012, 03:46:49 PM »
Layne Norton clean?  or Skip Lacour clean?

HTexan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20031
  • Heath must lose!!
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #34 on: February 20, 2012, 03:52:44 PM »
I know some natural BB associations require 5-7 years to be considered clean. What's Getbiggers opinions on this!
a= age
y = years on

a-y=0
A

The Grim Lifter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3810
Re: How many years is considered CLEAN.
« Reply #35 on: February 20, 2012, 08:14:53 PM »
I hate when people say "I've lost no muscle at all"... there's so much shit wrong with this, but in any event I do agree that you're different after having juiced. Your natural base definitely changes. When I've been off for a while I can see the same thing. I've seen it with people who've only cycled a few times too. Very different afterwards.

Stats and proportions can be the same as when someone was on, but anyone who's "ON" will look way better than someone who's off if they have the same stats. No ifs, ands or buts. Stats and proportions mean fuck all. What someone looks like is what matters.

(rant not particularly directed at you)

Ur right. Traps arn't as elevated, skin not the same, slightly different look. But i competed at a weight and i am only 7-8 pounds heavier than that weight all the time so i can tell if i have changed or not. Also muscle maturity/quality over time has made me look better in that regard.