Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
April 18, 2014, 03:02:57 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 15   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sandra Fluke: Liar/Slut/Whore/Communist/Leftist/Leech/Fake/Fraud  (Read 8446 times)
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5193


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #225 on: March 09, 2012, 12:20:56 PM »

Factor Investigation: Ex-Obama Official Running Sandra Fluke
By Bill O'Reilly




As we reported last night, "The Factor" believes that the Sandra Fluke contraception controversy was manufactured to divert attention away from the Obama administration's disastrous decision to force Catholic non-profit organizations to provide insurance coverage for birth control and the morning after pill. That might very well be unconstitutional.
 
Anyway, we're having trouble tracking down just who is sending Sandra around to the media. It's very strange. So far, the 30-year-old activist has appeared on eight national news programs where she was not challenged at all. Last week, we called Sandra on her cell phone and invited her on "The Factor." She didn't call back, very unusual. There was no other public contact for the woman, just her cell phone.
 
A man named Mike has booked her on a few programs, but we can't even get his last name. And Mike doesn't provide call-back numbers to those with whom he speaks. So Mike, who are you? And why the subterfuge?
 
Now, late today we found out that Ms. Fluke is now being repped by the progressive PR agency SKDKnickerbocker where Anita Dunn, the former Obama communications director is the managing editor... a-ha.
 
So, this whole deal comes back to the White House, at least indirectly. So, let's run down what we know. Sandra Fluke is a former head of the group "Georgetown University Law Students for Reproductive Justice." On February 9th, a group called "The Feminist Majority Foundation" arranged for Sandra to appear at press conference criticizing the Catholic bishops for objecting to President Obama's contraception mandate.
 
After that, Congressman Elijah Cummings, the former Chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, invited Sandra to testify in front of the House Oversight Committee. But she was turned down by the chair, Congressman Darrell Issa, because she had no expertise in the church/state subject matter.
 
Nevertheless, Ms. Fluke went to the hearing and afterward complained to ABC News that she had been denied. A week later, Nancy Pelosi staged a mock hearing starring Sandra. After which Rush Limbaugh made derogatory comments elevating her to left-wing martyrdom.
 
So it seems there is a powerful presence behind Sandra Fluke. And as the polls show the controversy has benefited the President of the United States, who is on the ropes with the church deal. This is all the more amazing because the controversy Sandra is embracing is completely bogus as I explained on "The View" today.
 
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
 
O'REILLY: Do you guys know what Title 10 is? Do you know what Title 10 is?
 
JOY BEHAR, CO-HOST, "THE VIEW": Explain it.
 
O'REILLY: Do you what it... ok. So it's in motion now that if you need birth control and you go to a federal clinic you get it.
 
ELISABETH HASSELBECK, CO-HOST, "THE VIEW": Yes.
 
O'REILLY: That's under Title 10 of the Public Health Act.
 
BARBARA WALTERS, CO-HOST, "THE VIEW": Right.
 
O'REILLY: All right, so there really isn't any... nay problem. You can get it and then if you don't want to drive down to the clinic you can go to Wal-Mart or you can go to Target and get it for $9 a month. So to insert this into a giant Obama care bill seems to be unnecessary to me.
 
(END VIDEO CLIP)
 
O'REILLY: And by the way the ladies were respectful and we had a very good and necessary discussion.
 
Now "Talking Points" believes that very quietly President Obama will pull back on his demand that the Catholic Church cover contraception. He has snatched victory from the jaws of defeat and would be foolish to continue flogging an unconstitutional mandate.
 
Mr. Obama knows the polls say many American women now believe he is protecting them. For that he can thank Sandra Fluke and whoever is running her.
 
And that's "The Memo."
 
  http://nation.foxnews.com/bill-oreilly/2012/03/08/factor-investigation-ex-obama-official-running-sandra-fluke

Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5193


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #226 on: March 09, 2012, 04:00:48 PM »

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7dFyaq-pYc" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7dFyaq-pYc</a>
Report to moderator   Logged
kcballer
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 4598


In you I feel so pretty, In you I taste God


View Profile
« Reply #227 on: March 09, 2012, 04:21:51 PM »

So much melting down going on.
Report to moderator   Logged

Abandon every hope...
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 18141


Team Nurse Bangers


View Profile
« Reply #228 on: March 09, 2012, 04:26:26 PM »

So much melting down going on.
Eh, most of its justified IMHO, I mean its pretty clear they engineered this whole thing to garner Women's support for the Democrats.
Report to moderator   Logged
Straw Man
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 24038


one dwells in nirvana


View Profile
« Reply #229 on: March 09, 2012, 04:36:55 PM »

Eh, most of its justified IMHO, I mean its pretty clear they engineered this whole thing to garner Women's support for the Democrats.

LOL

yeah that's clearly what happened

It's not like no one would even know her name If Rush hadn't decided to lie and slander her for 3 days straight
Report to moderator   Logged
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 18141


Team Nurse Bangers


View Profile
« Reply #230 on: March 09, 2012, 04:40:25 PM »

LOL

yeah that's clearly what happened

It's not like no one would even know her name If Rush hadn't decided to lie and slander her for 3 days straight
Im talking about her getting to testify in front of Congress after being rejected, and the fact that she apparently was put there indirectly by the WH ties. Rush has nothing to do with that.
I know you cant wrap your head around that Rush isnt everyones "de facto head of the republican party", but I dont give a fuck about Rush and dont listen to the fat fuck.
Report to moderator   Logged
Straw Man
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 24038


one dwells in nirvana


View Profile
« Reply #231 on: March 09, 2012, 04:46:04 PM »

Im talking about her getting to testify in front of Congress after being rejected, and the fact that she apparently was put there indirectly by the WH ties. Rush has nothing to do with that.
I know you cant wrap your head around that Rush isnt everyones "de facto head of the republican party", but I dont give a fuck about Rush and dont listen to the fat fuck.

She had as much right to present a point of view on contraception as any of the men who were "testifying"

If Rush hadn't decided to attack her no one would know her name and it would have been a  "non-story"

Rush made it a story by lying about her for three days in a row



Report to moderator   Logged
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15771


With a keen eye for details, one truth prevails.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #232 on: March 09, 2012, 04:46:12 PM »

Im talking about her getting to testify in front of Congress after being rejected, and the fact that she apparently was put there indirectly by the WH ties. Rush has nothing to do with that.
I know you cant wrap your head around that Rush isnt everyones "de facto head of the republican party", but I dont give a fuck about Rush and dont listen to the fat fuck.

Don't politicians bring in their people all the time to talk to congress? Isn't that how it works?

I don't know politicians so I don't get asked to testify in front of congress... I'm sure if I did, I would get invited or something.
Report to moderator   Logged
Straw Man
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 24038


one dwells in nirvana


View Profile
« Reply #233 on: March 09, 2012, 04:50:43 PM »

Don't politicians bring in their people all the time to talk to congress? Isn't that how it works?

I don't know politicians so I don't get asked to testify in front of congress... I'm sure if I did, I would get invited or something.

All the time and you almost never hear about it

Can anyone tell us the names of the men that spoke at Issa's hearing and justify their legitimacy?

I suspect that no one knows any of their names without looking them up and the same would be true of Fluke Rush hadn't decided she was going to be an easy target to bully.
Report to moderator   Logged
Shockwave
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 18141


Team Nurse Bangers


View Profile
« Reply #234 on: March 09, 2012, 05:00:26 PM »

She had as much right to present a point of view on contraception as any of the men who were "testifying"

If Rush hadn't decided to attack her no one would know her name and it would have been a  "non-story"

Rush made it a story by lying about her for three days in a row




won't get any argument here. Rush fucked the party out of the women's vote, and she became that much more of political tool for the democrats.
My point was that she was rejected for.testimony since apparently she wasn't qualified enough to be there. Someone pulled strings, and they did it for a reason. She was misrepresented to people and.used as a political tool being potrayed as something she wasn't. (Struggling college student when in reality she was a radical targeting that school specifically to try and her ideals on the majority.

She doesn't.represent a struggling student just trying to make ends.meet, shes.a.radical.activist who was given a nationwide forum to push her ideals, only because it just happened to line up with the current admins agenda, and that's what pissed.me.off.

I'd have no problem they randomly picked a female student who really was struggling, instead.of a.woman who specifically manufactured the whole situation to push her radical feminism on religious.institutions.
Report to moderator   Logged
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15771


With a keen eye for details, one truth prevails.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #235 on: March 09, 2012, 05:03:14 PM »

won't get any argument here. Rush fucked the party out of the women's vote, and she became that much more of political tool for the democrats.
My point was that she was rejected for.testimony since apparently she wasn't qualified enough to be there. Someone pulled strings, and they did it for a reason. She was misrepresented to people and.used as a political tool being potrayed as something she wasn't. (Struggling college student when in reality she was a radical targeting that school specifically to try and her ideals on the majority.

She doesn't.represent a struggling student just trying to make ends.meet, shes.a.radical.activist who was given a nationwide forum to push her ideals, only because it just happened to line up with the current admins agenda, and that's what pissed.me.off.

I'd have no problem they randomly picked a female student who really was struggling, instead.of a.woman who specifically manufactured the whole situation to push her radical feminism on religious.institutions.

What are the qualifications to testify before Congress?

Didn't I see a bunch of baseball players doing so before? John Denver and Dee Snider?

What do we need to "qualify" to testify before Congress?
Report to moderator   Logged
Straw Man
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 24038


one dwells in nirvana


View Profile
« Reply #236 on: March 09, 2012, 05:07:58 PM »

won't get any argument here. Rush fucked the party out of the women's vote, and she became that much more of political tool for the democrats.
My point was that she was rejected for.testimony since apparently she wasn't qualified enough to be there. Someone pulled strings, and they did it for a reason. She was misrepresented to people and.used as a political tool being potrayed as something she wasn't. (Struggling college student when in reality she was a radical targeting that school specifically to try and her ideals on the majority.

She doesn't.represent a struggling student just trying to make ends.meet, shes.a.radical.activist who was given a nationwide forum to push her ideals, only because it just happened to line up with the current admins agenda, and that's what pissed.me.off.

I'd have no problem they randomly picked a female student who really was struggling, instead.of a.woman who specifically manufactured the whole situation to push her radical feminism on religious.institutions.

That was Issa's claim but I don't buy it

She was perfectly suited to present her point of view as she and people she knows have been negatively effected by the current situation (lack of access to contraception via a health care provider)

If he didn't want her there he could have had another woman instead

the image of having 5 men testify on the mandate for religious employers to provide access to contraception without having a single women offering testimony is just ridiculous

Again, contrary to her not being qualified - I think she was a perfectly legitimate speaker and had a legitimate right to address congress as the other 5 who were allowed to speak

Just in case it's not clear...... These are my opinions
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5193


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #237 on: March 14, 2012, 08:04:49 PM »

http://thegraph.com/2012/03/sandra-flukes-boyfriend


WTF!!!!   

I called it.    This bitch and her BF are communists! 
Report to moderator   Logged
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15771


With a keen eye for details, one truth prevails.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #238 on: March 14, 2012, 09:10:01 PM »

What does her BF have to do with her idea of contraceptives?
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5193


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #239 on: March 14, 2012, 09:14:02 PM »

What does her BF have to do with her idea of contraceptives?

it's not about  BC for these communists.   
Report to moderator   Logged
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15771


With a keen eye for details, one truth prevails.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #240 on: March 14, 2012, 09:16:11 PM »

it's not about  BC for these communists.   

Sounds like she was specifically talking about BC... but that's just what I heard.
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5193


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #241 on: March 15, 2012, 07:19:02 AM »

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/03/poor-sandra-fluke-she-wants-you-to-pay-for-her-9month-birth-control-as-she-frolics-in-spain-pompeii


Report to moderator   Logged
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15771


With a keen eye for details, one truth prevails.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #242 on: March 15, 2012, 10:31:20 AM »


She specifically was not talking about herself at the current time... Her statements said so.

You know this.
Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5193


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #243 on: March 15, 2012, 10:32:55 AM »

She specifically was not talking about herself at the current time... Her statements said so.

You know this.

Really?  Than why testify at all? 

"40% of my friends say they cant afford BC"  ? ? ?   Please.   

This bitch is also on record as advocating the employers be forced to pay for employees' sex changes.   
Report to moderator   Logged
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15771


With a keen eye for details, one truth prevails.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #244 on: March 15, 2012, 10:34:42 AM »

Really?  Than why testify at all? 

"40% of my friends say they cant afford BC"  ? ? ?   Please.   

This bitch is also on record as advocating the employers be forced to pay for employees' sex changes.   

Hey, I'm not saying I agree with all of her points... I just simply look at it fiscally... I'd rather pay for BC than have to pay 18 years for a welfare baby... That's all I care about.

Of course I don't think employers should pay for sexual reassignment unless the employer specifically wants to.

Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5193


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #245 on: March 15, 2012, 10:35:53 AM »

Hey, I'm not saying I agree with all of her points... I just simply look at it fiscally... I'd rather pay for BC than have to pay 18 years for a welfare baby... That's all I care about.

Of course I don't think employers should pay for sexual reassignment unless the employer specifically wants to.



How can the govt ensure that the women will use it?   will Obama's Team of African Ball Washers be there to put the condom on the men before sex?   
Report to moderator   Logged
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15771


With a keen eye for details, one truth prevails.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #246 on: March 15, 2012, 10:38:47 AM »

How can the govt ensure that the women will use it?   will Obama's Team of African Ball Washers be there to put the condom on the men before sex?   

They won't but if it's available, then there's a good excuse for not having Welfare children right?

We have provided you with all you need to NOT have a baby if you can't afford it... If you go and have a baby now, you're on your own.

In my mind, this is laying the groundwork for getting rid of welfare babies and no one wants to take it.

Report to moderator   Logged
Soul Crusher
Competitors
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 5193


Doesnt lie about lifting.


View Profile
« Reply #247 on: March 15, 2012, 10:41:37 AM »

They won't but if it's available, then there's a good excuse for not having Welfare children right?

We have provided you with all you need to NOT have a baby if you can't afford it... If you go and have a baby now, you're on your own.

In my mind, this is laying the groundwork for getting rid of welfare babies and no one wants to take it.



contraception is nearly free now and those with halth insurance through work are not typically those who end up on welfare.   
Report to moderator   Logged
tu_holmes
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15771


With a keen eye for details, one truth prevails.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #248 on: March 15, 2012, 10:47:01 AM »

contraception is nearly free now and those with halth insurance through work are not typically those who end up on welfare.   

Typically is a relative statement... I have seen / heard of many people WITH jobs who end up getting assistance with children.
Report to moderator   Logged
Straw Man
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 24038


one dwells in nirvana


View Profile
« Reply #249 on: March 15, 2012, 10:58:44 AM »

Typically is a relative statement... I have seen / heard of many people WITH jobs who end up getting assistance with children.


you're trying to have a rational conversation with a mentally disturbed person of sub-par intelligence

you know by now it doesn't matter what someone says

333 will "hear" whatever he wants and be stunned when you don't "see" or "hear" it too
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 15   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!