i said clearly that nasser was the most impressive from the front in his time and this is very true.. dorian at his best deserved to beat nasser because of his unbeatable back only.. imagine dorian with levrone's back,.. would he have won any sandow??.. on the other hand imagine nasser with levrone's back!!!.. i hope i have simplified things well for you to understand..
but you were not too smart to say kevin and ronnie destroying nasser from the front and to support your claim you put shots from a contest where both of them came after him .. so according to you why nasser beat ronnie on that day??.. because he had a better back!!!!!..
This is what you typed
Nasser is Most impressive from the front? nearly perfect from the front? not a single weak point?And typical Sherierf piss-poor reading comprehension , please show me where I ever said ' kevin and ronnie destroying nasser from the front ' please show me where I typed that
I said they make him look like a block of clay and even if I did say they were destroying him from the front , Nasser could have easily lost the front poses and still won the contest so that plea of how that somehow backfired on me because he won the contest doesn't prove anything , so either way you're fucked
Nasser may be the most impressive from the front to you , nearly perfect from the front? NO WAY and not a single weak point? HA
lets ignore his long torso , high lats , short legs and his lagging forearms but other than that he's ' perfect '