Author Topic: can an average nobody that is not fat achieve a 315 legit bench without roids?  (Read 30609 times)

DBX

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 709
1. Im not jeajonna

2. I can bench 315

3. Your legs look like they haven't seen a barbell in 20 years, so i suggest you drop the tough guy act, "big guy".  ;)

groink prefers the adductor machine

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
1. Im not jeajonna

2. I can bench 315

3. Your legs look like they haven't seen a barbell in 20 years, so i suggest you drop the tough guy act, "big guy".  ;)


lets see yours too...oh that's right...we already have....LOLOLOLOLOLOL  :D

still "spilling over"  ;)

never compare yourself to me

purenaturalstrength

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3975
sooo i'm looking at this workout chart from the highly acclaimed bench press program...

http://medlem.spray.se/damienthorne/tab1.pdf

you basically go to your 1 rep max and it gives you your workout progressions


but since i use the metric system this is all fucked up


i mean i guess i can use micro plates but this is just getting silly when converted to kilos

sucks

i wonder if these charts exist in kilos

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
groink prefers the adductor machine


So that's a "no" on backing up your big mouth then ?

DBX

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 709

Prove it  ;) show me how "skinny" mine are  :)

And i don't squat anymore, but when I did i could  knock out clean reps with 405


hahaha  if you put 405 on your back with those stilts you would end up a crumpled mess ala jeane peirre fux

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
hahaha  if you put 405 on your back with those stilts you would end up a crumpled mess ala jeane peirre fux

I've squatted 495 for a triple.

and until you shut the fuck up and post a picture of your legs being better, mine own yours  ;)

purenaturalstrength

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3975
I've squatted 495 for a triple.
i very much doubt that

respectfully pns

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
i very much doubt that

respectfully pns

I was 265 pounds when i did it..in these pics i'm 225-230

purenaturalstrength

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3975
I was 265 pounds when i did it..in these pics i'm 225-230
ok that changes the story

were you megadosing or pretty fat?

DBX

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 709
first it was 405 , now its 495  ::)  oh brother

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
ok that changes the story

were you megadosing or pretty fat?

Bulked to the max, kinda fat  Sharief has the pic...i don't anymore

heaviest I have ever been

MONSTER_TRICEPS

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4255
495 for a triple, damn

another prime example that strength doesn't equal hypertrophy  :D





Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
first it was 405 , now its 495  ::)  oh brother

Oh brother...a gimmick with a smartass mouth that doesn't believe me, and won't post a pic...what will i do now  :'(

 ::) ::)

purenaturalstrength

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3975
495 for a triple, damn

another prime example that strength doesn't equal hypertrophy  :D






he said he was bulked up to super fat and squating now he is lean down and not squating anymore he only works calves he said i believe

he seems to have a big ego and a propensity for personal attacks but i dont see how a 265 juiced up fatass couldn't squat 495 for a couple

i can believe it

DBX

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 709
Oh brother...a gimmick with a smartass mouth that doesn't believe me, and won't post a pic...what will i do now  :'(

 ::) ::)
lol groink begging for pics of my cock

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
lol  next groink will be begging for pics of my cock

Ahhh .....the old "you're gay asking for my pic" routine...could you be any more by the numbers  ::)

what's next......"i only lift for myself and i don't care what people think, I feel no need to post a pic"  ::)

                                       OR

"I can't post a pic for security/personal/employment reasons"  ::) ::)

point is...shithead. if you are gonna crack on people, you will be called out yourself,and every time you make an excuse,or deflect the question.... and don't fess up......you become more and more of a meaningless dickhead gimmick who is all talk

purenaturalstrength

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3975
can anybody tell me how i can apply this routine to metric system or should i just divide everything by 2.2 and work with odd numbers and micro plates?

DBX

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 709
Ahhh .....the old "you're gay asking for my pic" routine...could you be any more by the numbers  ::)

what's next......"i only lift for myself and i don't care what people think, I feel no need to post a pic"  ::)

                                       OR

"I can't post a pic for security/personal/employment reasons"  ::) ::)

point is...shithead. if you are gonna crack on people, you will be called out yourself,and every time you make an excuse,or deflect the question.... and don't fess up......you become more and more of a meaningless dickhead gimmick who is all talk
over analyzing meltdown 

BB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17730
  • I hope I'm not boring you.
can anybody tell me how i can apply this routine to metric system or should i just divide everything by 2.2 and work with odd numbers and micro plates?

Divide by 2.2 and use micro plates, or round it close enough and forget the micros if they're hard to find at your gym.

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
over analyzing meltdown 

Oooh..."meltdown"

what's next.."it's not that serious"  ::) ::)

I've acknowledged your meager existence long enough. I am superior...deal with it you microscopic cumstain.

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
  • SC è un asino
sooo i'm looking at this workout chart from the highly acclaimed bench press program...

http://medlem.spray.se/damienthorne/tab1.pdf

you basically go to your 1 rep max and it gives you your workout progressions


but since i use the metric system this is all fucked up


i mean i guess i can use micro plates but this is just getting silly when converted to kilos

sucks

i wonder if these charts exist in kilos

I don't know if the link is there, but if you put the chart in Excel, it can be easily converted.

Also, arch is achieved naturally by tucking the feet under the bench.   The goal here is strength, and that position puts you at an advantage.  Bench drives from the legs.
Y

purenaturalstrength

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 3975
I don't know if the link is there, but if you put the chart in Excel, it can be easily converted.

Also, arch is achieved naturally by tucking the feet under the bench.   The goal here is strength, and that position puts you at an advantage.  Bench drives from the legs.

thanks friend, i will have to study how to convert this with excel

but the program text said

my last suggestion regarding technique concerns arching the back-don't do it. True, it will almost always improve your bench-press poundage, but the advantage is entirely artificial. When you arch your back, you reduce the distance between your chest and the bar. Doing it will not accelerate muscle growth or increase strength.

Palpatine Q

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24132
  • Disdain/repugnance....Version 3: glare variation B
I don't know if the link is there, but if you put the chart in Excel, it can be easily converted.

Also, arch is achieved naturally by tucking the feet under the bench.   The goal here is strength, and that position puts you at an advantage.  Bench drives from the legs.

Yep...arch is natural, and doesn't negate the lift one bit. you are supposed to arch when you bench...just not ridiculously

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24623
  • SC è un asino
thanks friend, i will have to study how to convert this with excel

but the program text said

my last suggestion regarding technique concerns arching the back-don't do it. True, it will almost always improve your bench-press poundage, but the advantage is entirely artificial. When you arch your back, you reduce the distance between your chest and the bar. Doing it will not accelerate muscle growth or increase strength.

Not advocating an insane, powerlifting arch like I've seen them do, more what Groink said above.
Y

The RedMeatKid

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2159
Lot of pussies in this thread...if you were talking 405 I could understand the skepticism.. but 315? How weak are you fucking people.

And Dj181.....shut the fuck up and go take some oxys so you aren't scared to talk to girls....leave the weightlifting talk to real men
"Real men"? Ask Groink some NFL/sports related questions and you'll soon learn the meaning of "latent homosexual".;)
(