and a 3rd party is not doing that
all a 3rd parting it doing is running advertisements expressing an opinion
that's it
so why the 3 pages of hysterics about "censorship" ?
Its the very definition of censorship.
The advertisement is merely a means to the end - the end is taking Rush off the air because they dont like what he has to say.
I dont give a fuck what their means of accomplishing their goals are - trying to force someone to shut up because they dont like what is being said, is censorship. \
Just running an ad campaign on why not to listen to Limbaugh would be perfectly acceptable.
Running a campaign with the objective of making it so he's no longer speaking on the air is censorship.
Their entire goal is censorship. Again youre arguing a completley different point. How they do it is a whole nother topic - the end result is censorship. They want Limbaugh censored.
Again - It is the very DEFINITION of censorship.
Last time im posting on this. Im done with you arguing non-points and semantics.
Oh, a quote from the article -
"This is not about women,” said Rachel Nelson, Premiere spokeswoman. “It’s not about ethics and it’s not about the nature of our public discourse. It’s a direct attack on America’s guaranteed First Amendment right to free speech. It’s essentially a call for censorship masquerading as high-minded indignation.”