Disobeying the police dispatcher's orders to not follow the suspect overrides his authority as a "Neighborhood Watchman", where an imminent danger could have been avoided. This is the technicality that shall be argued against Zimmerman. If one is to scrutinize the phone call evidence, you have to admit his actions were "WRONG." There is a reason why he is not a police officer, where he is not trained to handle potential threats of this nature. Evidence provided show his reluctance to follow orders. Put aside your morals, he initiated the confrontation that he was authorized to avoid. Furthermore, this weakens his argument of self-defense when he was told other lawful dispatchers would investigate the possible threat. The victim provided no evidential threat to others and is evident within 911 phone conversation. As an officer who disobeys his commander in the line of duty, this too would be seen as an unlawful act. AKA "WRONG"
