Author Topic: 2012 Vice President Candidates  (Read 15783 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #75 on: May 25, 2012, 01:29:02 PM »
If you look at some of the older PPP polls which have a Obama v. Romney v. Paul match-up, Romney gets destroyed thanks to Ron Paul. If you look at some of the Obama v. Romney v. Johnson match-up polls, Romney is in trouble. Picking a libertarian-conservative like Ron Paul or Rand Paul could help him with Democrats, independents, and the youth vote. Romney's biggest problem is that he's too much of an Establishment GOP guy to do anything like that.

A poll showing Obama v. Romney v. Paul isn't realistic at all.  Paul doesn't have the money or the following to run as an independent.  I doubt he could get on the ballot in all 50 states.  He also doesn't have the votes.  Here is the primary/caucus vote tally to date:

Romney - 6,904,809
Santorum - 3,664,006
Gingrich - 2,568,313
Paul - 1,651,141

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/republican_vote_count.html

Not nearly enough support.  Very vocal supporters, but they are small in number.   

And I guess we'll see how big of an impact Gary Johnson makes as the libertarian nominee.  The libertarin nominee in 2008, Bob Barr (a stone cold idiot), got 524,524 votes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2008#Turnout    I doubt Johnson does much better.   

howardroark

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2524
  • Resident Objectivist & Autodidact
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #76 on: May 25, 2012, 01:49:56 PM »
In a three-way race, Ron Paul would get 15% to Romney's 33% and Obama's 45%: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2011/08/obama-stronger-vs-romney-with-3rd-party-bids.html

Johnson polling at 7% nationally in a three-way race to Romney's 40% and Obama's 47%: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/02/santorum-down-five-romney-seven-vs-obama-nationally.html#more

Johnson polling at 15% in New Mexico: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_NM_425.pdf

Johnson polling at 7% in New Hampshire: http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_NH_051512.pdf

Johnson polling at 9% in Arizona: http://www.uncoveredpolitics.com/2012/05/24/ppp-survey-shows-johnson-polling-at-9-in-arizona/

So yes, the libertarian vote is important if Romney wants to win the general election. And that's why picking up Rand Paul as a veep might not be a bad idea. The real question is whether or not libertarians would vote for Romney even if he had a good VP choice.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #77 on: May 25, 2012, 01:57:45 PM »
The libertarian vote is not going to decide the election in 2012.  They are not enough libertarians to make a difference.  The 2008 election shows that.  "There are roughly 250,000 registered Libertarian voters nationwide."  http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=424675.0

Insignificant. 

What Romney needs to win in November is the independent vote and some crossover Democrats.  That's how Obama won in 2008.  Independents and crossover votes (Republicans and Democrats) decide presidential elections, not libertarians. 

 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #78 on: May 25, 2012, 02:37:19 PM »
FOX News just released the transcript.

Romney: "Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  Please endorse me.  "

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #79 on: May 25, 2012, 02:40:51 PM »
Romney's Search for Running Mate Enters Audition Phase
Thursday, 24 May 2012

Mitt Romney's vice presidential search has entered a new phase: auditions.

As his campaign evaluates potential running mates, Republicans with a possible shot at the No. 2 spot on the presidential ticket are starting to engage in unofficial public tryouts for the traditional vice presidential role of attack dog.

Democratic President Barack Obama is "the most ill-prepared person to assume the presidency in my lifetime," New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie declared in a speech in Kentucky this week. Florida Sen. Marco Rubio told South Carolina Republicans that there hasn't been such a "divisive figure in modern American history" as Obama.

Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan, speaking Tuesday at the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library — it's a favorite venue for Republicans seeking more attention — said Obama "wants to take us further in the wrong direction." In an Alabama appearance this month, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal called Obama "the most incompetent president since Jimmy Carter."

Not that any of them — or any of the others who may have landed a spot on Romney's list — are talking about becoming vice president. Nor are any of them acknowledging that they're trying out for the role or saying the Romney campaign has asked them to do so. Top Romney aides are sworn to secrecy, as are potential running mates and their staffs — an example of the Romney campaign's closely controlled, no-leaks culture.

But their high-profile appearances come more than a month after Romney assumed, for all practical purposes, leadership of the Republican Party. His vice presidential search is well under way, with his Boston headquarters engaged in a secretive process of weighing the pros and cons of each potential pick.

With three months to go until Republican National Convention, his campaign has little time to waste as it meticulously prepares the presumptive Republican nominee to make one of his most important decisions. With it will come implications not just for whether he'll win the White House but how he would govern.

Knowledge of the process is limited to a few of Romney's highest-level aides. Information is on a "need-to-know" basis — and as far as those aides are concerned, there are few people inside the Boston headquarters at 585 Commercial St. who need to know, let alone reporters and other outsiders. The Republicans who discussed the vice presidential selection process did so on the condition of anonymity because the campaign has barred staff from talking about the selection in public.

The process is so secret because it's so sensitive. A vice presidential vetting is possibly the most intense background check in politics. Everything is fair game: voting records and the political past, to be sure, but also personal issues.

"You're sitting down with someone and asked if they've ever had a marital problem, if their spouse has ever cheated on them, if they've ever sought mental health counseling — that's just the beginning," said Sara Fagen, who worked for President George W. Bush and for Romney's 2008 presidential campaign.

If past campaigns are an indication, that level of probing will happen later, after Romney's campaign has narrowed the list to a few people who are under serious consideration. Earlier in the process, potential choices are typically asked fewer invasive biographical questions, as the campaign itself runs through all available public information.

This more basic information will help the campaign narrow the list — and evaluate and prepare to deal with potential trouble spots in the backgrounds of those who make it through. The campaign team will have to be prepared to deal with past statements that might publicly contradict Romney or give Obama's team an extra opening to criticize his Republican opponent. The Democratic president had to deal with this in 2008, when Republicans gleefully circulated a clip of Joe Biden, now Obama's vice president, saying Obama was "not ready" to be president.

The Republicans who are informally auditioning each would bring different strengths — and drawbacks — to the ticket.

Ohio Sen. Rob Portman supported Romney early, has a solid rapport with the candidate and hails from a critical battleground state that could decide the election. But he wouldn't necessarily appeal directly to Hispanic or women voters.

Jindal, the Louisiana governor, could help Romney turn out the religious right and would add diversity to the ticket as an Indian-American, but he struggled during a national debut rebutting the 2010 State of the Union address.

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell appeals to social conservatives but signed a controversial state law that requires Virginia women to have an ultrasound test before an abortion.

New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte, who's campaigned frequently with Romney, could help with female voters and in her swing state of New Hampshire. But she's from New England, the same region of the country as Romney, while Christie, a conservative favorite who can work a crowd, is from New Jersey.

Rubio could bring Florida, always a deciding factor in a general election, and appeal to Hispanics, a fast-growing voting bloc, but he's run into some trouble over a foreclosed home and possible misuse of an official credit card. Ryan is a serious, leading policy mind with a bright future. But while Romney has endorsed the Wisconsin congressman's controversial budget, picking Ryan could shine a brighter spotlight on a plan that would make major changes to Medicare.

As deliberations and the informal auditions continue, potential candidates are perfecting their non-denial denials about providing any information to the Romney campaign.

"The Romney campaign has a policy, and I'm a national co-chair of the campaign, that we don't talk about the vice presidential policy in terms of timing whether it relates to me or anyone else or the aspects of that," former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, another possible pick who was featured in a new ad Romney released Thursday, told MSNBC last week when asked if he'd agreed to be vetted. "That's just the campaign policy. We don't discuss the details of that process."

"I'm not getting into that. I'm not changing any of my answers," Ryan told the Washington Examiner's editorial board recently when asked about the process. "I get asked this every time I walk down the street. I'm not giving you any answers."

Or they're not saying anything at all. After a speech at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday, reporters questioned Rubio about whether he was being considered for vice president.

"Senator, would you like to answer any questions about vice president?" one reporter asked.

Rubio, smiling, turned and walked away.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Romney-VP-audition-search/2012/05/24/id/440225

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #80 on: June 03, 2012, 04:27:01 PM »
Romney could pick VP early, and cash in often
By Steve Holland
WASHINGTON | Fri Jun 1, 2012

(Reuters) - Senator John McCain waited until just before the 2008 Republican convention to name his vice presidential pick, sticking to a timing tradition thought to pump up party activists before the big push to Election Day.

This year, there is at least a small chance that Republican Mitt Romney might break with tradition and name his vice presidential choice earlier in the summer, according to people advising the campaign.

Romney and a small circle of confidants are working quietly on a list of high-profile Republicans being considered for the No. 2 position. The confidants include his wife, Ann, long-time adviser Beth Myers and campaign manager Matt Rhoades.

Outside advisers to the Romney campaign, who spoke on condition of anonymity, say he has the option of announcing his choice well before the Republican convention where Romney will be nominated, in Tampa in late August.

The tradition is to announce the No. 2 around the time of the convention to inspire grassroots activists and seek maximum publicity for the final two-month push to the November 6 election.

But in this case, the Romney team has discussed whether to announce the pick a few weeks earlier to generate buzz for his campaign during August and help raise campaign funds.

It is far from clear, according to the outside advisers, on whether this route will be taken. But many Republicans see an advantage in going early.

"You double your ability to campaign, you double your ability to raise money," said one Republican official. "You get a longer media halo," said another.

Romney's list is a closely guarded secret, but speculation has centered on a host of Republican leaders including Ohio Senator Rob Portman, Florida Senator Marco Rubio and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.

Over the coming weeks, those on the list will undergo a background investigation, turning over financial records and any other documents to lawyers hired by the campaign to provide as full a picture as possible of their lives.

THE VETTING WINDOW

Chris Lehane, a Democratic strategist who was a senior adviser to Al Gore's 2000 presidential campaign, said the probing is extensive because the vice presidential choice is the first high-profile decision the candidate makes and it must be done correctly to show Americans the candidate can be trusted.

"It was everything you could imagine, making available your tax returns over X number of years, documents on everything you owned, anything that could prove embarrassing," said Lehane.

Gore started out with about 20 names. Then the list was cut to 10 and then down to five and the rigor of the vetting became more serious. He eventually chose Senator Joe Lieberman, a moderate Democrat who later became an independent and was a top choice for McCain in 2008.

"A lot of these folks didn't get through the initial vet - not necessarily because of anything scandalous. You start to look at votes, at positions. At the end of the day you end up with a limited number of folks," said Lehane.

Once the vetting is complete, only a handful of names are usually left, leaving the candidate with a choice of which direction to go in.

"At that point it's a decision for the candidate for his comfort level, confidence in the person and maybe political considerations," said a Republican official involved in past vetting procedures.

Romney could try to appeal to Hispanics, for example, by picking the Cuban-American Rubio, or he could try to improve his chances in the swing state of Ohio by choosing Portman. Many other names offer similar scenarios.

Romney's campaign says his main qualifications are for someone who could take over as president should anything happen to him, and someone with whom he has a high level of comfort.

Most Republican analysts expect him to pick a relatively safe choice to avoid a repeat of McCain's 2008 pick of former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, who enlivened the Republican conservative base but was seen as not up to the job of vice president.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/01/us-usa-campaign-romney-vp-idUSBRE85018O20120601

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19338
  • Getbig!
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #81 on: June 03, 2012, 05:23:41 PM »
Romney could pick VP early, and cash in often
By Steve Holland
WASHINGTON | Fri Jun 1, 2012

(Reuters) - Senator John McCain waited until just before the 2008 Republican convention to name his vice presidential pick, sticking to a timing tradition thought to pump up party activists before the big push to Election Day.

This year, there is at least a small chance that Republican Mitt Romney might break with tradition and name his vice presidential choice earlier in the summer, according to people advising the campaign.

Romney and a small circle of confidants are working quietly on a list of high-profile Republicans being considered for the No. 2 position. The confidants include his wife, Ann, long-time adviser Beth Myers and campaign manager Matt Rhoades.

Outside advisers to the Romney campaign, who spoke on condition of anonymity, say he has the option of announcing his choice well before the Republican convention where Romney will be nominated, in Tampa in late August.

The tradition is to announce the No. 2 around the time of the convention to inspire grassroots activists and seek maximum publicity for the final two-month push to the November 6 election.

But in this case, the Romney team has discussed whether to announce the pick a few weeks earlier to generate buzz for his campaign during August and help raise campaign funds.

It is far from clear, according to the outside advisers, on whether this route will be taken. But many Republicans see an advantage in going early.

"You double your ability to campaign, you double your ability to raise money," said one Republican official. "You get a longer media halo," said another.

Romney's list is a closely guarded secret, but speculation has centered on a host of Republican leaders including Ohio Senator Rob Portman, Florida Senator Marco Rubio and New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.

Over the coming weeks, those on the list will undergo a background investigation, turning over financial records and any other documents to lawyers hired by the campaign to provide as full a picture as possible of their lives.

THE VETTING WINDOW

Chris Lehane, a Democratic strategist who was a senior adviser to Al Gore's 2000 presidential campaign, said the probing is extensive because the vice presidential choice is the first high-profile decision the candidate makes and it must be done correctly to show Americans the candidate can be trusted.

"It was everything you could imagine, making available your tax returns over X number of years, documents on everything you owned, anything that could prove embarrassing," said Lehane.

Gore started out with about 20 names. Then the list was cut to 10 and then down to five and the rigor of the vetting became more serious. He eventually chose Senator Joe Lieberman, a moderate Democrat who later became an independent and was a top choice for McCain in 2008.

"A lot of these folks didn't get through the initial vet - not necessarily because of anything scandalous. You start to look at votes, at positions. At the end of the day you end up with a limited number of folks," said Lehane.

Once the vetting is complete, only a handful of names are usually left, leaving the candidate with a choice of which direction to go in.

"At that point it's a decision for the candidate for his comfort level, confidence in the person and maybe political considerations," said a Republican official involved in past vetting procedures.

Romney could try to appeal to Hispanics, for example, by picking the Cuban-American Rubio, or he could try to improve his chances in the swing state of Ohio by choosing Portman. Many other names offer similar scenarios.

Romney's campaign says his main qualifications are for someone who could take over as president should anything happen to him, and someone with whom he has a high level of comfort.

Most Republican analysts expect him to pick a relatively safe choice to avoid a repeat of McCain's 2008 pick of former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, who enlivened the Republican conservative base but was seen as not up to the job of vice president.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/06/01/us-usa-campaign-romney-vp-idUSBRE85018O20120601

Word is, if Romney picks Rubio, Obama can kiss Florida goodbye. I've also heard that LA governor, Bobby Jindal, has an outside shot.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #82 on: June 03, 2012, 06:45:58 PM »
Word is, if Romney picks Rubio, Obama can kiss Florida goodbye. I've also heard that LA governor, Bobby Jindal, has an outside shot.

I was thinking it would be Portman, but I'm starting to think it might be Rubio. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #83 on: June 03, 2012, 06:46:50 PM »
I was thinking it would be Portman, but I'm starting to think it might be Rubio. 

I would prefer jindal over Rubio tbh. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #84 on: June 03, 2012, 06:49:16 PM »
I would prefer jindal over Rubio tbh. 

I like Jindal.  Just really starting to look into Rubio, but he presents himself very well and has a solid background.  I like The Fat Man too. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #85 on: June 06, 2012, 11:28:49 AM »
Bobby Jindal Rising as Romney’s VP Choice
Wednesday, 06 Jun 2012
By Ronald Kessler

Ronald Kessler reporting from Washington, D.C.— Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal is rising as Mitt Romney’s possible pick for vice president, according to campaign sources.

Last month, Americans for Tax Reform President Grover Norquist touted Jindal for the vice presidential slot in an opinion piece for Politico.

Norquist tells me he wrote the piece knowing that “Jindal is a leading option.”
Jindal is rarely mentioned in speculation about Romney’s possible choice. A rising star in the Republican Party, he suffered a setback when he bombed delivering the Republican response to President Barack Obama’s first speech to Congress on Feb. 24, 2009.

Adding Jindal to the Republican presidential ticket would bring to Romney’s fold neither a swing state nor a major ethnic minority. But such political considerations are not foremost in Romney’s mind. He has said he is only interested in choosing a candidate who would make a good president.

As he constantly points out, Romney is a conservative businessman, not a politician. He amassed a fortune of more than $200 million not by making cynical political calculations but by looking for the best — often novel — opportunities and by hiring people based on character, competence, and quality.

Jindal qualifies on all counts — and has an inspiring life story that epitomizes the American dream.

Jindal’s mother Raj was three months pregnant with him when his parents came to this country from Punjab, India in 1971. The daughter of a bank manager, Raj had a scholarship to study for a doctorate in nuclear physics at Louisiana State University.

The family was poor and had no car. But Jindal’s mother read to him each night. His father, Amar, had a bachelor’s degree in civil engineering and eventually got a job with a railroad. He reminded his son almost daily how lucky they were to live in America. Amar was disappointed if his son earned only As in school. He had to bring home A-pluses.

Jindal’s name is Piyush Jindal, but at the age of four, he decided to take the nickname Bobby — after the youngest son in the TV series “The Brady Bunch.”

“Every day after school, I’d come home and I’d watch ‘The Brady Bunch,’” Jindal explains. “And I identified with Bobby, you know? He was about my age, and ‘Bobby’ stuck.”

As a teenager, Jindal competed in tennis tournaments and started a computer newsletter, a retail candy business, and a mail-order software company.

Jindal attended Brown University, where he led the College Republicans and graduated with honors in biology and public policy. He became an intern on the staff of Rep. Jim McCrery, a Republican from Louisiana. After days of performing menial duties, Jindal approached his boss.

“Congressman, I really appreciate the opportunity to be here in Washington and to be one of your interns,” Jindal said, according to McCrery. “For the last few days, I’ve been in the back office doing the filing and sorting and all of those things, and I don’t mind doing that, but I was just wondering, while I’m here, if you could give me an assignment.”

Impressed at Jindal’s pluck, McCrery said, “Write a paper on Medicare and how you solve it.”

Two weeks later, Jindal submitted the paper.

“I read it, and it was excellent,” McCrery says. “For him to grasp as well as he did the Medicare program in such a short period of time was nothing short of amazing.”

Jindal accepted a Rhodes scholarship at Oxford University, where he studied public health policy.

Like Romney, Jindal’s first job entailed making companies run more efficiently. For a year and a half, he worked for McKinsey & Co., a leading management consulting firm.

In 1996 at the age of 24, Jindal was named secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, the state’s largest agency. Jindal cut millions of dollars in waste and fraud. He found that Louisiana was paying lump sums to hospitals at the beginning of the year based on how many Medicaid patients they estimated they would treat. The state rarely checked to see if they had actually treated that number. State-financed clinics that employed a dozen people had no patients.

Jindal went on to be president of the University of Louisiana System. In 2001, President George W. Bush named him assistant secretary of the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services.

After an unsuccessful run at Louisiana governor, Jindal was elected a congressman in 2004 and re-elected two years later. He was the second person of Indian extraction to serve in Congress.

In 2007, Jindal was elected governor of Louisiana and was sworn in on Jan. 14, 2008. Last October, he won re-election with 66 percent of the total vote.

As governor, Jindal has tightened ethics rules, fought government regulation, and six times reduced taxes, including the largest income tax cut in the state’s history. Under Jindal, the state’s credit rating improved. Previously near the bottom of the Better Government Association’s integrity index, Louisiana now ranks fifth in the country.

Jindal refused $98 million from President Obama’s stimulus bill, saying he would not participate in a program aimed at expanding state unemployment insurance coverage. After the federal money ran out, the state’s businesses would have had to pick up the slack by paying higher taxes.

After the 2010 Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explosion, Jindal aggressively led the cleanup effort.

“The difference between him after the BP oil spill and his Democratic predecessor [Gov. Kathleen Blanco] after Katrina could hardly have been more stark,” former Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour has said. “He was decisive, he was knowledgeable, and he was working hard for his people.”

This year, Jindal won impressive legislative victories, signing into law bills that cut state agency spending, allow parents to apply public school financing to private school education with tuition vouchers, tie teacher tenure to student performance, make it harder for newly hired teachers to secure tenure, and replace traditional pension plans with 401(k)-style retirement plans for newly hired state workers.

Like Bill Clinton, Jindal is a policy wonk who overwhelms reporters with statistics. Local reporters try to ask him multiple questions so he won’t spend the next 10 minutes spewing out facts about one issue.

Jindal is married to Supriya Jolly Jindal, whom he first met her when they both attended high school, the Baton Rouge Magnet School. Born in New Delhi, Supriya is the daughter of Indian immigrants. He asked her out, but she turned him down because her family was moving.

“She was the most beautiful girl I’d ever seen,” he said later.

After becoming secretary of the Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals, Jindal asked her to attend a Mardi Gras ball when another date canceled on him. On their second date, they had dinner at Bella Luna in the French Quarter and went on a river boat cruise. They became engaged a few months later.

Supriya graduated magna cum laude with honors from Tulane University in chemical engineering and has a master’s degree from Tulane in business. She is working toward a Ph.D. in marketing from Louisiana State University.

At her first job at a Monsanto Co. plant along the Mississippi River, she could be found climbing a tank vessel wearing a hard hat and steel-toed boots. For fun, she says, she solves calculus problems.

“Kathleen [Blanco] is right, I married better than I deserve,” Jindal has said, referring to his Democratic rival during his first run for governor.

The Jindals have three children: Selia, ten; Shaan, seven; and Slade, five. Bobby delivered Slade at home before an ambulance could arrive. A nurse helped out by telephone.

“It was the most amazing moment of our 10 years of marriage when I was able to hand her our son,” Jindal say. “We had to have confidence and trust in each other. It was a miraculous moment.”

At 40, Jindal looks like he is in his 20s, but he does appear older now than when he gave the Republican response to Obama’s speech to Congress in 2009.

Jindal himself has described his response as a disaster. He read from a single teleprompter and delivered the talk in a sing-song tone. Normally a rapid speaker, he tried to slow himself down with artificial swings in his voice. But he left the impression he was talking down to his audience.

“Look, I’ll be honest, I’ll take responsibility for it,” Jindal said later. “The delivery was awful. It turns out I can’t read teleprompters, turns out I’m much better talking to people.”

Now Jindal eschews teleprompters and relies on a polite, self-deprecating manner to win over his audience. In his second inaugural speech as governor, Jindal leaned over backwards to pay tribute to his predecessor and rival Blanco.

In Norquist’s Politico piece, “Why Mitt Romney Should Tap Bobby Jindal,” the ringleader of the conservative movement points to Jindal’s support of school choice and the fact that he has kept his pledge as governor not to raise taxes.

“Jindal has balanced a budget every year as governor and never resorted to higher taxes,” Norquist wrote in the piece co-authored with Patrick Gleason, ATR’s director of state affairs. “Jindal has sought to make his state as economically competitive as possible.”

While a firm conservative, Jindal is known — like Romney — as a problem solver rather than an ideological politician. He is a hero to gun advocates, having sponsored the so-called Katrina bill that barred law enforcement from confiscating privately owned guns during federal emergencies.

“I can’t think of a governor who’s done more to stand up and protect the Second Amendment than Bobby Jindal,” Chris Cox, the National Rifle Association’s chief lobbyist, says.

Jindal is a hot commodity at GOP fundraising events, including with Americans of Indian extraction, whose median income is twice the national average.

Evangelicals love Jindal’s talks when he gives testimony to his conversion from being a Hindu to a Roman Catholic. Explaining how his journey as a teenager to Catholicism began, Jindal has said, “I was touched by the love and simplicity of a Christian girl [whom Jindal was dating in high school] who dreamt of becoming a Supreme Court justice so she could stop her country from ‘killing unborn babies,’” referring to abortion.

“Jindal is one of the smartest guys in any governor’s office or in politics,” Dave Keene, former chairman of the American Conservative Union, tells me. “He is totally qualified to be vice president.”

Rush Limbaugh refers to Jindal as the “next Ronald Reagan.”

While Jindal may not move a major demographic, the presence of a non-white on the Romney ticket would signal that Republicans are inclusive.

Former Mississippi Gov. Barbour remembers that when Bill Clinton first ran for president, people said the only thing they knew about him was that he gave a terrible speech at the Democratic convention in 1988. In the end, says Barbour, “that didn’t turn out to be the only thing they knew about him. The same is true with Bobby.”

Ronald Kessler is chief Washington correspondent of Newsmax.com. He is the New York Times bestselling author of books on the Secret Service, FBI, and CIA.

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/jindal-romney-vice-president/2012/06/06/id/441401

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #86 on: June 06, 2012, 11:46:13 AM »
why pick rubio?   He supports obama's DREAM act.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #87 on: June 06, 2012, 11:56:09 AM »
why pick rubio?   He supports obama's DREAM act.

 ::)


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #88 on: June 06, 2012, 12:26:03 PM »

 Rubio defends scaled-back DREAM Act, says it addresses ‘humanitarian issue’


Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio on Sunday defended his plan to develop a scaled-back version of the DREAM Act, arguing that his proposal represents not amnesty, but an effort to tackle the “humanitarian issue” of undocumented immigrants who were brought to the country as children.

 
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.). (AFP PHOTO/Jewel Samad/AFP/GettyImages) In an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” Rubio said that his proposal, which is in the works, would provide not a “special pathway” to citizenship for young people in the country illegally but rather a non-immigrant visa that would allow those people to serve in the military or attend college and then later apply for citizenship through the traditional route.

Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, has yet to state a position on Rubio’s plan, and Rubio said Sunday that he did not expect Romney to weigh in on the proposal because it has yet to be finalized.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/rubio-defends-scaled-back-dream-act-says-it-addresses-humanitarian-issue/2012/05/06/gIQArB8r5T_blog.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #89 on: June 06, 2012, 12:40:03 PM »

 Rubio defends scaled-back DREAM Act, says it addresses ‘humanitarian issue’


Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio on Sunday defended his plan to develop a scaled-back version of the DREAM Act, arguing that his proposal represents not amnesty, but an effort to tackle the “humanitarian issue” of undocumented immigrants who were brought to the country as children.

 
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.). (AFP PHOTO/Jewel Samad/AFP/GettyImages) In an interview on “Fox News Sunday,” Rubio said that his proposal, which is in the works, would provide not a “special pathway” to citizenship for young people in the country illegally but rather a non-immigrant visa that would allow those people to serve in the military or attend college and then later apply for citizenship through the traditional route.

Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, has yet to state a position on Rubio’s plan, and Rubio said Sunday that he did not expect Romney to weigh in on the proposal because it has yet to be finalized.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/rubio-defends-scaled-back-dream-act-says-it-addresses-humanitarian-issue/2012/05/06/gIQArB8r5T_blog.html

Quote
why pick rubio?   He supports obama's DREAM act.

Do you ever tell the truth?   ::)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #90 on: June 06, 2012, 12:42:33 PM »


Do you ever tell the truth?   ::)

Its sad isnt it?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #91 on: June 06, 2012, 12:52:29 PM »
sad that 'conservatives' would back any candidate who wants to let all the illegals stay? 

i agree.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #92 on: June 06, 2012, 12:54:39 PM »
sad that 'conservatives' would back any candidate who wants to let all the illegals stay? 

i agree.


Bro - you have kneepadded a communist for the last 3 years.   You are not in a position to be casting aspersions. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #93 on: June 06, 2012, 12:58:09 PM »

Bro - you have kneepadded a communist for the last 3 years.   You are not in a position to be casting aspersions. 

im a kneepadder, whatever - but i sure as fck don't support letting all those illegals stay.

RUBIO DOES!

You can reconcile that any way you pleace.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #94 on: June 06, 2012, 01:14:54 PM »
sad that 'conservatives' would back any candidate who wants to let all the illegals stay? 

i agree.

Can't keep the lies straight.  You voted for Bob Barr in 2008, and he supports amnesty. 

Did Bob Barr swipe his immigration policy from Barack Obama (or Bush, McCain, Clinton,...)?

Libertarian Party contender for president Bob Barr was interviewed by Neal Boortz a few days ago, and the audio and a partial transcript is here. Part of the conversation involved immigration matters, and based on that I have trouble seeing any major difference between Barr's positions and those of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John McCain, George Bush, Teddy Kennedy, and on down the line. In fact, it's like his campaign was the recipient of a blank cardboard box with just the word "POLICY" stenciled on it.

On the audio, he implies that he supports a form of amnesty where illegal aliens who are caught in the interior, as long as they passed a background check, would get to remain. He doesn't specify whether that would be as a "guest" worker or whether they'd get on the "path to citizenship". Asked about this, he says:

"I think as a practical matter, that makes a lot of sense. I'm not sure how you would go about rounding up millions of people and trying to deport them. The key here is security..."

Now, compare that to BHO:

"We are not going to send [illegal aliens] home... I want us to have an honest conversation about this." ...Mr. Obama said many illegals have "settled," "bought property" and have children who are U.S. citizens. He said the country would have to devote "all our law enforcement resources to rounding up people without papers, even if they weren't causing any trouble," and once that's done, the country would have to "empty out our jails..." ..."Imagine what that would look like, basically detaining, putting in jail 12 million people. We're not going to do that..."

And, in fact, all of those listed above have made similar arguments. And, all of those arguments are wrong: they offer a false choice and fail to note other alternatives such as attrition. Under that plan we'd enforce the laws now and reduce non-emergency benefits to illegal aliens, causing many to leave voluntarily. Neither an amnesty nor mass deportations would be required.

Barr also said that neither the Dems nor the GOP are making border security a priority. To a large extent that's false, since the leaders of both parties supported "comprehensive immigration reform" and all three major candidates support some form of border enforcement, or at least pretend to.

As a political matter, Barr's position makes little sense (unless there's "something else" involved). He doesn't seem to have an ideological standpoint on this issue, and aside from using them to get the nomination there's little reason for him to reach out to the extremist libertarians on this issue. On the other hand, there's nothing to differentiate him from the three major candidates on immigration, an issue that many people care about and that the vast majority of Americans would care about if someone were able to explain everything involved in this issue.

Barr is also going to face a lot of heat from the GOP; see for instance Sean Hannity's attempts to portray him as someone who'd like to make crack and heroin legal. He's going to be ferociously attacked by he has no effective way to fight back against McCain. McCain's weakest point is immigration, yet he can't attack him on that issue since their positions are basically the same.

If Barr saw the light and decided to very aggressively go after all three major candidates on this issue he could have a very powerful impact on the presidential race. He'd have to explain everything involved, including topics that are frequently ignored such as the political power that foreign governments have been able to obtain inside the U.S. and the fact that illegal immigration is an indicator of political corruption. He'd also have to deflect attacks from those who support illegal activity, but that really isn't that difficult. And, he'd have to aggressively attack his opponents on this issue such as by sending his representatives to their campaign events to ask them embarrassing questions designed to point out the hugely obvious flaws in their policies and designed to discredit them.

However, based on what I've seen so far it looks like Barr isn't going to run an "insurgent" campaign but simply one designed with other goals in mind.

5/17/08 UPDATE: Barr appeared on the Glenn Beck show a few days ago and continued to sound as sleazy and misleading as his opponents as well as other hacks who support massive and/or illegal immigration. Asked whether he'd "ship [illegal aliens] home or not", Barr said:

When you find them, you ship them home, absolutely.

What Barr forgot to mention was that, based on what he's said earlier, that would only occur after having granted an amnesty, and he's only referring to those who came after the amnesty or those who didn't take part in the amnesty. He then said that he'd fine employers and was asked about the border fence. He said he wouldn't build it:

First of all, I think it would be terribly costly. And whatever border fence you build, people are going to find a way to get around it, go under it, go over it, somehow... I think it would look absolutely awful. And even though it`s a fence to keep people from coming in, as opposed to the Berlin wall, it gives the same impression. Not the impression I want to give the world about America.

Needless to say, it's not difficult to find other hacks saying something almost identical to that.

http://24ahead.com/blog/archives/007625.html

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #95 on: June 06, 2012, 01:18:43 PM »
 :o

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #96 on: June 06, 2012, 05:30:34 PM »
Daniels 'Pretty Sure' He’s not Being Vetted for VP
Wednesday, 06 Jun 2012
Newsmax Wires

Indiana GOP Gov. Mitch Daniels, who has been mentioned as a possible running mate for presidential nominee Mitt Romney, says he’s “pretty sure” he’s not being considered for the slot.

Asked by Bret Baier of Fox News how he knows that he’s not on Romney’s short list, Daniels responded, “Let's just say that I have strong confidence that the nation will not face that problem,” according to The Hill.

Baier followed up, “So you're not being vetted?” Daniels’ response: “Well, you wouldn't know if you were, but I'm pretty sure no.”

Daniels reiterated his call for a truce on social issues in the interview, a stance that may not endear him to the conservatives Romney must inspire to win the election.

“I think when we've got an emergency [the country’s debt burden] that threatens us all — rich, poor, across every boundary that might otherwise divide us, we ought to concentrate on that,” he said. “That’s our common enemy, therefore our common opportunity . . . We ought not let other honest disagreements get in the way until we've dealt with that.”

When Baier asked whether that stance will hurt his chances of becoming Romney’s running mate, Daniels said, "Well, fortunately for us all, we're never going to know . . . That's not going to happen — the national ticket you hypothesize."

Daniels sees a chance for a bipartisan agreement on tax reform. “Tax reform is very exciting to me because many Democrats agree,” he said. “Lower rates, along with fewer loopholes and exemptions, have been proven as a job creation strategy.”

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/daniels-romney-vice-president/2012/06/06/id/441391

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #97 on: June 08, 2012, 06:44:51 PM »
I think it's a three horse race between Portman, Rubio, and Christi.


CPAC attendees prop up Rubio as other potential VPs audition
Posted by
CNN Political Reporter Shannon Travis

Rosemont, Illinois (CNN) - Marco Rubio has repeatedly pushed back against talk of becoming Mitt Romney's running mate. The Florida senator has previously said, "I'm not going to be the vice president," and in another instance suggested former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush for the job.

Despite that, Rubio's name consistently percolates near the top of many potential VP lists.

The latest came on Friday evening, as Rubio won the vice presidential straw poll at the Conservative Political Action Conference near Chicago.

Rubio did not attend the gathering. Yet his tea party street cred and youth have made the senator a popular figure in the conservative movement. Republicans also point to his being Hispanic and from the battleground state of Florida as reasons to put Rubio on the GOP ticket.

Not all conservatives think Rubio should, or will, get the nod. Critics point to his relative lack of national experience as a reason that Romney should pass him over. Others say he's never faced the rigorous public vetting in a national campaign.

The CPAC VP straw poll likely means relatively little in the actual vice presidential selection process. However, it'll surely loom large in the guessing game.

Five other potential running mates attended the overwhelmingly conservative-friendly event: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania and Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.

Each of them appeared to be in full-on VP audition mode, mounting harsh political attacks against the president.

Christie used both humor and policy swipes.

"When I landed here today in Chicago, I stopped in the airport for a minute because I heard the president was going to speak on the economy," Christie said. "I said I've got 10 minutes to waste, why not?"

The governor added: "Barack Obama's leadership is driving this business, the USA, towards a fiscal cliff. We better stand together in the next five months and stop him from doing it."

Paul called the president, "the great speech maker in chief" and accused him of "taking the last year and a half of his presidency to campaign."

In a post-speech interview with CNN, the Kentucky senator said it would be "an honor" to be considered for Romney's VP.

And the Louisiana governor followed many speakers in a sort of pep rally over Gov. Scott Walker's recall survival in Wisconsin. Jindal swiped at the president's absence in Wisconsin in the final days of the recall.

"There are many reasons maybe [Pres. Obama] didn't want to come to Wisconsin," Jindal said. "Did he not go to Wisconsin because maybe he thought he wouldn't be an asset?"

Other speakers – such as former presidential candidates Herman Cain and Michele Bachmann – also spoke.

Santorum's speech came as he emerged from a stretch of public silence to preview his political future. But on the same day that he announced the formation of a political committee and pledged to campaign for Romney, Santorum also detailed a "dual mission" of keeping Romney's feet to the fire on conservative issues.

The gathering – the first of two regional Conservative Political Action Conference events expected this year – happened in President Barack Obama's home state. The site was just a short trip from the president's downtown Chicago re-election operation.

"Conservatives take back the Midwest," blared the headline on a promotional flier that also said attendees would "take the fight for the future of America directly to President Barack Obama's backyard!"

And yet, conservatives face an uphill climb to make sweeping gains in the Midwest. According to CNN's analysis of the electoral landscape, Illinois is reliably Obama territory; and Wisconsin and Michigan both favor the president. Iowa and Ohio – two states Obama won in 2008 – are toss-ups. Only Missouri and Indiana are listed as leaning Romney.

The event was sponsored by the American Conservative Union. Thousands of conservatives attend CPAC's annual gathering in Washington D.C. Moving the event to Chicago is only the group's "second-ever regional event," organizers said in a news release.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/06/08/rubio-wins-cpac-vp-straw-poll/?hpt=hp_t2

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66495
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #98 on: June 11, 2012, 03:49:09 PM »
Thune a sleeper pick?  I doubt it, but Bush won with someone from a small too.

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/thune-romney-vice-president/2012/06/11/id/441874

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 2012 Vice President Candidates
« Reply #99 on: June 11, 2012, 04:21:15 PM »
Thune a sleeper pick?  I doubt it, but Bush won with someone from a small too.

http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/thune-romney-vice-president/2012/06/11/id/441874


THune would be a MUCH safer pick than an angry fat Christie, or a truth-stretching, DREAM-supporting Rubio.

He's about as conservative as you can get.  No military or huge foreign policy, VERY good on energy and will be a SAFE pick.  No flubs, no gotcha Qs... dude was bosn in 1961, won't embarass romney, won't be a wildcard.