Author Topic: Sandusky trial  (Read 2769 times)

njanvi

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 829
Sandusky trial
« on: June 12, 2012, 03:21:16 PM »
Testimony is sickening. He should be put to death!!
How sick are the others who covered for him??? Yes, Paterno included!!!

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2012, 03:22:26 PM »
the wife should be charged as well

njanvi

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 829
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2012, 03:23:36 PM »
Along with just about the entire Penn State administration at the time...how do these people look themselves in the mirror?

Nails

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 36504
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jsi5VTzJpPw
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2012, 03:27:33 PM »

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19661
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2012, 03:34:44 PM »
Testimony is sickening. He should be put to death!!
How sick are the others who covered for him??? Yes, Paterno included!!!

He should not be put to death!  That should never happen in a civilized society.  Having said that, his life is over.  There is no way he could be found anything but guilty. His defense team is grasping at straws--to put it mildly.  Lord knows I would not want to be part of that team of counselors; not even Johnny Cochran could do it!

Jerry's wife enabled much of this over many years.  I am surprised she is not charged with something.

As for the university, I do not believe many people on campus really knew about what was going on—perhaps three or four.  Mike McQueary saw and reported what he saw, but the people he reported it to didn’t grasp the seriousness of the allegations.   :'(

njanvi

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 829
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #5 on: June 12, 2012, 03:46:59 PM »
He should not be put to death!  That should never happen in a civilized society.  Having said that, his life is over.  There is no way he could be found anything but guilty. His defense team is grasping at straws--to put it mildly.  Lord knows I would not want to be part of that team of counselors; not even Johnny Cochran could do it!

Jerry's wife enabled much of this over many years.  I am surprised she is not charged with something.

As for the university, I do not believe many people on campus really knew about what was going on—perhaps three or four.  Mike McQueary saw and reported what he saw, but the people he reported it to didn’t grasp the seriousness of the allegations.   :'(


He reported seeing a grown man butt f***ing a little boy in the shower.....how can they not grasp the seriousness  ???

delta9mda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7365
  • Team Pussy Claad/ ya know I'm sayin?
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2012, 04:15:59 PM »
he will commit suicide

gracie bjj

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7101
  • Getbig!
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2012, 04:18:05 PM »
its ashame a man would do that to kids, those kids are gonna remember that shit forever and might end up needing counseling or meds.any man thats sexually assaults a kid should go to jail and get raped by my old celly bubba,  >:(
R

njanvi

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 829
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2012, 04:19:08 PM »
he will commit suicide

I am amazed someone hasn't taken him out yet

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19661
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #9 on: June 12, 2012, 04:29:54 PM »
He reported seeing a grown man butt f***ing a little boy in the shower.....how can they not grasp the seriousness  ???

"Fucking" becomes, "fucking around" becomes "something inappropriate" becomes "horseplay", becomes, etc. People often hear what they want to hear (given the stakes).  There have been several articles about this phenomenon since this story broke.

njanvi

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 829
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #10 on: June 12, 2012, 04:33:33 PM »
"Fucking" becomes, "fucking around" becomes "something inappropriate" becomes "horseplay", becomes, etc. People often hear what they want to hear (given the stakes).  There have been several articles about this phenomenon since this story broke.

They chose to hear what they wanted to hear because theyre all a bunch of sick fuckers who were ok with a grown man butt f****ing kids as long as they kept getting paid, Paterno included

bike nut

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • Desperation is a stinky cologne
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #11 on: June 12, 2012, 07:08:40 PM »
"Wes" offered me a "Jerry Sandusky" once in a PM.

I told him I'd accept, if he'd let me dress up like Runningmom, get a fake unicorn tattoo on my chest, and shout out Mike Arvilla's name during the act.

Hey Wes...I never heard back from you if it's a "go" or not? ;D

Heywood

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1396
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #12 on: June 12, 2012, 07:19:10 PM »
He should be hung by the neck till dead.

They did this to horse thieves and cattle rustlers about 150 years ago.

This seems a mite worse.



Irongrip400

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22313
  • Pan Germanism, Pax Britannica
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #13 on: June 12, 2012, 07:22:28 PM »
Dudes like him should be put in front of the "pig mini gun". Tortured. Where's Himmler when you need him?

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #14 on: June 12, 2012, 09:27:27 PM »
He reported seeing a grown man butt f***ing a little boy in the shower.....how can they not grasp the seriousness  ???

Thank you.  They fully grasped everything- especially the fact that acknowledging a pedophile and rapist is part of your faculty, and how that MIGHT affect your multi-million dollar football program.
a

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31841
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #15 on: June 13, 2012, 07:17:12 AM »
He should not be put to death!  That should never happen in a civilized society.  Having said that, his life is over.  There is no way he could be found anything but guilty. His defense team is grasping at straws--to put it mildly.  Lord knows I would not want to be part of that team of counselors; not even Johnny Cochran could do it!

Jerry's wife enabled much of this over many years.  I am surprised she is not charged with something.

As for the university, I do not believe many people on campus really knew about what was going on—perhaps three or four.  Mike McQueary saw and reported what he saw, but the people he reported it to didn’t grasp the seriousness of the allegations.   :'(


The fact is Bay he showed he cannot live in a civilized society and thus shouldn't continue living in it.

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42486
  • Getbig!
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #16 on: June 13, 2012, 07:32:13 AM »
 :(   the trial sickens me what two consenting adults do who gives a crap ,but doing this to children. how can the asshole sit there with a straight face guy is emotionless. when questioned before he died paterno said he didn't understand he never heard about sex between two men.
F

njanvi

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 829
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #17 on: June 13, 2012, 03:00:19 PM »
:(   the trial sickens me what two consenting adults do who gives a crap ,but doing this to children. how can the asshole sit there with a straight face guy is emotionless. when questioned before he died paterno said he didn't understand he never heard about sex between two men.

Paterno is very culpable for allowing this to go on after he found out.
His supporters can spin it however they want, but he chose his program and legacy over these kids, sickening!!

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2012, 05:33:34 AM »
that dude is sick.  Beyond sick.

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42486
  • Getbig!
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #19 on: June 15, 2012, 12:59:04 PM »
 >:( gives new meaning to jerry's kids a bad meaning.
F

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #20 on: June 15, 2012, 02:43:28 PM »
>:( gives new meaning to jerry's kids a bad meaning.
Guy was, what, 69 before he was nailed? Sad.    :-\

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42486
  • Getbig!
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #21 on: June 16, 2012, 01:24:42 PM »
latest is they expect sandusky's lawyers to evoke the scarlett o'hara defense.
F

Purge_WTF

  • Guest
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #22 on: June 18, 2012, 06:33:29 AM »
  Hope the faggot gets the death penalty.

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42486
  • Getbig!
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #23 on: June 22, 2012, 10:44:23 AM »
now sandusky's adopted son says he molested him too. >:( >:( >:( verdict should be reached soon.
F

funk51

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 42486
  • Getbig!
Re: Sandusky trial
« Reply #24 on: June 22, 2012, 12:03:29 PM »
as a side note one of these character witness tools testified that men and little boys shower together all the time where he's from, and that he often showered with little girls. they should have arrested this guy right there and then. >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
F