Author Topic: How on earth could Ronnie ever beat Flex?? (Read 15141 times)

affeman · « **on:** October 03, 2012, 09:48:01 PM »

Coleman with his barrel torso, toothpick arms and non-existant delts; Flex was superior to him in every way.

Shockwave · « **Reply #1 on:** October 03, 2012, 09:51:15 PM »

Probably because Ronnie didn't look anything like that when he beat Flex. Thats 05 Ronnie, not 98-99 Ronnie.

Moen · « **Reply #2 on:** October 03, 2012, 10:19:54 PM »

I have wondered about this myself as well. Flex should have always won, against everyone. Best shape ever. Even his Synthol-arms looked good.

SF1900 · « **Reply #3 on:** October 03, 2012, 10:22:02 PM »

bc flex never looked like this

Moen · « **Reply #4 on:** October 03, 2012, 10:34:34 PM »

Quote from: SF1900 on October 03, 2012, 10:22:02 PM

bc flex never looked like this

Ronnie looked better with a tanktop hiding his massive midsection. He should never have won anything with his preggo-look

SF1900 · « **Reply #5 on:** October 03, 2012, 11:02:16 PM »

Quote from: Moen on October 03, 2012, 10:34:34 PM

Ronnie looked better with a tanktop hiding his massive midsection. He should never have won anything with his preggo-look

Or flex with his obvious oil filled parts

Moen · « **Reply #6 on:** October 03, 2012, 11:05:37 PM »

I prefer oil over babies

POB · « **Reply #7 on:** October 03, 2012, 11:13:52 PM »

Quote from: Moen on October 03, 2012, 11:05:37 PM

oil over babies

You just coined a new tshirt line

SF1900 · « **Reply #8 on:** October 03, 2012, 11:18:40 PM »

Quote from: Moen on October 03, 2012, 11:05:37 PM

I prefer oil over babies

Not me. At least that gut is "natural"

Nothing more fake than synthol.

Bevo · « **Reply #9 on:** October 03, 2012, 11:39:15 PM »

Quote from: Moen on October 03, 2012, 10:19:54 PM

I have wondered about this myself as well. Flex should have always won, against everyone. Best shape ever. Even his Synthol-arms looked good.

If shape was the only criteria then beyeke, curry, Rhoden, Cedric, should have all won.... But they won't

Emmortal · « **Reply #10 on:** October 03, 2012, 11:43:37 PM »

Quote from: SF1900 on October 03, 2012, 11:18:40 PM

Nothing more fake than synthol.

Or overly developed muscles from steroids

bigjim · « **Reply #11 on:** October 04, 2012, 12:33:58 AM »

Quote from: Emmortal on October 03, 2012, 11:43:37 PM

Or overly developed muscles from steroids

Muscles are muscles at the end of the day. flexes oil in my eyes is equivilent to getting calf implants.

hipolito mejia · « **Reply #12 on:** October 04, 2012, 04:21:02 AM »

One word TORSO.

Radical Plato · « **Reply #13 on:** October 04, 2012, 04:33:40 AM »

That's easy, Flex was a midget in comparison to Ronnie. It's like comparing a boy to a man. And while were offering up overtly biased comparisons, how about this one.

Pet shop boys · « **Reply #14 on:** October 04, 2012, 04:43:48 AM »

There is not a single pose where Flex looks superior than Ronnie...specially during 98-2000 years.

Flex is not even in the all time top 5.

Ronnie is the best of all time .

WOOOSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Karpaasi · « **Reply #15 on:** October 04, 2012, 04:45:46 AM »

I've always thought Flex looked great in 1999. If I recall Flex was over 240+ lbs at the O which was huge increase in weight in one year. Flex could hold his own against Ronnie in certain poses but Big Ron was just way too much. When they hit rear lat spread everyone could see who's the champ.

DroppingPlates · « **Reply #16 on:** October 04, 2012, 04:45:48 AM »

Quote from: affeman on October 03, 2012, 09:48:01 PM

Coleman with his barrel torso, toothpick arms and non-existant delts; Flex was superior to him in every way.

I can't take your observations serious, go find another hobby

Papper · « **Reply #17 on:** October 04, 2012, 05:02:43 AM »

Agree that synthol is ridiculous. Every step from a natural physique is less real bodybuilding in my eyes.

The only thing more fake that synthol i can think of is putting on a rubber suit and pretending it's muscles

supernick · « **Reply #18 on:** October 04, 2012, 05:03:15 AM »

ha toothpick arms

Jaime · « **Reply #19 on:** October 04, 2012, 05:31:52 AM »

They are both overrated. They both have clear structural problems. Going on judging criteria Ronnie had Flex every time.

Dr Dutch · « **Reply #20 on:** October 04, 2012, 01:07:42 PM »

Because Ronnie looked STRONG, like a Mr O should. Flex looked like an assembled piece of blown-up individual bodyparts. Flex should never have placed in a Mr O posedown.

So says Dr Dutch

affeman · « **Reply #21 on:** October 04, 2012, 01:23:32 PM »

Quote from: supernick on October 04, 2012, 05:03:15 AM

ha toothpick arms

Ronnies arms were way too small for his torso, especially in later years. Ask any expert.

Jadeveon Clowney · « **Reply #22 on:** October 04, 2012, 01:31:42 PM »

Quote from: affeman on October 04, 2012, 01:23:32 PM

Ronnies arms were way too small for his torso, especially in later years. Ask any expert.

I'm the expert: you're wrong.

affeman · « **Reply #23 on:** October 04, 2012, 01:36:35 PM »

Quote from: Jadeveon Clowney on October 04, 2012, 01:31:42 PM

I'm the expert: you're wrong.

affeman · « **Reply #24 on:** October 04, 2012, 01:37:26 PM »

Flex destroyed him on arms and delts anyway, even in earlier years.