Holy Sh*t Obama

[blacken700]

Still talking to yourself, ID Crisis Boy......and putting your foot in your mouth, just as you did, claiming that there were no complaints from Democrats about the moderator of the first debate and that I simply got that from Hannity.

Keep it up. It shows shows how utterly stupid you sound, no matter which gimmick you use.

why don't you post where i said that,maybe the talking snake told you    about time for hannity to come on and inform you of your world views    priceless

[SLYY]

Producing & burning for energy are two different things!

Would you want to live within 30 miles of one of the "filthy five"?

Princess,

You have spent years on getbig developing credibility.  Don't throw it all away by speaking on matters that you have zero knowledge. 

Now, I will openly bait you here: ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT OBAMA IS AGAINST BURNING CLEAN ENERGY?
To help you in this discussion, the answer is a CLEAR "no."  Based on that, Romney came to the second debate and told America that Obama's regulations are burying the coal industry (as evidenced by the debate itself and reiterated numerous times by my quotes above).


However, while governor, Romney supported new regulations to reduce power plant emission "as he made clear repeatedly."  Romney was adamant that a particular coal plant abide by the regulations he repeatedly supported; as a result, Romney appeared at a press conference near the coal plant to emphasize his demand that the plant abide by the regulations he repeatedly supported.  Finally, Romney shut the coal plant down due to the plant not abiding by the regulations he repeatedly supported and stated "that plant kills!"  Now, Romney is going to condemn Obama for having regulations in place for coal plants??!!  





Romnesia???

[SLYY]

Admit it!  Obama is spewing BS on that issue!   You can't possibly agree with everything he says.

Again Princess, you have spent way too long on getbig building credibility...to make such an illogical rebuttal.

I used 565 words, backed with credible citations to definitively dismantle your argument that Obama completely misrepresented Romney's "Romnesia" regarding the coal industry.  And...your rebuttal is, "Admit it!  Obama is spewing BS on that issue!"?  Really?


You are better than that Princess. 

[Princess L]

Princess,

You have spent years on getbig developing credibility. Don't throw it all away by speaking on matters that you have zero knowledge.  

Now, I will openly bait you here: ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT OBAMA IS AGAINST BURNING CLEAN ENERGY?
To help you in this discussion, the answer is a CLEAR "no."  Based on that, Romney came to the second debate and told America that Obama's regulations are burying the coal industry (as evidenced by the debate itself and reiterated numerous times by my quotes above).


However, while governor, Romney supported new regulations to reduce power plant emission "as he made clear repeatedly."  Romney was adamant that a particular coal plant abide by the regulations he repeatedly supported; as a result, Romney appeared at a press conference near the coal plant to emphasize his demand that the plant abide by the regulations he repeatedly supported.  Finally, Romney shut the coal plant down due to the plant not abiding by the regulations he repeatedly supported and stated "that plant kills!"  Now, Romney is going to condemn Obama for having regulations in place for coal plants??!!  

Haven't you heard?  
Getbig is dead!
 

And no, I am not suggesting Obama is AGAINST burning clean energy.  The regulations (with ref to the "filthy five") were put into place long before Obama, yet he continues to use a ~9 year old video (and what it's content meant) against Romney.  You didn't answer the question.  Would you want to live near one of them (as they were)?  

[Princess L]

Again Princess, you have spent way too long on getbig building credibility...to make such an illogical rebuttal.

I used 565 words, backed with credible citations to definitively dismantle your argument that Obama completely misrepresented Romney's "Romnesia" regarding the coal industry.  And...your rebuttal is, "Admit it!  Obama is spewing BS on that issue!"?  Really?


You are better than that Princess. 

Yes I am Mr. Galacowitz!

I need a break (and 2 Excedrin) before going to listen to another screaming liberal (Jackson Browne) 

[SLYY]

Haven't you heard? 
Getbig is dead!
 

 

And no, I am not suggesting Obama is AGAINST burning clean energy.  The regulations (with ref to the "filthy five") were put into place long before Obama, yet he continues to use a ~9 year old video (and what it's content meant) against Romney. 

When did Obama use Romney's own stance and actions as governor regarding coal plants against Romney?  AFTER Romney attacked Obama in the second debate by saying:

"But what we don't need is to have the president keeping us from taking advantage of oil, coal and gas. This has not been Mr. Oil, or Mr. Gas, or Mr. Coal."

The one example where Romney acted as a governmental president (governor of MA)...Romney kept coal plants from taking advantage of coal.  Romney was NOT Mr. Coal when it was his turn to act as a governmental president.  There is no better example for Obama to reference then when Romney was the governor of Massachusetts.  That, Princess, is WHY Obama used that example and why it is so fitting. 

You didn't answer the question.  Would you want to live near one of them (as they were)? 

I would not live near the "clean five," let alone the "filthy five."  I found Romney's action's regarding the coal plants extremely commendable.  What I find inconceivable is how Romney contradicted his meritorious coal plant record (you know...enforcing regulations that he supported and shutting coal plants down) by insulting Obama for his regulations on coal plants.



Romnesia???

[SLYY]

Yes I am Mr. Galacowitz!

You mean, DOCTOR Galacowitz...