Author Topic: BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZIIIIIIIIII  (Read 2499 times)

mogulgangi

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1119
  • fitness celebrity
Re: BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZIIIIIIIIII
« Reply #25 on: November 07, 2012, 06:04:27 PM »
HAHAHAHAH

At least we don`t have to hear about that bullshit anymore.

Adonis, your a piece of shit liberal who is afraid to be in the real world..pussy computer bitach..hope you realize a navy seal died..a navy seal death is unlike any death in the armed forces..a death of a navy seal because of no help takes a huge hit around the forces and doesn't sit we'll with soldiers..soldiers are screening for answers..this is going to get huge..republicans are gonna blow this story out when it develops to get back at the savior and its food stampers 


a_ahmed

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5823
  • Team Nasser
Re: BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZIIIIIIIIII
« Reply #26 on: November 07, 2012, 06:06:55 PM »
Dead Americans under Bush = try him for war crimes.

Dead Americans under Obama = it's ok, bro, was only 4 (including our ambassador) in this incident.


Funny how Americans lives are worth more under Bush than Obama. These drones would have been the first ones getting machine-gunned in the Khmer Rouge's killing fields.

No actually Bush is wanted for war crimes for torture, being responsible for starting two wars that resulted in a million deaths. Occupation, invasion of sovereign nations, lies, deceit.

Obama just continued his legacy.

America gets away with murder

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50255
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZIIIIIIIIII
« Reply #27 on: November 07, 2012, 07:32:15 PM »
Adonis, your a piece of shit liberal who is afraid to be in the real world..pussy computer bitach..hope you realize a navy seal died..a navy seal death is unlike any death in the armed forces..a death of a navy seal because of no help takes a huge hit around the forces and doesn't sit we'll with soldiers..soldiers are screening for answers..this is going to get huge..republicans are gonna blow this story out when it develops to get back at the savior and its food stampers 


By your logic, Ronald Reagan must be the largest piece for doing NOTHING when 241 American Soldiers were killed when they drove two truck bombs into the military barracks in Beirut.  What did Reagan do?  He did nothing but cut and run. 

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZIIIIIIIIII
« Reply #28 on: November 07, 2012, 07:58:43 PM »
Reagan didn't want to pull out...he was forced by his folks. Right or wrong it doesn't matter.......historicall y you can blame the loss and subsequent haze after we left vietnam...regardless Obama did nothing correct in Libya. He did not lead...he failed....he fails every day and you idiots gave him 4 more years of failure. The country is now a majority of takers. We're becoming a minority controlled 3rd world shithole.....good job douchbags.
L

garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZIIIIIIIIII
« Reply #29 on: November 07, 2012, 09:23:44 PM »
Reagan didn't want to pull out...he was forced by his folks. Right or wrong it doesn't matter.......historicall y you can blame the loss and subsequent haze after we left vietnam...regardless Obama did nothing correct in Libya. He did not lead...he failed....he fails every day and you idiots gave him 4 more years of failure. The country is now a majority of takers. We're becoming a minority controlled 3rd world shithole.....good job douchbags.
Oh, brother.
G

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZIIIIIIIIII
« Reply #30 on: November 07, 2012, 09:30:18 PM »
Dead Americans are dead Americans. It's funny how they're worth a little less when they die on Obama's watch, though. The sheeple are too comical.  ;)



Shame. They would have been alive had Obama not interjected us into an illegal war for Libya's oil.
you dont remember how the vast majority of republicans were calling for Obama to send military aid to the libyan rebels for months before Obama finally decided to do it?

do you know that the liberal base was angered by Obama's actions and that there was no political upside for Obama's behavior?

do you know that the arab league had requested united states military support of the libyan rebels, which was an absolutely monumental step towards better relations with the middle east?

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63713
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZIIIIIIIIII
« Reply #31 on: November 08, 2012, 11:25:33 AM »
Somebody let Congress know this issue is over. 

House panel invites Clinton to testify at Libya hearing
Published November 08, 2012
FoxNews.com

The House Foreign Affairs Committee has scheduled an open hearing for next Thursday on the Libya terror attack and has invited Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to testify, Fox News has learned.

The committee joins two others planning to hold hearings, albeit closed ones, that day.

Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on the consulate in Benghazi. A local Libyan extremist group is suspected of carrying out the attack, but the Obama administration has been criticized for its confusing explanation for the strike and for security warnings that apparently weren't heeded.

The House Intelligence Committee will hold its closed hearing on the attack on Nov. 15, Fox News has learned. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, CIA Director David Petraeus and Matt Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, are expected to testify.

The Senate Intelligence Committee plans to meet the same day to discuss the Libya attack -- that hearing will also be closed to the public.

Olsen was the first member of the Obama administration to publicly describe the Libya assault explicitly as a "terrorist attack," at a hearing more than a week after the attack, though Obama had spoken earlier more generally about the U.S. response to "acts of terror."

Republicans, who control the House, have accused Obama officials of downplaying the attack's terrorist nature to maintain an administration narrative that Al Qaeda is on the run. Officials initially suggested an anti-Islam video produced in the United States had motivated the attack, which U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice said five days later appeared to be "spontaneous" violence after a protest escalated.

But further investigation revealed no protest outside the consulate on the night of the attack, and the attackers are thought to be members of Ansar al-Sharia, a group that isn't directly affiliated with Al Qaeda but sympathizes with its anti-Western goals. It remains unclear how long the attackers had been planning their strike and whether they were motivated by outrage over the video.

The Obama administration also has faced questions about why it didn't do more to protect the consulate and the ambassador, especially in light of evidence that requests earlier this year for security improvements either were denied or never followed up on.

Other evidence suggests U.S. officials were aware in the days before the attack that extremists were a growing threat in Libya and that the consulate could not withstand a coordinated attack.

Obama has vowed that his administration will do whatever it takes to bring the attackers to justice, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has taken responsibility for any security failures, though she also has cautioned that a full investigation of the attack remains under way.

The FBI only last week was granted access by Tunisia to one of the suspected attackers, who is being held in the country after his arrest at an airport in Turkey shortly after the Libya attack.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/07/house-panel-to-hold-hearing-on-libya-attack-with-top-obama-intelligence/