this one ?
Revenue @ 1000
COGS @ 100
OE @ 100
NI @ 800
Revenue @ 1000
COGS @ 100
OE @ 80
NI @ 820
If I want to make 820 assuming OE @ 100 I need 1020 in revenue
I'm not sure what %'s you think are important
I still need 20 more in revenue if I want to make 820 while keeping OE @ 100
20 more in revenue or 20 less in OE gives me the same bottom line
Sorry it took me so long to respond, Ive been in Brazil for the past 2 weeks or so.
Yes that one, maybe I should have explained although I didnt think I needed to as youre in finance but you didnt keep the same gross margin as the original I/S. You see you have to exert extra effort in order to get that revenue. We could assume that the gross margin may decrease a little but I would imagine it would stay pretty close to the same. Ill explain a little more as you probably dont understand. The COGS will rise in order to keep the same gross profit % which is (Revenue-COGS). People arent just going to give you extra money without you having to do extra to gain it.
So lets say the gross margin stays the same:
Original I/S:
Revenue @ 1000
COGS @ 100
OE @ 100
NI @ 800
With a reduction in expenses:
Revenue @ 1000
COGS @ 100
OE @ 80
NI @ 820With an increase in revenue(including the corresponding increase in COGS to remain at 10% gross margin):
Revenue @ 1020
COGS @ 102
OE @ 100
NI @ 818Now notice the net income from an increase in revenue is lower. It may seem marginal now but we are using a revenue number of only 1000. Imagine using a revenue number of a couple trillion...
You see cost reduction does more for the bottom line than revenue increases.
If you can seriously sit there and tell me that there isnt a butt load of money that can be cut from both rep and dem causes I will gladly jump on board with raising taxes.
BUT if you cant you really need to rethink youre viewpoints.