magikusar
Time Out
Getbig IV
Posts: 2830
Team Ayn Rand
|
 |
« on: November 14, 2012, 02:46:22 AM » |
|
Hollywood do not mix chick flik with macho flik, you will only further piss men off and drive them to videogames.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1 Klaus fan
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2012, 04:48:08 AM » |
|
Hollywood? It's a British film mate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dr.chimps
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2012, 04:57:50 AM » |
|
1st act was stunning. 2nd and 3rd not so much. Still a solid flick - a give-them-what-they-want pic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CalvinH
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2012, 05:48:39 AM » |
|
1st act was stunning. 2nd and 3rd not so much. Still a solid flick - a give-them-what-they-want pic.
Thought the first was awesome.second was "Ehh".waiting for the lines to calm down a bit before I see the third. |
|
|
|
|
|
Parker
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2012, 05:51:54 AM » |
|
Hollywood do not mix chick flik with macho flik, you will only further piss men off and drive them to videogames.
Didn't you just start a tranny thread---a mix of the feminine and masculine seems to be something that you are into. |
|
|
|
|
|
mesmorph78
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2012, 06:48:45 AM » |
|
The 3rd was the best one this new bond did
|
choice is an illusion
|
|
|
|
_bruce_
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2012, 06:53:58 AM » |
|
Part 4 is said to feature a tranny suicide bomber so fasten your seat belts.
|
[
|
|
|
|
dr.chimps
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2012, 07:32:50 AM » |
|
Thought the first was awesome.second was "Ehh".waiting for the lines to calm down a bit before I see the third.
Ach. Sorry, I was referring to the new one. It's in three parts, you'll see. |
|
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2012, 08:03:53 AM » |
|
It's the weakest of the more modern Bonds. I agree that the 1/3 is still pretty good, but after that it's a very bland standard actioneer. Weak storyline too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CalvinH
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2012, 08:10:01 AM » |
|
Ach. Sorry, I was referring to the new one. It's in three parts, you'll see.
Gottcha,is it worth it to go see? |
|
|
|
|
|
Butterbean
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2012, 08:12:34 AM » |
|
do not mix chick flik with macho flik, x2 Casino Royale was a chick flick too. |
R
|
|
|
|
dr.chimps
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 14, 2012, 08:14:56 AM » |
|
Gottcha,is it worth it to go see?
Oh yeah. The first part alone carried the movie for me. Just amazing. Oh, and there's a small scene about 3\4s through where you'll be nodding your head and saying 'cool.' Don't worry, you won't miss it. |
|
|
|
|
|
El Diablo Blanco
|
|
« Reply #12 on: November 14, 2012, 08:16:48 AM » |
|
Jmes Bond died when Roger Moore took over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voice of Doom
|
|
« Reply #13 on: November 14, 2012, 08:17:09 AM » |
|
It was liking watching the Bourne Identity. Bond films are supposed to be fun...I didnt find this film to be fun. Bond is cocky arrogance, one liners, awesome toys, cool cars, hot women and amazing stunts. This one felt like a a wrap up of the other two Daniel Craig movies...like now it's officially started over and can kick some ass again. Hopefully  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CalvinH
|
|
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2012, 08:18:09 AM » |
|
x2
Casino Royale was a chick flick too.
Outed. |
|
|
|
|
|
Butterbean
|
|
« Reply #16 on: November 14, 2012, 08:19:55 AM » |
|
Outed.
 |
R
|
|
|
|
CalvinH
|
|
« Reply #17 on: November 14, 2012, 08:20:59 AM » |
|
Are there things |
|
|
|
|
daddy8ball
Getbig III
Posts: 933
Violence is not the answer. It is the question.
|
|
« Reply #18 on: November 14, 2012, 08:22:58 AM » |
|
I agree. I thought it sucked. I went to see it because it got such good reviews.
I thought it was awful and almost walked out at the end. I don't know what the critics are thinking. Long, boring, not funny, predictable, and plodding. The villian was good, but that's about it.
|
The answer is "yes".
|
|
|
|
Hulkotron
|
|
« Reply #19 on: November 14, 2012, 08:24:48 AM » |
|
1st act was stunning. 2nd and 3rd not so much. Still a solid flick - a give-them-what-they-want pic.
Yes I agree 100%, saw it last night. |
|
|
|
|
|
Tito24
|
|
« Reply #20 on: November 14, 2012, 08:25:36 AM » |
|
its very dissapointing james doesnt hit women anymore, at least not in the way he used to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dr.chimps
|
|
« Reply #21 on: November 14, 2012, 08:26:33 AM » |
|
I agree. I thought it sucked. I went to see it because it got such good reviews.
I thought it was awful and almost walked out at the end. I don't know what the critics are thinking. Long, boring, not funny, predictable, and plodding. The villian was good, but that's about it.
Really? Guy's a great actor, and all, and the ex-agent angle was good, but having him camp it up was the wrong way to go, I thought.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Butterbean
|
|
« Reply #22 on: November 14, 2012, 08:26:59 AM » |
|
Are there things Thing is chick flicks suk |
R
|
|
|
|
Purge_WTF
|
|
« Reply #23 on: November 14, 2012, 08:35:42 AM » |
|
I don't like Daniel Craig. Nobody will ever top Connery.
|
Psalm 23.
|
|
|
|
Jadeveon Clowney
|
|
« Reply #24 on: November 14, 2012, 08:37:35 AM » |
|
hated bardem's character... lost interest after shooting at island. went looking for coffee, then just wandered around a bit before coming back (went to see with a group)
|
|
|
|
|
|
