Author Topic: How to see Paul Dillett small??.. (Read 20723 times)

Sherief Shalaby · « **on:** November 14, 2012, 01:58:08 AM »

put him beside nasser

seriously nasser in 96 carried huge amounts of hard muscles,.. may be the biggest in the history of the sport, even bigger than markus in 2002 and of course much better in shape.. also bigger than ronnie in 2003 who was at nearly 300 pounds not as dry and hard as nasser in 96..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #1 on:** November 14, 2012, 01:59:51 AM »

flat from the side hahahhahhahhaaaa...

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #2 on:** November 14, 2012, 02:04:12 AM »

from the front it was not even close between him and the others..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #3 on:** November 14, 2012, 02:05:18 AM »

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #4 on:** November 14, 2012, 02:06:55 AM »

and from the back he held his own against 2 of the best backs in the history of the sport..

cephissus · « **Reply #5 on:** November 14, 2012, 02:12:28 AM »

uncrowned mr. o, no doubt

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #6 on:** November 14, 2012, 02:35:49 AM »

Quote from: cephissus on November 14, 2012, 02:12:28 AM

uncrowned mr. o, no doubt

X2222222222222

Bam-bam · « **Reply #7 on:** November 14, 2012, 03:40:02 AM »

nasser 96 was peak nasser for sure

Parker · « **Reply #8 on:** November 14, 2012, 04:37:37 AM »

Thing is Nasser and Dillet weighed roughly the same. And Dillet had a better shape-more aesthetically balanced. Nasser just looked like a big mound of muscle.
Also, compared to a 96 Ronnie yes he was bigger---but with the back shots, you can see that Nasser's detail stopped at mid back---and wasn't as deep as Dorian's or Ronnie's.

Also, that video has a different contrast than real life. Due to this, it makes any detail stand out and look more impressive than it is. When the reality is, the detail is not as impressive. It's an illusion.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #9 on:** November 14, 2012, 04:55:19 AM »

Quote from: Parker on November 14, 2012, 04:37:37 AM

Thing is Nasser and Dillet weighed roughly the same. And Dillet had a better shape-more aesthetically balanced. Nasser just looked like a big mound of muscle.
Also, compared to a 96 Ronnie yes he was bigger---but with the back shots, you can see that Nasser's detail stopped at mid back---and wasn't as deep as Dorian's or Ronnie's.

Also, that video has a different contrast than real life. Due to this, it makes any detail stand out and look more impressive than it is. When the reality is, the detail is not as impressive. It's an illusion.

lol at saying dillet had a better shape than nasser..

and i didn't say his back was better here than dorian or ronnie,.. i said he held his own against the 2 best backs ever..

steamboatwillie · « **Reply #10 on:** November 14, 2012, 05:11:19 AM »

Anyone in those pics would run away with the Olympia crown right now...not hating on Phil or Kai, but those guys looked a million times better back then.

Frank Clairmonte · « **Reply #11 on:** November 14, 2012, 05:49:23 AM »

Nasser el Sonbaty at his BEST - German GP 1996.

Amazing bodybuilder.

gracie bjj · « **Reply #12 on:** November 14, 2012, 05:49:55 AM »

i saw nasser back in 96 guest posing in jersey n he was prolly the most massive bodybuilder i ever seen. he was offseason weighing about 320 or so

Mr Anabolic · « **Reply #13 on:** November 14, 2012, 05:52:14 AM »

To the OP: Does Nasser shave his balls, or do you prefer to suck on them when hairy?

Parker · « **Reply #14 on:** November 14, 2012, 06:29:50 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 04:55:19 AM

lol at saying dillet had a better shape than nasser..

and i didn't say his back was better here than dorian or ronnie,.. i said he held his own against the 2 best backs ever..

Everybody knows that Dillet had a better shape than Nasser. Small waist, rounder, fuller muscles.
Nasser was just a big dude, even Milos commented on him, saying that bodybuilding was about the biggest, just weigh the person and the biggest slab of meat would win. But, it ain't all about that.

Nasser was good, but his best wasn't enough to win at Dorian's or Ronnie's best...not even Flex's best.
And that is telling.

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #15 on:** November 14, 2012, 06:40:39 AM »

why not post the video, instead of carefully selected pics, and let us see for ourselves.

Figo · « **Reply #16 on:** November 14, 2012, 08:40:36 AM »

Nasser does look huge, freaky huge

Dillet looks better except from the back

Nassers back looks better there, but not close to Yates or prime Ronnie

mass243 · « **Reply #17 on:** November 14, 2012, 08:44:46 AM »

Now that's big.

Monstah.

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #18 on:** November 14, 2012, 08:45:38 AM »

Quote from: Parker on November 14, 2012, 06:29:50 AM

Everybody knows that Dillet had a better shape than Nasser. Small waist, rounder, fuller muscles.
Nasser was just a big dude, even Milos commented on him, saying that bodybuilding was about the biggest, just weigh the person and the biggest slab of meat would win. But, it ain't all about that.

Nasser was good, but his best wasn't enough to win at Dorian's or Ronnie's best...not even Flex's best.
And that is telling.

as you yourself said in your previous post nasser and paul were the same weight and according to you now everybody knows that paul had a better shape rounder bla bla bla... so why do you think nasser was always beating him???.. in all fairness at their very best i see nasser better in all poses..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #19 on:** November 14, 2012, 08:48:05 AM »

Quote from: Groink on November 14, 2012, 06:40:39 AM

why not post the video, instead of carefully selected pics, and let us see for ourselves.

i really didnt do any selection and you can post any pic. you want from the GP 96.. nasser was really phenomenal.. as for the videos share whatever you want.. i will try to find that one of him with ronnie and levrone..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #20 on:** November 14, 2012, 08:54:24 AM »

here is the video gronk..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #21 on:** November 14, 2012, 09:12:39 AM »

Quote from: galeniko on November 14, 2012, 08:57:30 AM

paul dillet is with no doubt at all the guy who put on the most muscle at this leanness level on a human frame ever.

dillet is a tiny tiny boned man,tiny waist nasser is blocky.

dillet is a true monstrosity

had some "flaws", but definitely deserved mr olympia title more than some yates with teared of arm muscles.

to be fair the biggest i saw dillett was in 1994 and he was in a good condition.. in 96 he presented one of his best shapes but i think was a little smaller than in 94.. but nasser in 96 was CLEARLY bigger and thicker than paul from all angles and in all parts.. as for muscles shape and proportions between different parts i really see no comparison.. dillet had monstrous shoulders and arms and very good legs and calves but his torso was not the same level as his limbs.. it was not thick or wide enough to go with them..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #22 on:** November 14, 2012, 09:20:13 AM »

gronk has vanished after the video lol..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #23 on:** November 14, 2012, 09:25:26 AM »

and here we are talking about one of dillett's best but when he was not at his best like at the AC 97 he looked very flat and small beside nasser although nasser here was not as big as in 96..

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #24 on:** November 14, 2012, 09:27:57 AM »

Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on November 14, 2012, 09:20:13 AM

gronk has vanished after the video lol..

The video didn't show him against yates or nasser, just Levrone and early coleman.