|
Straw Man
|
 |
« on: December 27, 2012, 12:48:31 PM » |
|
Why are baseless personal attacks OK as long as the person being attacked is not here to defend themselves ?
what makes that kind of baseless personal attack acceptable ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
LurkerNoMore
|
|
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2012, 12:50:01 PM » |
|
Because the attackers are just pussies and whiners.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beach Bum
|
|
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2012, 12:52:41 PM » |
|
The rules are pretty clear. Everyone except Straw Man understands them. It's too bad he's having such a hard time refraining from personal attacks on the board. But he can hash this out with Ron. Moving this to the Questions board. Not Allowed: "Abusive Ad-Hominem", meaning: No insults, name calling, or personal attacks (personal meaning at other posters) what so ever or Blatant baiting/bagering to get an angry response
Another way to put it(suggested from a poster): "Personal attacks are not allowed. You can make your points effectively without attacking others posting on here."
Failure to follow this rule will lead to a ban.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Straw Man
|
|
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2012, 12:53:24 PM » |
|
Because the attackers are just pussies and whiners.
yep, we know that but what's the logic behind the rule why is one kind of baseless persona attack OK but not another If the goal to actually improve this board then why not "No baseless personal attacks" that would be a rule that would be easy to enforce and would immediately improve this board |
|
|
|
|
333386
Competitors
Getbig V
Posts: I am a geek!!
FUBO!
|
|
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2012, 12:54:01 PM » |
|
yep, we know that
but what's the logic behind the rule
why is one kind of baseless persona attack OK but not another
If the goal to actually improve this board then why not "No baseless personal attacks"
that would be a rule that would be easy to enforce and would immediately improve this board
Just STFU already w your cry baby bs. Its getting old already moron. |
|
|
|
|
|
LurkerNoMore
|
|
« Reply #5 on: December 27, 2012, 12:55:43 PM » |
|
Talking about Obamas wife if ok when making suggestions of beastality, but yet pointing out the two retards doing it don't even have wives is a no-no?
Pussies protecting pussies it seems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
24KT
|
|
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2012, 11:42:15 AM » |
|
Talking about Obamas wife if ok when making suggestions of beastality, but yet pointing out the two retards doing it don't even have wives is a no-no?
Pussies protecting pussies it seems.
That remark is extremely offensive to pussies everywhere. For quite sometime the posts of some of the most impassioned posters by practice & omission acknowledged that even the family members of public figures were off bounds. The saner posters realized it wasn't their fault who their parent/brother/sister/nephew etc etc was.... and for the most part steered clear, ...but not 333. He brought his racism into the mix to disrespect the President, the First Lady and her little girls like nothing I've ever seen before. |
w
|
|
|
|
WOOO
|
|
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2012, 07:36:51 PM » |
|
michele is hot
|
,
|
|
|
|
chaos
|
|
« Reply #8 on: January 01, 2013, 09:31:40 AM » |
|
michele is hot
Time for your optometrist appointment. |
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!
|
|
|
|
Montague
|
|
« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2013, 10:06:52 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WOOO
|
|
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2013, 10:15:55 AM » |
|
|
,
|
|
|
|
Montague
|
|
« Reply #11 on: January 01, 2013, 10:18:41 AM » |
|
10/12 = FUGLY 83.33333333% of the time. |
|
|
|
|
|
WOOO
|
|
« Reply #12 on: January 02, 2013, 08:44:40 AM » |
|
10/12 = FUGLY 83.33333333% of the time.
don't lie you would hit she's the most powerful woman in the world... that makes her sexy in and of itself |
,
|
|
|
|
Montague
|
|
« Reply #13 on: January 02, 2013, 04:58:01 PM » |
|
don't lie
you would hit
she's the most powerful woman in the world...
that makes her sexy in and of itself
Please...Hillary is more powerful than this hack. Hillary has, and will continue to accomplish far more than this phony pretends to. But, even with "help," I sincerely doubt I could jab either of them.  |
|
|
|
|
|
WOOO
|
|
« Reply #14 on: January 03, 2013, 06:32:35 AM » |
|
Please...Hillary is more powerful than this hack. Hillary has, and will continue to accomplish far more than this phony pretends to. But, even with "help," I sincerely doubt I could jab either of them. i'd bang hillary in a second... she's a GILF |
,
|
|
|
Armani
Getbig II
Gender: 
Posts: 162
161 confirmed kills and counting
|
|
« Reply #15 on: January 03, 2013, 10:10:18 AM » |
|
don't lie
you would hit
she's the most powerful woman in the world...
that makes her sexy in and of itself
Clearly. and I mean clearly, disgusting inside and outside as well as one of the worst hypocrites to ever walk the earth. |
|
|
|
|
|
P.I.P
|
|
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2013, 04:19:11 PM » |
|
Who would you choose if you had to fuck either Laura Bush or Michelle Obama? If you had no choice...  |
☩
|
|
|
|
P.I.P
|
|
« Reply #17 on: January 05, 2013, 04:19:45 PM » |
|
Who would you choose if you had to fuck either Laura Bush or Michelle Obama? If you had no choice... Laura was probably hot at one time, not sure about Michelle... |
☩
|
|
|
|
Montague
|
|
« Reply #18 on: January 05, 2013, 05:28:27 PM » |
|
Laura was probably hot at one time, not sure about Michelle...
Come on... You know the answer to that one. Look at the pictures I posted above. |
|
|
|
|
|
Hugo Chavez
|
|
« Reply #19 on: January 14, 2013, 11:17:06 PM » |
|
i'd bang hillary in a second... she's a GILF
Maybe so in the early 90's but if you're wanting to hit that now, there's something wrong with you. |
|
|
|
|
|
P.I.P
|
|
« Reply #20 on: January 14, 2013, 11:18:27 PM » |
|
Maybe so in the early 90's but if you're wanting to hit that now, there's something wrong with you.
haha... Would Big Mike Cox even touch that? Don't think so... |
☩
|
|
|
|
Hugo Chavez
|
|
« Reply #21 on: January 14, 2013, 11:22:23 PM » |
|
Who would you choose if you had to fuck either Laura Bush or Michelle Obama? If you had no choice... |
|
|
|
|
garebear
Time Out
Getbig V
Gender:
Posts: 6525
Never question my instincts.
|
|
« Reply #22 on: January 14, 2013, 11:24:49 PM » |
|
Personally, I didn't have any problem with baseless personal attacks. But after being warned about them, I feel that others should have the same constraints as me.
If it were up to me, I would go back to the old ways, where we took to the mattresses.
One thing I'd always liked about this site was that it was a free for all.
|
G
|
|
|
|
Hugo Chavez
|
|
« Reply #23 on: January 15, 2013, 01:23:53 AM » |
|
Personally, I didn't have any problem with baseless personal attacks. But after being warned about them, I feel that others should have the same constraints as me.
If it were up to me, I would go back to the old ways, where we took to the mattresses.
One thing I'd always liked about this site was that it was a free for all.
Others are getting warnings the same as you have so you're not being singled out... People on the right have already been banned under the new rule and have taken a time out from the board for it. Just make sure your posts are debating an issue in the thread without baiting for something else and you probably won't have a problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
Montague
|
|
« Reply #24 on: January 15, 2013, 06:38:19 AM » |
|
IMO, Hugo is an excellent mod, particularly for the Poli-board.
I've seen and appreciate the changes over the last several months and, for the most part, enjoy visiting there again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
