Sorry, was addressing the comments of others.
no worries
It started early on page 1
It just seems like any discussion of any form of gun legislation always devolves into total disarmament which is something no one is suggesting (at least no one is suggesting is seriously possible).
We have this ridiculous either/or arugment
Either we have no restrictions whatsoever or any restriction must eventually lead to total ban on guns
It's just a way for gun nuts to deflect from having a real dialogue