Tiananmen Square protest in favor of 2nd amendment

[Fury]

[ Invalid YouTube link ]

“To me, a rifle is not for sporting or hunting. It is an instrument of freedom.

It guarantees that I cannot be coerced, that I have free will, that I am a free man.

Now suppose, the 20 milllion Beijing citizens had a couple million rifles on hand in 1989? How many rounds should they have been allowed to load into their magazines? Ten rounds? Seven rounds? How about three rounds?

Do not give up the fight, my friends. It may be a small step that you give up your rifle, or a 30 round magazine.

But it will be a giant leap toward the destruction of this republic.

In closing, I will quote the words of Captain John Parker. “Stand your ground. Do not fire until fired upon. But, if they want a war, let it start here.”

[ Invalid YouTube link ]



Oppressed foreigners know what the idiots in this country do not.

[Roger Bacon]

Yes!  Thanks for posting this!

[Skip8282]

Oppressed foreigners know what the idiots in this country do not.

Post of the week.

[tonymctones]

these pro gun ban morons probably dont even know about tiananmen square.

[Soul Crusher]

good thread!

[pedro01]

Chinese government used Tanks In that protest, so rifles would have been useless.

If the rifles had turned out to be useful, the Chinese would have carpet bombed the square.

[tonymctones]

Chinese government used Tanks In that protest, so rifles would have been useless.

If the rifles had turned out to be useful, the Chinese would have carpet bombed the square.

youre right theres never been any incident in history when a smaller force with weaker fire power has ever defended themselves against a stronger better equiped opponent.

OH WAIT HISTORY IS FULL OF INCIDENTS LIKE THAT!!!

we had tanks in vietnam, we have tanks now in the middle east

you should think before you spout off idiocy based in emotion.

[Roger Bacon]

youre right theres never been any incident in history when a smaller force with weaker fire power has ever defended themselves against a stronger better equiped opponent.

OH WAIT HISTORY IS FULL OF INCIDENTS LIKE THAT!!!

we had tanks in vietnam, we have tanks now in the middle east

you should think before you spout off idiocy based in emotion.

Thank you, he's a fool... 

[Hugo Chavez]

Chinese government used Tanks In that protest, so rifles would have been useless.

If the rifles had turned out to be useful, the Chinese would have carpet bombed the square.

What are you going to say next, that if a majority of chinese were armed, the government would have just nuked their own country lol

[Fury]

Chinese government used Tanks In that protest, so rifles would have been useless.

If the rifles had turned out to be useful, the Chinese would have carpet bombed the square.

Seems the Syrian rebels have been doing OK.  


Guerrilla warfare works.

[dario73]

Chinese government used Tanks In that protest, so rifles would have been useless.

If the rifles had turned out to be useful, the Chinese would have carpet bombed the square.

Tu eres un imbecil de primer orden.

[Straw Man]

I guess France and Poland and Belgium didn't have rifles and handguns and that's why Germany was able to occupy their countries

Damn, I bet they feel stupid now when all they needed were to get some guns in the hands of their citizens

[Roger Bacon]

I guess France and Poland and Belgium didn't have rifles and handguns and that's why Germany was able to occupy their countries

Damn, I bet they feel stupid now when all they needed were to get some guns in the hands of their citizens

The resistance wasn't very well armed, yet they actually achieved a lot.

[tonymctones]

I guess France and Poland and Belgium didn't have rifles and handguns and that's why Germany was able to occupy their countries

Damn, I bet they feel stupid now when all they needed were to get some guns in the hands of their citizens

so youre saying they should have just surrendered without any sort of a fight and rolled over b/c they were outmatched?

[Straw Man]

so youre saying they should have just surrendered without any sort of a fight and rolled over b/c they were outmatched?

jesus christ you're dumb

I'm not even going to bother explaining my point to you

you'll only ignore it just every single time I explained my point about gun legislation you "heard" that I want to ban all guns

[Fury]

jesus christ you're dumb

I'm not even going to bother explaining my point to you

you'll only ignore it just every single time I explained my point about gun legislation you "heard" that I want to ban all guns

Tell us again how you think the 2nd amendment only applies to muskets.

"jesus christ you're dumb"

[Straw Man]

Tell us again how you think the 2nd amendment only applies to muskets.

"jesus christ you're dumb"

I never said it applied only to muskets

go find the post where I mentioned muskets and bump it and then I'll explain it to your dumbass

[pedro01]

youre right theres never been any incident in history when a smaller force with weaker fire power has ever defended themselves against a stronger better equiped opponent.

OH WAIT HISTORY IS FULL OF INCIDENTS LIKE THAT!!!

we had tanks in vietnam, we have tanks now in the middle east

you should think before you spout off idiocy based in emotion.

You've not been to China have you, petal?

You ever even been outside of the US?

Just because the US is constantly overwhelmed by forces with weaker firepower means very little when you talk about a government such as China in the same position.

This is why hooo-rah isn't required in Tibet or anywhere else China decides to take over.

[pedro01]

What are you going to say next, that if a majority of chinese were armed, the government would have just nuked their own country lol

No - I said they would quite happily carpet bomb a square full of armed protesters.

[pedro01]

Seems the Syrian rebels have been doing OK.  


Guerrilla warfare works.

Yes - because the Syrians aren't Chinese and they have to keep one eye on the west.

Chine does not give a fuck what the west thinks and will happily wipe out large groups of people if they feel threatened.

[Skip8282]

jesus christ you're dumb

I'm not even going to bother explaining my point to you

you'll only ignore it just every single time I explained my point about gun legislation you "heard" that I want to ban all guns

Sure sounds like you're saying roll over and surrender.  What are you getting at?

[tonymctones]

You've not been to China have you, petal?

You ever even been outside of the US?

Just because the US is constantly overwhelmed by forces with weaker firepower means very little when you talk about a government such as China in the same position.

This is why hooo-rah isn't required in Tibet or anywhere else China decides to take over.

actually i am quite well traveled, not just here in the US but abroad as well.
Ive also had the benefit of studying history and know for a fact that youre wrong...

[tonymctones]

No - I said they would quite happily carpet bomb a square full of armed protesters.

LOL why didnt they think of that in vietnam?

of they did...

LOL why didnt they think of that in iraq/afghanistan?

civilian casaulties...

you think all the ppl fighting the govt would wear uniforms and march together?

fuking idiot, this would be a guerilla warfare scenario. The govt wouldnt be able to tell friendlies from enemies.

how would they know who to bomb?

[Straw Man]

Sure sounds like you're saying roll over and surrender.  What are you getting at?

I'm saying guns in the hands of civilians are no match for the heavy weapons of the military

did you really not understand that was what I was saying

[Roger Bacon]

I'm saying guns in the hands of civilians are no match for the heavy weapons of the military

That's completely false